• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16

Early and Later Wittgenstein's conception of the world, ethics and later analysis of language.

Extracts from this document...


Prompt: The essence of early Wittgenstein's philosophy is that we are to go about a life dictated by facts, facts and more facts. He is not able to talk about the "most important things in life," namely, ethics. This absolute view of the world softens in Wittgenstein's later philosophy. I believe the methodology that the later Wittgenstein uses may be able to benefit from a consideration of a transcendental phenomenological plane (or something similar) as that given by a similar philosopher, Sankara. Comparing Wittgenstein's later philosophy to that Sankara's, we can see how similar philosophies treat the placement of "the most important things in life" within their linguistic sphere and possibly examine the treatment of one of those "non-speakable" items: Ethics. In the end, I think that Wittgenstein has a distinct problem with reference and meaning that I hope to explain and perhaps examine to find a way to ethics in his own terminology. I. Early and Later Wittgenstein's conception of the world, ethics and later analysis of language. There are, for Wittgenstein, "hard" and "fluid" propositions and the relationship between them can change over time so that fluid propositions could become hardened and hardened ones could become fluid. However, the nature of these propositions, the ones that serve as foundations, is unlike ordinary propositions. The propositions or core beliefs that constitute a form of life cannot be enumerated as a set. This would constitute the set of our beliefs, which ground our human ways of living. However, propositions that stand fast for us, such as the claim that the earth existed long before my birth, cannot, it seems be listed as a set. In fact, Wittgenstein claims that the expression "I know" is misused if we think we can enumerate all the propositions that we know. I am aware that certain things stand fast for me but they are not articulated as propositions. ...read more.


pot," "real (sensed) cloth," "real (sensed) elephant," the objects (pot, cloth, elephant) constantly change, whereas the reality of the sense experience does not. What Sankara seems to have in mind when explaining the superimpositions of language in statements like "I am in pain," and "This is mine," is not the obvious explanation that these statements do not refer always to the same subject or object, but rather that they do not necessarily refer to any subject or object at all, even though at times they do. The boundaries of "I" or "Pain" or "this" or "mine" are not given by any of the terms language uses when it says "this is mine," or "I am in pain." In the Philosophical Investigations (404, 405), Wittgenstein brings out this same point when he suggests that any decision on identity-making has no one factual answer but rather depends on a great variety of criteria for determining personal (or other) identity. It is up to every language user to decide which criteria to employ. The simple use of terms like "I" or "mine" does not prescribe in any way which criterion we are to use. In fact it presupposes none. It is entirely up to us to decide the type of game we are going to play with sensation-terms so that we may decide, even while suffering the pain, which kind of "candidate" we wish to have as "sensation-owner." We will examine the criteria under which the Real is called "real" and multiplicity is called "illusion." Sankara uses the word "unreal" to mean everything other than Brahman (the Real). At times, however, he uses the word "real" to mean the commonly perceived world, in order to oppose this meaning to the "unreality" of dreams and hallucinations, like the water-mirage and the rope taken for a snake. He also uses the word "unreal" to mean the "non-experienceable," giving as illustrations examples common to all Indian philosophy: "hare's horn," "sky-flower," "a barren woman's son." ...read more.


is evident that if we strive to clarify those linguistic items that would have given us a problem in interpretation in that past, then we may perhaps be able to see a way to define a cogent interpretation of ethics. Without any previous barrier on interpretation, I believe that Wittgenstein has opened a pseudo-transcendental plane on which to encourage meaningful analysis. Since the focus is on the proper use of one's vernacular, ethics could hold a very important place in Wittgenstein's conception, namely it could be thus defined as how we are. Our everyday life could be our "ethics" and thus the notion of obscure reference is lost. We are our own best interpreter and if we choose to view our language in a rule-book fashion (I am going to do X because or the belief Y), then the world of ethics is much closer to us that Wittgenstein first thought. I think that this would satisfy Wittgenstein's earlier need to speak of come "unspeakable" items, namely ethics. It has been apparent that in fact Advaita Vedanta doesn't have any reasons to be backed into any sort of ethical corner; it seems Sankara helped to bring about the epitome of linguistic analysis as a method in philosophical investigations, which emerged much later in the Western tradition (1200 years later!), through the works of Wittgenstein. It is my impression that Wittgenstein and Sankara were both working on similar philosophical problems: problems of meaning and reference. The notion of Brahman was involved in the solution espoused by Sankara. Wittgenstein seems to want to iron out interpretation to better understand the prior unspeakable items. Philosophically, the more reliable and enlightening view takes it as merely a logico-linguistic condition that must be met for epistemological communication to be possible. 1 Tractatus: 1.1 2 Tractatus: 2.011, 2.0121, 2.0123, 2.013 3 Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, VI, 34 4 Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, I, 132 5 Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, I, 132 Senior Thesis 12/12/03 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Language: Context, Genre & Frameworks section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Language: Context, Genre & Frameworks essays

  1. Investigation into Gender Differences in the Language of Personal Profiles on Dating Websites

    a temporary basis and as we share the cooking I'm learning lots of new dishes and I haven't burnt one of them recently!. I want to be cared for but need someone strong enough not to let me get my own way all the time .I'd like to meet someone

  2. Frontline - Telling the Truth

    high regard, positioning the viewer to place their trust in Brooke and Marty's judgement. Satire as also used in this episode to show how the anchorperson causes the audience to respond in a certain way. This is seen through the rehearsing of Brooke's promo and the contrast between the on-screen and off-screen.

  1. How does Arthur Miller use the character of Eddie to build tension in his ...

    Besides he claims it is an honour for him to be able to help them. Catherine also has some news: she tells Eddie that she has been picked by her school's Principal, to work in a big plumbing company as a stenographer.

  2. Journey's End Raleigh

    He is not so particular about ranks and positions, treating his men like his equals. Unlike the colonel, Raleigh is sentimental and is extremely moved by Osborne's death. However amidst these good qualities, Raleigh possesses one bad quality, his inability to adapt quickly to circumstances.

  1. Creative writing and commentary. It was the year 2015 and Earth was exploring ...

    with a surprised look on his face he said to the bar tender "This is actually really nice, I know what I'm going to be drinking when we get there" The bar tender smiled "Glad you like it sir" Daniel started to drink some more when he felt a tap on his shoulders, it was Patrick and Rachel.

  2. Amitabh Bachan - Indian cinema.

    box office failure, and put the company down more then ever after promising better films He was supporting a white beard and black hair which showed that he was becoming old, and left his company in a downhill which was eventually left stranded.

  1. Compare the presentation of foreigners abroad in Indian Ink and A Room with a ...

    Lucy's self deception shows how at first she upholds these values but her display of feelings at the end towards George- '"It is impossible" murmured Lucy, and then, remembering the experiences of her own heart, she said "No, it is just possible" -show how she overcomes them.

  2. Linguistic Analysis of Dahl and Blyton

    it can be used to show the linguistic causes of stylistic variations between writers. The result of using Ohmann's theory in conjunction with Chambers' guidelines for criticism (discussed in the analysis below) is that one can show how linguistic variations in text can account for the changing reception of a

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work