• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why George Orwell's Down and Out in Paris and London is an effective piece of social commentary

Extracts from this document...


Examine with close textual reference the literary factors which make Orwell's Down and Out in Paris and London an effective piece of social commentary. Down and Out in Paris and London is George Orwell's personal account of living in poverty in both cities. It begins in Paris, where Orwell lived for two years surviving by giving English lessons and contributing reviews and articles to various periodicals. Two years later, Orwell moved to London, where, along with writing and tutoring, he worked as a bookshop assistant, an experience which was to inform his later novel Keep the Aspidistra Flying. It was first published in 1933. He offered it as a record of experience, organised rather than fictionalised, and as a demonstration of how to destroy prejudice. This was all of a specifically social purpose that he saw in the book, it arose naturally from the facts he described. There is no gulf between fact, observation and message. No secondary or irrelevant interest interferes with the lucid presentation of detail, and the sustained tone of combined intellectual concern, emotional sympathy and unbiased detachment drives his words clearly. This essay will examine what literary factors George Orwell employed to make Down and Out in Paris and London a social commentary on Paris and London in the 1930's. ...read more.


He becomes 'one', a generalised being whom he is regarding along with other details. It is a personal experience viewed with thorough detachment. The result of this detachment is that when Orwell comes to make a subjective statement we accept it without thought. We accept the statement that the hotel was 'homelike' and Madame F. a 'good sort' in spite of what our own reactions might have been. This is most important achievement of the social commentator, to prevent his reader from accepting some facts while questioning others. Orwell does this by not emphasising the particularly shocking or the particularly unusual any more than he emphasis the trivial or the questionable. Here it is not of fundamental importance in itself whether the hotel was indeed 'homelike', but the fact that Orwell does not allow us to disbelieve it is at the very basis of his success as a social commentator. Orwell shows how demoralising poverty is, and how subjectively damaging. It shrinks a man to 'only a belly with a few accessory organs' and the more limited means of existence the less able a man becomes to resist or fight against circumstances. This has two effects. It deprives one of the necessity of being responsible, of paying attention to anything apart from the avoidance of starvation, and it cuts one off from that vast area of worry and concern that ...read more.


Orwell appeals to his readers' sense of decency. He does not have to add a message to his descriptions; the message is present in the language and the story itself. Though, at the end of Down and Out he gives us a brief, matter-of-fact chapter consolidating his material and offering some suggestions as to what could be done to help vagrants. He moves out of his role as observer with no change of tone. Far from our being disturbed by his blunt, "I want to set down some general remarks about tramps' (Orwell, 1933, page 203) it adds force to what he has to say, for he already established his credibility. Orwell's Down and Out, while not being the first book of its kind, was something of a phenomenon. Even when social commentary was at its height in Britain there was little that was genuinely muckraking in the sense that the author decided to investigate and write up a situation by becoming involved in it. Those, who did joined armies and causes, they did not, usually, join miners and factory workers, still less those on the dole. Orwell by gritting his teeth, and it is fairly clear that he did not enjoy living on bread and margarine or his stay at the spikes, battered his way, inevitably a little blindly, into foreign situations. While some admired him for it, others resented the fact that he had courage as well as conviction. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Synoptic Paper section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Synoptic Paper essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    1984 fifty years on - in what respects has the fictitious future vision of ...

    4 star(s)

    Although the modern TV's can be switched off and the Party members can't observe us through them, Orwell wouldn't probably have been surprised by the fact that in 1984 the average American household spent over 7 hours in front of the television every evening.

  2. George Orwell, one of English literatures most important and famous writers, draws the picture ...

    Hence, it would be far easier for the party to have full control over its citizens. While language plays a major role in shifting people's thoughts to fit in the Totalitarian regime, another striking aspect of the novel is the theme of how certain ideologies can be imposed on people.

  1. 1984 Orwell

    turned to left-wing ideals and he went to fight for the Republican forces in the Spanish war. The experience in Spain made him aware of the political threats that could destroy left-wing ideals; he was horrified of the result of Realpolitik.

  2. GEORGE ORWELL A comparative study of Burmese Days, Animal Farm and Nineteen Eighty- ...

    Orwell joined the militia of the POUM (partido Obrero de Unificaciļæ½n de Marxista), which was associated with the British Labour Party. For the first time in his life socialism seemed reality, something for which it was worth fighting for. Orwell received a basic military training and was send to the front on Aragon, near Zaragoza.

  1. George Orwell - "Shooting an Elephant" (1936).

    At which point Orwell does go out "to see what was happening" - but out of curiosity, not duty. When a list of things that the elephant has done is presented, some of them fairly serious, they are ordered in such a way as to make them seem irrelevant, through anti-climax.

  2. How far does 1984 reflect the times in which it was written and how ...

    This is a complete contradiction to the lives of the Russian citizens under Stalin or the German people during Hitler's rein and indeed the population of nineteen eighty four had little opportunity to feel safe. The naming of other characters within his novel, I suspect, had a deeper meaning.

  1. thrpugh the character and actions of Napoleon Orwell paints a picture of brutal tyranny, ...

    This shows more cunning on Napoleons' part as he is making the animals work harder by manipulating them. Napoleon's actions aren't for the benefit of the other animals or indeed the farm. His bullying tactics are shown when the hens didn't want him to take their eggs.

  2. How does Orwell tell the story in Chapter 10 of Animal Farm?

    lists and figures and ?important paperwork? were all false but we see the events from the animals point of view which creates tension through the ironic continuation of faith which the animals have. If Orwell had used an independent or third person narrative, it would have ?separated? the audience from the animals.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work