• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does Coriolanus make mistakes or errors in judgement that lead to his downfall? If so, what are they and how did they lead to his downfall?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Does Coriolanus make mistakes or errors in judgement that lead to his downfall? If so, what are they and how did they lead to his downfall? The play Coriolanus concerns the downfall and eventual death of a Roman general turned politician, Cauis Martius (later given the name Coriolanus after conquering the city of Corioles). Equipped with the traits of a brave soldier, a short temper and arrogance, these characteristics aid in his downfall which was also aided by several other factors. Whether it be a mistake or an error in judgement on Coriolanus's side, it is the result of either one which causes trouble for him. After announcing that he is reluctantly joining the senate, his mistakes and errors in judgement along with the rest of him would be publicly scrutinised, questioned and judged before the public. He lost the advantage of making mistakes and errors in judgement in the course of war where they would most probably end in his own death or personal injury. ...read more.

Middle

Going against his wishes to satisfy her wish for him to fight for his place in the consul by humiliating himself further; apologising to the plebeians. She, (Volumnia) says to Coriolanus, 'To beg of thee is more my dishonour than thou of them?'. She gives up and plays the role of the disappointed mother and Coriolanus caves in. 'Prithee mother, pray be content? chide me no more?' Though he would certainly be aware that listening to his mother was a mistake if her were not so dependent on her approbations and love. Though not a clear cut mistake, it certainly aided in his downfall. Coriolanus certainly obtains some time away from the influences of people when he is banished. He arrives at Antium, where he is prepared to die at Aufidius hands for all the harm he has done, 'If he slay me, He does fair justice?'. Though he goes on to say, 'if he give me way, I'll do his country service.' he switches his allegiances to Aufidius. ...read more.

Conclusion

The signing of the peace treaty with Rome pushed him into being a traitor in Aufidius eyes and those of Antium. After a heated verbal confrontation between Coriolanus, Aufidius and his conspirators, Coriolanus is killed. It is fair to say that Coriolanus's actions affect the most influential people in his life, and events. His being a good obedient son to a domineering, persuasive mother lead him to the event that highlights his flaws as his primary characteristics; the event being running for consulship. His inability and refusal to veil his hatred for the plebeians who are so easily influenced lead to his banishment. In the end, in him 'playing the man am I am' a great soldier, prompted envious and jealous feelings in his ally who later did not need much to kill him. Coriolanus's mistakes and errors in judgment were all leading to his eventual death due to him being governed by negative people, like his mother. Also negative emotions; his arrogance, and pride which refused and was unable to control due to his nature of seeking pleasure in violence, anger and was in full accordance of his warped upbringing by his war-hungry mother who has only projected maternal sense. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other works section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other works essays

  1. The contrast between Hotspur and Hal is the main theme in Henry IV part ...

    This is also an example of the way that Hotspur takes action rather than thinking about it. Hal is cool headed but can be nasty towards Falstaff. He knows that one day soon he will have to break his ties with Falstaff.

  2. A comparison (up to the end of Act 3) of the 'courts' of Henry ...

    Hal had planned this so that Falstaff would have to make two very dishonourable lies to him in order to retain his pride: he would need to exaggerate the amount of attackers on him, and also how they fought. This was as he had no significant marks on him to say that he was wounded and could not retaliate.

  1. Consider How Shakespeare Presents and Develops the Character of Prince Hal and Hotspur In ...

    "Who is to bear me like a thunderbolt Against the bosom of the Prince of Wales Harry to Harry shall, hot to horse to horse." Towards the end of Act 4, Scene 1 we see that Hotspur is all but defeated.

  2. To what extent does the tragedy of Titus Andronicus unfold from the protagonist and ...

    play, it is with Lavinia we see Titus as a good man, and so when she is tarnished so is this gentle, fatherly side of Titus. Lavinia is also a representation of his own shame, a shame he can only find peace from with death as we see in the last scene.

  1. Comment on and analyse the role of women in the King Richard 3rd?

    witches as curses is what witches are said to of used to punish people. The women do exactly that but to the men in their lives and who have hurt them. They also use them against each other to try and make themselves better and put each other down.

  2. Taking into consideration of the language and structure of the play, how would you ...

    It shows that women only had power with what they said. The fact that Anne is perceived in a supernatural way, could link her to religion, as she is trying to punish Richard, we could say that Anne has morals, Shakespeare could have been reflecting what Richard wasn't through the women.

  1. who in your opinion is the true hero of Henry the fourth part 1

    And consequently creates a positive bond with Hal. Hal then uses a soliloquy to convince the audience that he will change. The soliloquy shows that Hal, unlike the traditional hero, recognises his flaws saying that, 'my reformation, glitt'ring o'er my fault' (Act 1 Scene 2 line 201). However after this speech we are still not completely convinced that Hal will change.

  2. Coriolanus, write a critical appreciation of the following passage, (Act 1, Scene 1, 146-210) ...

    Lines are often divided, sometimes more than once, the caesuras created by the punctuation emphasising the pithy, stressed, often explosive projection of Martius? words, adding to an impression of his impatience and rage. The rhythm of the verse is further disrupted by the frequent use of trochaic feet, creating a

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work