• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent does Falstaffs role transcend that of a buffon in henry IV part 1

Extracts from this document...


Falstaff's role undoubtedly transcends that of a buffoon however Falstaff is also portrayed as an anarchic spirit, ready to defy any rules in order to satisfy his own appetites. Falstaff's extrovert character therefore has an inevitable affect on Hals later decisions. Shakespeare portrays Falstaff as an enormous paradox. He is a huge man, who is so quick witted and so deft at manipulating language that he remains eternally elusive. He is quick to use others and has no sense of honesty, yet he gives and inspires great affection in those around him. He is a relatively old man, yet he refuses to admit the fact. He is a knight of the realm, yet acknowledges no sense that being a knight requires of him any decorum, loyalty, or respectable behaviour. He is an enormously selfish man, but he brings out of others some of their best qualities of wit, good fellowship, and conversation. It is Possible that Shakespeare wants us to interpret Falstaff as some sort of Lord of Misrule, a figure of irrepressible energy and joyousness in life who exists as a counter to the necessary order and stability in political society. ...read more.


Shakespeare therefore deliberately portrays Falstaff in this manor to challenge the audience's perceptions and offers a more corrosive ironic counterpoint throughout the play. This quality is most evident when we explore the theme of honour. Shakespeare deliberately contrasts Hotspurs traditional concept of honour with that of Henry IV. Henrys sense of military honour permits him to have several other knights dress up in his royal armour and impersonate him on the battlefield, so that his enemies will wear themselves out chasing and fighting the wrong person. From Henry's point of view, this is clever military strategy, an efficient policy at work; from Hotspur's point of view it is a denial of what true honour requires, which is not something politically efficient but something deeply personal, a manifestation of one's true character. From Falstaff's point of view, all honour which requires one to run the risk of losing one's life is absurd. In fact, any sense of honour which holds one back from seizing a good opportunity to enrich oneself is merely an empty word, to which he is not prepared to pay attention. ...read more.


If the king and the lords are lying, stealing, and deceiving, why shouldn't he? At least the scale of his operations is much smaller. Moreover, Shakespeare portrays him as quite candid about what he is doing and does not attempt to justify his actions as somehow morally defensible (except in mock justifications which parody the official language of the court). In fact, his impersonation of them, his appropriation of their high-toned language for satiric purposes, reminds us constantly of the hypocrisy of their special pleading. He has a capacity to bring joy to others, to make them laugh, to inspire their affections, in a manner quite impossible in the royal court. That's why the presence of Falstaff is much more subversive than a sentimental picture of him might suggest. He candidly acknowledges what he does and why he does it and our knowledge of what is happening on the larger scale doesn't give us the solid assurances we need to deal with Falstaff as we might wish. Shakespeare uses Falstaff as a manifestation of ones self. An appropriate counterweight used to encourage us to question the morality of others in the play and maybe even the morality of our own society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Henry V section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Henry V essays

  1. who in your opinion is the true hero of Henry the fourth part 1

    Because he is a criminal, his promises seem invalid, however the audience feels an element of trust because Shakespeare portrays Hal as the exciting loveable rogue. Shakespeare uses the soliloquy as an opportunity to allow the audience an insight into Hal's redemption plan.

  2. Comment on and analyse the role of women in the King Richard 3rd?

    again the repetition of son and Edward can represent the life that they have/had and the fact that they are already so much alike. The fact that Shakespeare has let women have the power of curses and that is it shows a little sexism but it portrays the women as

  1. Coriolanus is a man of action who is finally defeated by words. To what ...

    implying necessity, which angers Coriolanus and causes him to make an insulting and vicious speech in an attempt to indicate his power over them. In Act 3, Scene 3, a similar event takes place, where again Sicinius provokes Coriolanus into a furious rage by calling him a 'traitor'.


    Falstaff seems to be the only character who can, to a degree, escape the confines of his past. This is mainly due to his nature, and his ability to escape from situations relying on his wit. Throughout his relationship with Doll Tearsheet it would appear that Falstaff had made many

  1. The contrast between Hotspur and Hal is the main theme in Henry IV part ...

    Glendower continues talking about how he is magical. Here Hotspur shows his impetuous side by saying to Glendower, "let me not understand you then: Speak it in Welsh", meaning that no men speaks better Welsh (talks nonsense and brags). Hotspur doesn't like the way Glendower uses rhetoric relentlessly.

  2. Discuss Shakespeare's portrayal of Hal in Henry IV Part One.

    Hotspur is a very valiant warrior who has won a great reputation for himself on the battlefield. He is young and impetuous as his name suggests. Hal is young, foolish and immature; He is a poor opponent for Hotspur and Hotspur has nothing but disrespect for Hal.

  1. To what extent does the tragedy of Titus Andronicus unfold from the protagonist and ...

    Titus' support then leads Saturninus to choose Lavinia as his future empress. In the Hopkins interpretation of the play we see Bassianus and Lavinia together, and so immediately we know of Titus' awareness of their relationship, Titus' hesitance leads to the impression that he would object to the arrangement however

  2. Write a dramatic monologue in the style of Aaron reflecting on the motivation for ...

    Titus having slain his son is looked down upon by Aaron, who from my eyes of the play is the sociopath. Me using the word ?sociopath? in this way shows that Aaron himself may not know that other people may class him as the sociopath; to him he is just

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work