• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Language of Protest

Extracts from this document...


The Language of Protest The language of political protest and pressure has taken many forms. I shall try to show this range and variety by analyzing four examples that have very different historical contexts and which take very different approaches: Martin Luther King's famous `I Have a Dream' speech; Jonathan Swift's satire `A Modest Proposal'; and contemporary tests from New Internationalist magazine and from a Friends of the Earth advertisement. King's speech shows all the oratorical mastery than made him so indispensable to the US Civil Rights movement of the sixties. The language is that of the Baptist preacher, often biblical in tone, rich with metaphor and a great array of rhetorical techniques. It is appropriate to the circumstances: the charismatic leader heading a great crusade. Although the text appears to have been fully written - every phrase is carefully crafted - the sense of the audience is evident throughout, above all in the way that King contrives to build fervour and excitement. It is not so much intended to persuade (he was addressing supporters) but to inspire. King initiates his speech by uniting his audience by using noble abstract nouns and dignified words. He carefully calculates the emotions of his audience as he speaks, and in doing so he milks cheers from them, thus showing their support for the cause. King begins: "I am happy to join with you today in what will go down as the greatest demonstration for freedom in the history of our nation." The abstract nouns such as `'freedom' and `history', attach great importance to the cause. Right from the outset, King sets this powerful tone which prevails throughout much of his speech. Dignified words such as `nation' also add impetus to his speech. However, more importantly, King utilizes the possessive pro-noun `our' in front of the word `nation'. Therefore, King is deliberately saying that this demonstration will not just go down in the history of America, but more essentially of `our nation'. ...read more.


Unlike King's speech, `A Modest Proposal' there is only one tone throughout the passage. Swift amusingly his target by the parody of political and economical language. One of these targets was the economists. Swift uses this language when he is calculating the number of children that can be used for food in Ireland. He deliberately de-humanises people, with his attention to figures and facts. As Swift uses sound mathematical reasoning to justify his claims, the poor people loose their humanity and become facts and figures. Swift is using the force of satire, which makes his argument seem reasonable. Swift writes, "The number of souls in this kingdom being usually reckoned one million and a half, of these I calculate there may be about two hundred thousand couples whose wives are breeders; from which I subtract thirty thousand couples who are able to maintain their own children... there will remain and hundred and seventy thousand breeders. I again subtract fifty thousand for those women who miscarry, or whose children die by accident or disease within the year." The effect of using this language is to label the poor as useless and therefore Swift proposes to use the poor as an economic resource i.e. to feed the rich. By doing so, the two main problems of famine and overpopulation can be resolved. Thus, Swift is having fun at the expense of economists. He maybe directly referring to the famous economist called Malthus. Malthus said that populations grow geometrically, whereas food supply only grows arithmetically, and therefore, the supply of food in the world will one day be insufficient to feed the population. Regardless of whether Malthus' theory is true or not, Swift may not have liked it because it sounds very de-humanising and this is a characteristic flaw in the way economists generally talk. Furthermore, throughout the proposal, there are two languages in progress. There is a moral one. ...read more.


It was the timber cutter, Oscar Branco, with 16 hired gunmen. Te men got out and shouted that they had come to kill everyone. They started firing... Fourteen Indians, including children were killed. Twenty-two more were injured... Everyone knew who the killers were... Yet four years have passed and no one has been prosecuted. Those Indians and their children - their deaths didn't count." In addition to the short sentences, all of what we read is just factual. The narrator doesn't on any occasion reveal to us his or her feelings to what has happened. The narrator simply tells us the incidents that occurred. Therefore, the reader is expected to react independently to what read. Therefore, reaction to the cruelty of the gunmen from the reader, and not the narrator, making it more effective. In the concluding the section, the narrator intensifies her story by blaming the reader for what has happened. From being an ill - informed audience, the reader becomes a secondary oppressor to the woodcutters. The narrator uses extremely strong language to evoke a sense of guilt in the reader so that the reader would help. It states: "Your greed for mahogany. You in Britain buy more then half the mahogany Brazil produces. Look! That deep red glow in your mahogany dinner table is the blood of murdered Indians. Listen! The clatter of your mahogany luxuries is the gunfire that killed Indian children" It is very forceful language. It ties together common images such as the `dinner table' with the `blood' and dead children. It finishes by demanding help and uses repetition in the conclusion where it states, `Please join us. Please do it now.' Therefore, by bringing the reader into the situation, the narration hopes to make the reader feel that they have a responsibility to help as they own mahogany goods. Constantly, throughout the piece, the tone switches. It begins as informative by telling us about the mahogany trees and the wood-cutters. It then becomes very factual and concludes with forceful language and an emotive plea. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Jonathan Swift section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Jonathan Swift essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The English Patient

    5 star(s)

    Caravaggio tells Almasy that he worked for the British as a thief and that Almasy was considered a dangerous spy - all of British Intelligence had been looking for him. The English patient knows nothing of all of this and can only attest to his love for Katharine.

  2. Comparing "Educating Rita" and "Pygmalion"You taught me language, and my profit ont / is ...

    Both women struggle to fit in with their class and are not confident in how they will successfully manage their changes without the help from Higgins and Frank. Both of the characters struggle and difficulty is portrayed with the use of symbolism.

  1. Compare the opening pages of The Bell Jar and One Flew Over the Cuckoos ...

    Sylvia Plath also presents the idea of Esther being misplaced in this first sentence of the novel. The fact that Esther does not know what she is doing in New York implies that she does not know what she wants to do with her life and why she is even there.

  2. A comparison of the satirical techniques in Alexander Pope's The Rape of the Lock ...

    This notion is presented both through her own actions and indirectly through the speech of other characters. Indeed, Canon Chasuble comments on her actions in reconciling the two warring brothers: "You have done a beautiful thing today my child". Gwendolyn appears to suggest that her nature is reflected even in

  1. Comparison between The Tell-tale Heart by Edgar Allan Poe and Misery by Stephen King.

    "It grew quicker and quicker, and louder and louder every instant . . . It grew louder I say, louder every moment" This phrase contains a lot of repetition as the narrator is trying to stress how quick and loud the beating heart was.

  2. madness through king lear, the fool and edgar

    In the days of Shakespeare, 'Bedlam hospital' housed the mentally ill. When they were released Bedlam inmates were allowed to go begging for survival; this is what Edgar has been reduced to by his gullible father and his brother's trickery.

  1. 19th Century Mystery Stories Coursework

    spooky feel of the place, and is a warning of the dangers to come in the story. The fact that we know that he works on a deserted railway line on his own, put insecurity into the reader's and into the signalman's mind too.

  2. Satire in Animal Farm, A Modest Proposal and A Political Cartoon

    Even when you have conquered him, do not adopt his vices? foreshadows the breakdown of their utopian ideals and the rise to power of Napoleon, the main antagonist. As Animal Farm progresses, the irony in the aforementioned warning becomes all the more apparent as the inherent human vices of greed

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work