• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate Shakespeares portrayal of Nature and loyalty in King Lear up to Act 2 Scene 1?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Evaluate Shakespeare?s portrayal of Nature and loyalty in King Lear up to Act 2 Scene 1? The theme of nature pervades King Lear throughout, and forms a large basis of the topic of the play. It is thanks to the idea of nature that we can see the characteristics of characters, for instance the degree of their loyalty, and their progression throughout the play in relation to their belief of ?nature?. Nature, however, in King Lear can be a complex matter, and is best divided into three main areas. There is ?Nature? in itself, essentially seen as a force more powerful (perhaps omnipotent), by some characters and ?removed? from the human world. Then there is ?nature?- that is the nature of characters and their personalities, and finally the ?natural?- the characters? own individual view whether something is in their eyes ?natural? or not. These three sub-topics heavily inter-link with each other during the play, and essentially help constitute each other too. However, ?nature? on its own is harmless. It is human influence that creates the disharmony that mentions of ?nature? appear to portray. It is therefore first appropriate to explain how ?nature? first causes such unrest. The opening dialogue of the opening scene introduces us to Gloucester?s view of what is natural or not. ?I have so often blushed to acknowledge him?the whoreson must be acknowledged? lets us know that, although accepting that Gloucester by blood his own son, he believes in the natural order and therefore sees his son Edmund as illegitimate and a bastard. ...read more.

Middle

The ?battle? of malign versus benign nature best defines and groups the contrasting ?natures? in the play, and categorising the characters into these groups is important in ascertaining the motives, and loyalty, of the characters. From the evidence we can draw in the opening scene we can categorise Cordelia?s nature as ?good?. She does not use false, wholly empty flattery to attempt to please her father: ?Love, and be silent? is a genuine display of love for her father, and evidences her integrity and loyalty, to which Lear is sadly blind. Gonerill and Regan, after stating their plot to ?do something i?theat?, are essentially directly contrasted to their benevolent sister and therefore are malign characters. The animal imagery that is associated with them- ?wolvish visage..serpent?s sooth? indicate the unnaturalness of their behaviour in comparison to how they should behave if they observed the natural social order. Edmund?s reaction to Gloucester?s assertion of the ?natural order? most definitely makes him the ?bad?, or ?evil? and disloyal character, his deceitful letter highlighting his malcontent, and his Machiavellian character (based on writer Niccolo Machiavelli?s 16th century character, who took delight in their own manipulative evil and were synonymous with the devil). Kent and the Fool, the only other ?major? characters in Act I, have a loyal and good nature- their common goal is to help Lear achieve insight, and prevent the evil that the malign-natured characters are trying to impose. ...read more.

Conclusion

Gloucester?s stubborn belief in the ?nature? of his sons not only causes his downfall in the long run, but is also used against him as a method to undermine him further; this belief in the natural order clearly does him no favours. The irony is almost needless to be mentioned- Edmund, through his acting, pretends to hold the same view that his father does by classifying Edgar as unnatural, though it is this brandishing of whether a character is natural or not that Edmund loathes, and is in fact is actually the central reason for his rise against his father. Gloucester?s blind nature of course means that he is truly fooled, and as as a result misplaces his loyalty into Edmund by stating he is a ?loyal and natural boy?- dramatically ironic as we know the true extent of Edmund?s loyalty. This bold and malign nature of Edmund reflects and is explained by what he sees ?Nature? as. His claim in his second scene soliloquy- ?Nature art my goddess?- highlights how he sees Nature as a more powerful force, and a motivator, or motivation to drive him forward in his evil ways. He has a theory of his own nature- ?the maidenliest star?twinkled on my bastardisig? ?that his nature would have been evil whatever star he was born under- and this epitomises his self-motivated character. Also, what makes him especially fearful is the fact that instead of accepting a god, he adopts nature as his god, suggesting that his evil may be without limits. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level King Lear section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level King Lear essays

  1. King Lear - A commentary on Edmund's soliloquy in Act I Scene ii.

    In contrast to this Edmund paints the conception of a legitimate child as a mundane routine task, ""the creating of a whole tribe of fops/Got 'tween sleep and wake." By referring to legitimate children as "fops" or fools he is making bastards out to be better than them, using the

  2. Explore the presentation of Edmund in 'King Lear'

    Again the love and trust between a father and a dutiful child are soured. In Act III Scene iii, Gloucester reveals to Edmund his distress at the cruelty of Goneril, Regan and Cornwall. He is disturbed at their command that he, the master of the house, should not comfort the King.

  1. How does Shakespeare present Edmund in King Lear?

    Edmund being his patriotic self sees it as his duty to restore power to an honourable man, he realises that King Lear as become delirious and his father is also too old. So Edmund takes it upon his shoulders to install himself as ruler of Britain in order to guide them through a time of turmoil.

  2. Close Analysis of Act 3 Scene 4 of King Lear

    An example of Lear's rage as a strong king is when he insults Gonerill: "[Lear] (1:4:277)Into her womb convey sterility!.../A babe to honour her!" this shows that women's role in Shakespearean society was to bear children even though Gonerill is the king's daughter this is seen as her only purpose.

  1. With particular reference to Act 1, Scene 1, show how Shakespeare presents the character ...

    Shakespeare has introduced this technique here to make the audience sympathise with Cordelia. It is this significant connection with the audience that compels them to support and feel for Cordelia throughout the entire play, as if they have established, already, a bond with the character.

  2. Comparing and contrasting both the characters of Edmund and Edgar In king Lear.

    Now gods stand up for bastards". This is dramatic irony. Edmund wants to show every one that bastards can come out on top and he can achieve more than his brother. He wants to inherit from his father because he doesn't think its fare that Edgar should have the lot and him to be left with nothing.

  1. How does Shakespeare create a sense of unease in Act 1 Scene 1 of ...

    Gonerill and Regan?s two highly over-exaggerated comments of their unconditional and unmatched love of their father certainly makes it apparent that what is being said is not genuine- it is rather a feigned act only constructed to try to impress, and ?win?.

  2. The Nature of Redemption and the Limits of Pessimism in King Lear

    Bradley is certainly not alone in thinking that ?painful feelings? are an obstacle to aesthetic worth, and so I imagine that the majority of readers would identify strongly with his interpretation of the play. Widespread as this conviction is, however, it cannot claim any substantive measure of justification.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work