• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month


Extracts from this document...


Use of Language: "Accidental Death of an Anarchist" After reading Dario Fo's script for "Accidental Death of an Anarchist" we can clearly see that the use of language during the play is quite interesting as they underline certain characteristics of the people in the play, the things that they represent and therefore the whole meaning and comical affect of the play itself. When looking at his use of language in more detail, we carried out a few diverse tasks to see how and why Fo used the linguistic devices that he did. One of our practical tasks was to study an extract from a 'parallel' piece of script, "Oooh What a Mess, (The terrible tale of Stephen Lawrence)". This was created by previous students at Stowupland High School who tried to imitate Fo's styles for a satirical comic effect. Through studying this we also learnt about what types of language and linguistic devices Fo used in his own plays. For example, there are a couple of occasions in 'Oooh What a Mess' when word play is used. For example, Clement mentions the size of a torch and Bullock replies with, 'Don't worry Searg, size isn't everything!' This verbal humour creates an innuendo which manages to make a mockery of an authority figure which Fo liked to do a lot in his own plays, I also t has a comic effect, which adds to how well it works. ...read more.


With an m?' He knows that this could sound uncouth, so he plays on it. * Another time when Fo used word play, he created a large amount of irony in doing so. This time the Super says 'Galoshes are a ridiculous garment. An anarchist wouldn't be seen dead in them!' The Anarchist did actually die, so this word play creates an ironic atmosphere. Absurd Non-Sequiturs * Another linguistic device which Fo uses in this play to create humour is absurd non-sequiturs. He used these so they confuse the police to show the audience that the Maniac is far more intelligent than the policemen are. Fo didn't agree with how much power some people had due to who they were and what they did, so he uses these devices to baffle the policemen and expose their lack of logic. The Maniac frequently uses non-sequiturs, managing to confuse the Policemen. * An example of this is when Pissani asked the Superintendent to 'come here as quickly as possible if he can...' The Maniac replies with 'Yes-even if he can't'. This type of language is used to bewilder the officials and makes the audience laugh at their expense. Exaggeration and Sarcasm * Throughout the play we can see that there are many examples of exaggeration and sarcasm. Fo made sure the Maniac used them regularly. This managed to give the Maniac his own distinctive style of language which he could use effectively when attacking other characters. ...read more.


This is effective because it demonstrates to the audience that the Maniacs behaviour and attitude towards the police has a very tedious effect on them making them very irritated and angry, which is humorous. Childish Phraseology * Childish Phraseology is used in the play to make the Maniac seem to have more authority and power over the policemen. In the play the policemen become very child, like and behave in a way a young child would when the Maniac wittily outsmarts them. An example of this is when Pissani is talking to the Super about the 'accident' of the anarchist and says "I only did it because you told me to", which he says in a very sulkily, childish manner. It is clear that in the play all the characters have their own distinctive use of language and their own the different use of linguistic devices. All of the policemen try to talk as if they are in fact upper class and have authority over the other characters. They do this by using jargon and euphemisms to make themselves sound impressive. The Maniacs use of language is mostly all linguistic devices, he mostly uses sarcasm to patronize the policemen and belittle them. The character Mrs Felleti however, is very sophisticated and formal when she is speaking, which is shown when she is asking questions. Her use of language is very much contrasts with the other characters, because it is direct and to-the-point. This works well as a counter-balance to the flippant, mischievous language of the Maniac. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Brian Friel section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Brian Friel essays

  1. The Birthday Party, a comedy of menace (Pinter)

    Likewise, Stanley's attempts at humour when talking to Lulu are a kind of proof of his social inadequacy. When she says that it's stuffy he replies "Stuffy? I disinfected the place this morning." And when she talks about his getting under Meg's feet he says he "always stand[s] on the table when she sweeps the floor".

  2. Analyze Brecht as the man, the context of his life, his theatre technique of ...

    For the next six years his communistic ideology was portrayed though his plays. When Hitler came into power in 1933, Brecht's plays were banned, and communist supporters were under threat, so Brecht fled to Norway. Up until 1941 he began writing some of his best work.

  1. How does Pinter exploit the verbal and the visual in the Birthday Party

    Who? Petey: Some girl. Meg: Who, Petey, who? Petey: I don't think you'd know her. Meg: What's her name? Petey: Lady Mary Splatt. Meg: I don't know her." Their dialogue is full of pointless questions, obvious statements and vague words such as "nice" which is repeated 15 times throughout the dialogue.

  2. Long Day's Journey into Night: Can One Successfully Escape Reality?

    Maybe it is not possible to escape reality, but the entire Tyrone family works together in an effort to avoid any acknowledgment of its existence. It is violating an unwritten family law to even consider the fact that Mary may have relapsed, or that Edmund's illness could be fatal.

  1. Futility of existence in Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead

    It can also highlight humans lack of control over their lives as they can only act as how fate has planned us to do, we cannot make a move that hasn't already been predetermined.

  2. Discuss the view that Tony Lumpkin in "She Stoops to Conquer"is nothing more than ...

    character, since he cannot even track his own age; complimenting Janik?s criticism. Moreover, considering that in Georgian England, most country dwellers were uneducated; Tony is clearly an accurate stereotype of a bumpkin. Tony?s lack of education, ?the ale-house and the stable are the only schools he?ll ever go to?, also

  1. In Murmuring Judges, David Hare uses Barry to represent the stereotypical bent policemen that ...

    However, Hare also uses this scene to strengthen the presentation of Barry?s disliking towards lawyers, as shown by ?when was the last time anyone was sick on your wig?, which suggests Barry sees lawyers as out of touch with the real job of justice.

  2. A tragicomedy is a comedy with serious elements or overtones*. To what extent can ...

    This argument can be countered by the view that serious messages are often at the heart of tragicomedies. As Ustinov said, ?comedy is simply a funny way of being serious?. This dates back to Shakespearean time, where the dangers of irrational love are portrayed in a humorous forest scene in A Midsummers Night Dream.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work