• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

English investigation

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

English Investigation Introduction: For this project I am going to analyse how women and men behave when using language in casual situations? There have been many previous research finding and conclusions about gender and conversational behaviour. For example Jennifer Coates identified two approaches, which she describes as dominance and difference. Jennifer Coates was a writer to wrote about the language differences between men and women. Dominance argues that because women occupy a less powerful position in society than men, their constitutional behaviour is less assertive and less confident. Men are dominant within society, so it is not surprising that they tend to dominate mixed sex conversations. Women are said to be used to male dominance, and as a result of social conditioning will often be polite and respectful when speaking to men. Whereas the idea of difference is where the focus is more on differences in male and female attitudes and values, that are said to be inculcated from childhood, when we form, and are influenced by, single sex peer groups. Studies of children's play have found that in boy's games there is more emphasis on competition and confrontation, while girl's games are more cooperative. ...read more.

Middle

Analysis: First of all I am going to analyse the context of my data. The first transcript is between four friends occasionally five when they contribute to the conversation. The conversation is very informal and very casual with no real meaning or purpose except for socialising during break time, which means the conversation is quite forced to some extent even though they were talking about what they liked to talk about. All the women contributed equally I would say; to the conversation. Although women are characteristically and socially known for being quite capable and good at making conversation there is not a lot of prove from the experts or researchers that suggests that males do not make conversation or are any less capable. Therefore when looking at the men's conversation I saw that they were just as able and good at making conversation. The men's conversation was between three people occasionally four or five when they contributed to the conversation. This conversation was also very informal and casual and was also something that the men wanted to talk about. In the conversation you can see that between them there is one more dominant male who tends to initiate conversation and interrupt or overlap other speakers also could be know as holding the floor. ...read more.

Conclusion

Zimmerman and West (1915) taped informal conversations between students in coffee bars, shops and other public places. They found that women talk about 'feelings' whereas men talk more about 'things'. Women conversation is often focused on personal experiences, relationships and problems. The topic of male conversation tends to be more concrete, relating to information, facts objects and activities. And from my own experiences these finding are accurate but also my data could also suggest this as well, for example in my females transcripts there is reference to a personal experience that doesn't really play a part in the structure of the conversation, it is quite random. The participant says " Rory always corrects my spelling its well annoying on msn he always like types things in a little star and then says correct spelling" the participate gets interrupted while saying this as it is nothing to do with the conversation. Also in my transcript I can see that men use more taboo language than women do for example in my male conversation one participant says "fucking legend" whereas in my female conversation there was no swearing words used. However as my transcripts were quite short they do not relate to all females. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Language: Context, Genre & Frameworks section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Language: Context, Genre & Frameworks essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    English Language Investigation Into The Differences In The Use Of Hedging Between Genders.

    4 star(s)

    This therefore means that my conclusion is only valid for the age range I sampled and cannot be applied to other age groups and potentially some locations where the participants are less familiar with one another. As this may result in a differing number of hedges as women could potentially

  2. Investigation into Gender Differences in the Language of Personal Profiles on Dating Websites

    my job: Im a psychiatric nurse. my ethnicity: Im always asked if im italian or spanish due to my dark colouring. Unfortunately Im not that exciting. Just plain old english breeding! my religion: r/c but dont practice it. my education: diploma in mental health nursing.

  1. An investigation into the similarities and differences between written social interactions through the new ...

    I believe that speech only occurs when the vocal organs are exercised, which is not the case when one is involved in a written internet conversation or e-mail. Nevertheless, it is plausible to suggest that this form of internet communication is named with a figurative intent.

  2. Language Investigation: Barack Obama Inaugural Address

    This modest approach he takes is done in order to not seem arrogant. Superlatives used Comparatives Used Surest Better (x2), Smaller, Leader (x2) Grandest Greater, Stronger (x2), Darkest Lower Coldest Longer * Complexity Below is a table which summarises several aspects which shows the complexity of Obama's speech.

  1. Language investigation

    despite all its delicious associations of pluck and humour and broadmindedness is a very ugly wrenching of distinguishable sounds into indistinguishable. Cottle 1975 As well as RP I shall be looking at the Estuary accent - the modern accent of preference.

  2. An exploration of the extent in which childrens TV presenters accommodate to the participants ...

    splash with your mates" and there is also a lot of narrating rather than participant interaction, for instance "Both teams are poised on the starting blocks" which shows that there is very small instances of accommodation from the presenter to the participants.

  1. Turn taking mechanisms in conversation.

    Where overlaps do occur they appear to do so for a number of reasons. Overlaps may occur where TRPs have been mis-projected or can be used as an intentional interruption. Most overlaps are examples of the former and are brief in nature.

  2. An analysis of variations in style in comparison to Standard English.

    There is no contrast between pairs of words like put and putt, both being pronounced [put]. b) [æ] occurs in words like dance, daft etc. [...] c) Words like book and cook have the vowel [u:] 2. Unlike in other northern urban accents (but in common with Newcastle), the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work