Part of The Student Room Group

  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

HOW FAR DO YOU AGREE WITH THE VIEW THAT IN HENRY IV THE PRESENT IS ALWAYS OVERWHELMED BY THE PAST

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

HOW FAR DO YOU AGREE WITH THE VIEW THAT IN HENRY IV THE PRESENT IS ALWAYS OVERWHELMED BY THE PAST EXPLAIN CLEARLY HOW THE PLAY PRESENTS THE INFLUENCE OF PAST EVENTS AND COMMENT ON THE HOW THE PLAY ATTEMPTS TO ESCAPE THE PAST The play 'King Henry IV' revolves around a central plotline spanning a vast period of time encompassing numerous significant events. All of these events, however small, play a key role in the development of the characters as well as the themes within the play. The idea that in coming to power King Henry IV seized the crown, overruling the divine right of kings, is central to the constant theme of corruption and fear which runs throughout the plot. One of the main themes present is the journey from adolescence to maturity. Prince Hal is clearly a wayward character, seemingly dangerously close to losing his right to rule. It would appear that his association with characters such as Falstaff and Poins have nothing but negative implications. ...read more.

Middle

This unrest is partially down to worry concerning Prince Hal, but is also related to the way in which Henry himself seized power. Henry's trouble stems from his own uneasy conscience and his uncertainty about the legitimacy of his rule. Previously he had illegally usurped the throne from Richard II, therefore breaching the divine right of kings, a power bestowed upon the monarch from God. This past troubles him greatly and suppresses his ability to become a great leader. The influence of the past on Henry IV is clearly great; there is no escape from it other than impending death. Therefore one can assume that throughout the play he is simply running from past events rather than focusing on the future, in this case the future of his country. This is therefore an example of how in King Henry IV Part II the past overshadows the present and the future. The role of Northumberland as a leader of rebellion forces is also influenced by decisions made in the past. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, unlike King Henry he is not haunted by the worry of these events, he instead continues forward allowing them to take their own path, only dodging out of their way when cornered with no chance of escape. He is well aware of his illnesses, yet would rather brush them aside and live his life day by day, he turns disease into commodity and flirts with Doll through a desire which has long outlived performance. In this sense one could argue that in Falstaff's case he lives for the present and the future rather than allowing his past to overshadow his current situation. Therefore, in conclusion it seems that to large degree the argument that the past predominately overshadows the future is valid. In the case of many of the main characters previous decisions and ways of life have a profound impact on the way in which they behave in present situations. The past is clearly a powerful entity and one which plays a key role in defining the plot and decisions made throughout the play, in many cases overshadowing the present and destroying the future. ?? ?? ?? ?? Christopher Alton 6AR March 7, 2008 Page 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Playwrights section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

or


Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Playwrights essays

  1. The contrast between Hotspur and Hal is the main theme in Henry IV part ...

    Hotspur doesn't like the way Glendower uses rhetoric relentlessly. He prefers to speak the straightforward truth. From this childish exchange we gain further insight into Hotspur's character, he cannot bear to think that someone else could share glory and honour with him. This also shows that he would prefer to speak the truth rather than made up stories.

  2. Comment on and analyse the role of women in the King Richard 3rd?

    Another role for the women in the play is to mourn the dead. Everyone that is killed during the play has something to do with one or more of the four women. Elizabeth loses her husband and mourns his death very badly, she is the one that has to tell his children and the Duchess.

  1. Coriolanus is a man of action who is finally defeated by words. To what ...

    Words are evidently not only his enemy but also something that he himself is scared of, reflected in his modest behaviour, and he also says that 'when blows have made [him] stay [he] fled from words'. He knows that he is not a good speaker and would therefore rather stay a soldier.

  2. How far do you agree that the ending of Henry IV (part 2) is ...

    now that Henry V was now taking over that the country is now freed and this ending supports this as Hal becomes free of Eastcheap and the corruption that lies between the common people. This makes us believe that the play could end triumphantly and this contradicts the pity the audience feels for Falstaff.

  1. Richard III, explore the way Shakespeare shapes an audience's response to Richard

    Nay, now dispatch; 'twas I that stabb'd young Edward; But 'twas thy heavenly face that set me on.' Shakespeare's language here summons mixed emotions for the audience. Firstly, we should consider that Richard is indeed pushing his power to its limits as he encompasses subtle hints that he is lying

  2. The Importance of the Conflict and Resolution in King Henry IV Part I

    Out of this motif of honour, arises the conflict between Hal and Hotspur and Falstaff about the notion of honour. "Hotspur and Falstaff are the two extremes of honour" --- Kaston. Falstaff underestimate honour, while Hotspur overestimate it to the point of obsession.

  1. Taking into consideration of the language and structure of the play, how would you ...

    We get the idea of women being these supernatural beings in this scene, and of course prophesizing and religion. The consonance of the 'c' in the beginning of cursing gives it a violent edge, as if Anne is trying to cut through Richard with her words.

  2. who in your opinion is the true hero of Henry the fourth part 1

    Hotspur quickly reverts to childish behaviour whereas by comparison Hal becomes mighty and noble. Having won the favor of the audience he is positioned perfectly to rise into the plays hero. From the beginning of the play the audience perceive Hal as a villain, in Act 1 Scene 1, the king rains abuse upon Hal's name.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work