• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent does Falstaffs role transcend that of a buffon in henry IV part 1

Extracts from this document...


Falstaff's role undoubtedly transcends that of a buffoon however Falstaff is also portrayed as an anarchic spirit, ready to defy any rules in order to satisfy his own appetites. Falstaff's extrovert character therefore has an inevitable affect on Hals later decisions. Shakespeare portrays Falstaff as an enormous paradox. He is a huge man, who is so quick witted and so deft at manipulating language that he remains eternally elusive. He is quick to use others and has no sense of honesty, yet he gives and inspires great affection in those around him. He is a relatively old man, yet he refuses to admit the fact. He is a knight of the realm, yet acknowledges no sense that being a knight requires of him any decorum, loyalty, or respectable behaviour. He is an enormously selfish man, but he brings out of others some of their best qualities of wit, good fellowship, and conversation. It is Possible that Shakespeare wants us to interpret Falstaff as some sort of Lord of Misrule, a figure of irrepressible energy and joyousness in life who exists as a counter to the necessary order and stability in political society. ...read more.


Shakespeare therefore deliberately portrays Falstaff in this manor to challenge the audience's perceptions and offers a more corrosive ironic counterpoint throughout the play. This quality is most evident when we explore the theme of honour. Shakespeare deliberately contrasts Hotspurs traditional concept of honour with that of Henry IV. Henrys sense of military honour permits him to have several other knights dress up in his royal armour and impersonate him on the battlefield, so that his enemies will wear themselves out chasing and fighting the wrong person. From Henry's point of view, this is clever military strategy, an efficient policy at work; from Hotspur's point of view it is a denial of what true honour requires, which is not something politically efficient but something deeply personal, a manifestation of one's true character. From Falstaff's point of view, all honour which requires one to run the risk of losing one's life is absurd. In fact, any sense of honour which holds one back from seizing a good opportunity to enrich oneself is merely an empty word, to which he is not prepared to pay attention. ...read more.


If the king and the lords are lying, stealing, and deceiving, why shouldn't he? At least the scale of his operations is much smaller. Moreover, Shakespeare portrays him as quite candid about what he is doing and does not attempt to justify his actions as somehow morally defensible (except in mock justifications which parody the official language of the court). In fact, his impersonation of them, his appropriation of their high-toned language for satiric purposes, reminds us constantly of the hypocrisy of their special pleading. He has a capacity to bring joy to others, to make them laugh, to inspire their affections, in a manner quite impossible in the royal court. That's why the presence of Falstaff is much more subversive than a sentimental picture of him might suggest. He candidly acknowledges what he does and why he does it and our knowledge of what is happening on the larger scale doesn't give us the solid assurances we need to deal with Falstaff as we might wish. Shakespeare uses Falstaff as a manifestation of ones self. An appropriate counterweight used to encourage us to question the morality of others in the play and maybe even the morality of our own society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Henry V section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Henry V essays

  1. Coriolanus is a man of action who is finally defeated by words. To what ...

    implying necessity, which angers Coriolanus and causes him to make an insulting and vicious speech in an attempt to indicate his power over them. In Act 3, Scene 3, a similar event takes place, where again Sicinius provokes Coriolanus into a furious rage by calling him a 'traitor'.

  2. Taking into consideration of the language and structure of the play, how would you ...

    not only do we get the prophesizing and the language of cursing, but we also get the use of animal imagery again. Margaret calls Richard a "dog", "hog" and a "bunch-back toad"; all of these are very negative images. Here Shakespeare is questioning nature, as these animals are things of

  1. The contrast between Hotspur and Hal is the main theme in Henry IV part ...

    Glendower continues talking about how he is magical. Here Hotspur shows his impetuous side by saying to Glendower, "let me not understand you then: Speak it in Welsh", meaning that no men speaks better Welsh (talks nonsense and brags). Hotspur doesn't like the way Glendower uses rhetoric relentlessly.

  2. Richard III, explore the way Shakespeare shapes an audience's response to Richard

    From his soliloquy, he has admitted to us that he would eliminate anyone who stood in his way when attempting to secure his position on the throne; and so now he makes it his priority to ensure that he will carry this act through with no repentance -- he tells his two executioners 'Do not hear him plead..'

  1. Consider How Shakespeare Presents and Develops the Character of Prince Hal and Hotspur In ...

    It's clear that there are problems as the writer of the letter, who's identity we never learn is refusing to join Hotspur's rebellion and now Hotspur knows for sure that the author of the letter will tell the king of the rebellion.

  2. Comment on and analyse the role of women in the King Richard 3rd?

    Shakespeare does not use the fact that women have less power than men as one of his aims in the play, however he does use it in the way that Richard has and wants more political power whereas the women have none although what they do have is moral power which Richard has none of either.

  1. A comparison (up to the end of Act 3) of the 'courts' of Henry ...

    Hal and his court rarely used this type of speech. The only times he would use 'Blank Verse' is during speeches to the public, but also to important figures in his social areas, such as his father or visitor's of his (King Henry IV's).

  2. Coriolanus, write a critical appreciation of the following passage, (Act 1, Scene 1, 146-210) ...

    Despite his anger, he is right about the citizens in some respects. His statements foreshadow later events, like how the citizens are easily led to fulfil the wishes of the tribunes, and how he, one of Rome?s great leaders, will be unceremoniously tossed out by a mob that doesn?t know what is the best for itself.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work