• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

HOW FAR DO YOU AGREE WITH THE VIEW THAT IN HENRY IV THE PRESENT IS ALWAYS OVERWHELMED BY THE PAST

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

HOW FAR DO YOU AGREE WITH THE VIEW THAT IN HENRY IV THE PRESENT IS ALWAYS OVERWHELMED BY THE PAST EXPLAIN CLEARLY HOW THE PLAY PRESENTS THE INFLUENCE OF PAST EVENTS AND COMMENT ON THE HOW THE PLAY ATTEMPTS TO ESCAPE THE PAST The play 'King Henry IV' revolves around a central plotline spanning a vast period of time encompassing numerous significant events. All of these events, however small, play a key role in the development of the characters as well as the themes within the play. The idea that in coming to power King Henry IV seized the crown, overruling the divine right of kings, is central to the constant theme of corruption and fear which runs throughout the plot. One of the main themes present is the journey from adolescence to maturity. Prince Hal is clearly a wayward character, seemingly dangerously close to losing his right to rule. It would appear that his association with characters such as Falstaff and Poins have nothing but negative implications. ...read more.

Middle

This unrest is partially down to worry concerning Prince Hal, but is also related to the way in which Henry himself seized power. Henry's trouble stems from his own uneasy conscience and his uncertainty about the legitimacy of his rule. Previously he had illegally usurped the throne from Richard II, therefore breaching the divine right of kings, a power bestowed upon the monarch from God. This past troubles him greatly and suppresses his ability to become a great leader. The influence of the past on Henry IV is clearly great; there is no escape from it other than impending death. Therefore one can assume that throughout the play he is simply running from past events rather than focusing on the future, in this case the future of his country. This is therefore an example of how in King Henry IV Part II the past overshadows the present and the future. The role of Northumberland as a leader of rebellion forces is also influenced by decisions made in the past. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, unlike King Henry he is not haunted by the worry of these events, he instead continues forward allowing them to take their own path, only dodging out of their way when cornered with no chance of escape. He is well aware of his illnesses, yet would rather brush them aside and live his life day by day, he turns disease into commodity and flirts with Doll through a desire which has long outlived performance. In this sense one could argue that in Falstaff's case he lives for the present and the future rather than allowing his past to overshadow his current situation. Therefore, in conclusion it seems that to large degree the argument that the past predominately overshadows the future is valid. In the case of many of the main characters previous decisions and ways of life have a profound impact on the way in which they behave in present situations. The past is clearly a powerful entity and one which plays a key role in defining the plot and decisions made throughout the play, in many cases overshadowing the present and destroying the future. ?? ?? ?? ?? Christopher Alton 6AR March 7, 2008 Page 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Playwrights section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Playwrights essays

  1. The contrast between Hotspur and Hal is the main theme in Henry IV part ...

    Hotspur doesn't like the way Glendower uses rhetoric relentlessly. He prefers to speak the straightforward truth. From this childish exchange we gain further insight into Hotspur's character, he cannot bear to think that someone else could share glory and honour with him. This also shows that he would prefer to speak the truth rather than made up stories.

  2. who in your opinion is the true hero of Henry the fourth part 1

    The king then says that 'even as I was then is Percy now' (Act 3 Scene 2 line 97), making a comparison between himself and Hotspur because they both cannot recognise their flaws. When the king finally accepts Hal, it is almost like he is recognising his flaws and forgiving

  1. Comment on and analyse the role of women in the King Richard 3rd?

    Another role for the women in the play is to mourn the dead. Everyone that is killed during the play has something to do with one or more of the four women. Elizabeth loses her husband and mourns his death very badly, she is the one that has to tell his children and the Duchess.

  2. Coriolanus is a man of action who is finally defeated by words. To what ...

    Words are evidently not only his enemy but also something that he himself is scared of, reflected in his modest behaviour, and he also says that 'when blows have made [him] stay [he] fled from words'. He knows that he is not a good speaker and would therefore rather stay a soldier.

  1. How far do you agree that the ending of Henry IV (part 2) is ...

    now that Henry V was now taking over that the country is now freed and this ending supports this as Hal becomes free of Eastcheap and the corruption that lies between the common people. This makes us believe that the play could end triumphantly and this contradicts the pity the audience feels for Falstaff.

  2. Richard III, explore the way Shakespeare shapes an audience's response to Richard

    18, which Shakespeare could have wanted Richard to include in the soliloquy because it is a feeling that many in the audience can relate to and thus feel that they can connect with him. It is at this point that we can understand why Richard feels rejected by the Yorkists,

  1. Taking into consideration of the language and structure of the play, how would you ...

    Therefore I would direct the actor to change his whole physicality from when he is on stage with others and when on his own. When talking to himself, his posture will be strong (for a disabled man) and his chin pulled close to him; to show his self-confidence in his intelligence, yet his secrecy.

  2. Examine closely the contrasting characters of Hal and Hotspur in King Henry IV, Part ...

    This contrast is shown clearly with the alternating scenes' having every scene being set on either Hal in Eastcheap and then the next with Hotspur in a knightly place. This helps with the development and change of the two characters as you can see clearly the rise of Hal throughout

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work