• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

English Literature - Frankenstein

Extracts from this document...


"Frankenstein and his creature are in fact the same person". Discuss When considering this question one must first take note of the discrepancy between the literal presentation of the relationship between Frankenstein and his creature, and the figurative presentation of that. Are Shelley's intentions predominantly to bring our attention to the fixed sequence of events - to perceive the story in a literal manner - or to a more implicit message; an analogy of bodily union between the two antagonists? Of course, today, when one utters the name 'Frankenstein' the first image thought up is that of a detestable, monstrous, green entity with bolts through the neck. This is indeed erroneous when taking Shelley's novel into account, yet it still offers us an allusion to the idea of the double. It has frequently been suggested that the creature assumes the role of a doppelg´┐Żnger - or alter-ego - to Frankenstein. That he is merely an extension, or reflection of his creator (indeed 'creature' implies 'creator'). They both assume various synonymous roles throughout the novel; for example, their corresponding isolation, the omission of female influence in their matters, their juxtaposed intentions to take revenge, and of course the simple fact that Victor is presented as a solitary 'parent' to the creature - the only person with whom the creature has an emotional bond. So, let us first look at this issue of Victor's and the creature's 'father-son' relationship. ...read more.


This now brings us onto the creature's reasons for isolation. He is an outcast from the world to the extent that even those he thought to be well-natured and understanding - the De Lacey family - callously repel him. He is excluded from domestic life, albeit involuntarily, ´┐Ż la his creator. Looking at one interpretation, we might view this rebuttal of oddities as an attack by Shelley on societal conditioning (displayed effectively by the young, innocent William's preconceptions of the monster as an "ogre" and a "fiend") and the corrupt narrow-minded outlook of society towards what, on the surface, appears to be evil, but is in fact benevolent (the creature being a 'noble savage'). The monster's situation arouses a poignant sense of pity in the reader. His solitude - a common theme throughout Gothic literature - forces him into "malignity" (this word having been repeated frequently throughout the novel by Victor as narrator). The creature is, therefore, not just a reflection of Adam, but also of Satan - an outcast from heaven (of course, the monster's 'heaven' can possibly be interpreted to be the respect and understanding of man towards him). Furthermore, the creature strikes similarities with John Milton's representation of Satan in Paradise Lost ("Better to rule in Hell than to serve in Heaven"). The monster's murderous exploits cast an ominous light over him - he is now the villain. ...read more.


the possibility for Shelley's intentions to have been for that of the double (this dichotomous murder of partners also continues to support the omission of the female). To summarise, then, it is of great import that there is nothing to rule out the possibility of Shelley delivering this work as a purposeful analogy; pointing to a bodily union of Frankenstein with his monster. Of course, we must understand that if one is to perceive the novel in this manner it will always be subjective and never constant. Yet, the evidence is there, as a supplement, for those who harbour this view. The creature and creator are spiritually one and the same. Their positions in the narrative and corresponding actions are crucially paralleled. Victor is the creature's father, Victor is the creature's God, Victor is the creature's focus of vengeance, and Victor is the only entity with which (possibly with the exception of the De Laceys) the creature has a poignantly governed relationship. Yet, to say that these two characters are 'the same person' is possibly stretching this idea to an unaccountable degree. Indeed, they may just be separate characters with strong parallels - Shelley's narrative simply outlining their synonymy and corresponding situations. Maybe Shelley's message is essentially bringing our attention to the fact that these two characters, despite being at each other's throats throughout, still maintain such a powerful understanding and spiritual bond. Nevertheless, this issue will forever be open to argument. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1,428 words ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Mary Shelly section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Mary Shelly essays

  1. Compare and contrast the ways in which Frankenstein and one other Gothic novel explore ...

    However, it is when Dracula is seen in the coffin that Stoker makes his main effort to ensure that his creation will go down in history as being a truly monstrous being; the use of description, such as describing the Count as an 'awful creature', 'gorged with blood', and even

  2. Who is the real monster in Mary Shelleys Frankenstein

    It understands that 'prejudice clouds the eyes' of mankind, 'and where they ought to see a feeling and a kind friend, they see only a detestable monster'. The old man De Lacey himself reinforces this point by saying that the creature seemed to be a 'noble and virtuous being'.

  1. Analysis of Frankenstein Extract pages 101 103

    tree of knowledge, the monster reciprocates the betrayed by killing family members. The monster models itself around Paradise Lost which it takes to be the written Truth, and sets out to avenge his undeserved punishment and destroys what his creator holds dearest.

  2. Through Victors narrative in Volume 1, what social comments about parentage and responsibility is ...

    his inevitable ?destiny? of creating the monster, and William?s death reveals to Victor the true nature of parental responsibility, as he bears some guilt for creating the monster that murdered his own brother, as well as Justine indirectly: ?The poor victim, who was on the morrow to pass?But I, the

  1. To what extent can the reader sympathise with the creature in Frankenstein?

    He becomes truly demonic and fills his heart with ?hellish triumph? as he realises he can make Victor desolate by hurting the ones around him. This malevolent behaviour is worsened by the fact the creature knows what he is doing is wrong and suggests himself as Satan by even echoing

  2. Many critics have commented that the creature is ultimately a character with whom we ...

    We see this isn?t true when William shouts ?Hideous monster!? and begs for him to let go. We see that he is already corrupted by the human instinct to fear and hate the ugly. This corruption is mirrored by the creature, who began enjoying gentle, simple things such as birds singing.

  1. Human curiosity in "Frankenstein"

    The next very curious character is the result of Victor Frankenstein?s experiments, the Creature, and he was the most curious character in Shelley?s novel, because at the beginning after his creation he was like a child, he did not know anything in this world, and everything was new for him.

  2. How does Shelly portray the creature through her narrative?

    of the novel when the destruction of the ?fire? leaves nothing left apart from misery. Education is the main thing that makes him miserable.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work