• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the ways in which the relationship between the public and the police is presented in Hare's "Murmuring Judges".

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Examine the ways in which the relationship between the public and the police is presented in this extract and elsewhere in the play. In Murmuring Judges, the second play in Hare?s trilogy which examines institutions, Hare presents the relationship between the police and the public as one of mutual dislike. Interestingly, Hare never openly shows the public to dislike the lawyers, who act as the antagonist throughout the play due to their uncaring attitude towards client, but it is omnipresent towards the police, who are shown to be more in touch with people. Here, Hare is perhaps consciously suggesting that the people dislike the police as they are the ?face of justice? and thus perceived by the public to be the ?enemy?. Although Hare does present the police to hold some racist and prejudiced views, showing they clearly aren?t perfect, he does largely present the police in both Murmuring Judges and his research book Asking Around as trying to do a hard job in difficult times. From our first introduction to the police, we see they are instantly disliked by the public. In Act 1 Scene 3, the first to involve the police, Keith states ?you?re all bloody bastards? which immediately creates sympathy from the audience for the police. ...read more.

Middle

However, Hare continues to present the police as ?the good guys?, as he shows Lester to be ?only interested in protecting the public?, which reinforces the idea that police frustration largely stems from the public. Despite the public perception of the police as ?tossers?, the police are wholly presented as the most in touch with people and the most realistic, ?what we?re talking about here is reality?. This is best shown in the juxtaposition of the lawyers and the police?s view of public interest. Whereas Sir Peter believes ?everyone listens to Desert Island Disks?, which the is obviously untrue, as this is a largely middle class radio station and shows the lawyers to be completely out of touch with the public, Lester states ?I?d rather be in bed with Michelle Pfeiffer.? This is a much more relatable statement for the public, as it is likely that there is a larger proportion of people who would rather be in bed with Michelle than there is who listen to Desert Island Disks. Through this direct contrast, Hare shows the lawyers to be dated whereas the police are presented as realistic, and with the same manner and feelings as the public, which can be exemplified by the ...read more.

Conclusion

Just as the public are shown to be aware of racism within the police, sexism is also obvious as Sandra says ?just ask the boys, all women are naggers?. However, I believe this may have been inherent and gone unnoticed by the police, as perfectly summed up in the line ?they don?t know they?re prejudiced?, as the play was written in 1991, when racism and sexism were seen as everyday occurrences. Hare describes the police as ?the people trying to keep their sense of humour in the face of massive contradictions?. This is evident in the relationship between the police and the public, as the police generally use a light tone and humorous phrases, which suggests the police would like to get along with the public, but they make this impossible. This is strengthened by Hare?s presentation of the public, as they are shown to be non-cooperative or ?grovelling?. In contrast, Hare occasionally presents the police as prejudiced and disinterested in their jobs, which undermines the police-public relationship, but it is largely obvious that Hare blames the public for the poor public relations as the police are largely just attempting to do their job in difficult circumstances, which is only worsened by the public perception of them as unjust and prejudiced. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Play Writes section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Play Writes essays

  1. Murmuring Judges

    You're juggling with air, pure and simple. And these are the cases where I seem to do well.' Irina tells him that their client has been beaten up in prison which he already knew, but seems quite unconcerned about. He flippantly says 'Touch anything criminal and there's always a mess.'

  2. Scene by scene analysis of "Equus"

    The horseman said to Alan that he build a ?terrific castle?. But Alan gives all his attention to other things, in this case to the horse. From this moment, Alan didn?t say any word to the horseman anymore. He just nodded and let his desire free run.

  1. Hare uses juxtaposition throughout Murmuring Judges to show the seemingly inherent differences in class ...

    the suggestion that ?[the students] have to eat their way through twenty four dinners? reveals the recklessness of the system in terms of man, which clearly suggests there is money to be thrown around. Hare also uses food in other moments in the play reflect the lower classes of the police and the prisoners.

  2. In Murmuring Judges, David Hare uses Barry to represent the stereotypical bent policemen that ...

    Increasingly, Barry is presented as a misogynist and a racist throughout the play, not only towards Sandra but also towards Irina and Gerard. This attitude is shown through the dialogue between Barry and Irina on pg101; ?I don?t take lectures? towards Irina suggests he sees her as beneath him.

  1. How does Hare convey the changes in Gerard McKinnon 's state of mind during ...

    The audience realise that Gerard is losing hope very rapidly and the thought of winning the appeal looks very bleak. This is illustrated when Gerard says, ?Calm down, Gerard. Don?t get excited.? This shows that Gerard does not want to give into false hope.

  2. The Presentation of the Legal Establishment in "Murmuring Judges" by David Hare.

    The legal establishment are also shown to be highly sexist, so much that they blatantly disregard Irina right in front of her, making fun of her in a slyly obvious way. This is reflected in the language used in the play, as Hare has written ?Irina is standing one dutiful pace behind her silk.? (Act One, Scene Two, p.4.)

  1. Comment on Sherriff's presentation of Stanhope in the first two acts of Journey's End.

    over the lack of pepper in the soup. It is somewhat unclear whether this is merely caused by reaction to Raleigh?s presence?the extent to which it has disturbed Stanhope is again shown with the ?forced gaity? with which he orders the others to sit down?or is his usual attitude.

  2. Through the selection of three characters in 'Journey's End' examine how Sherriff presents human ...

    face"), though Stanhope's weaknesses seem to be half concealed, hence why the pallor is described as being "under his skin" rather than in plain sight as Hibbert's are. Sherriff presents the audience with two conflicting images of human weakness: Hibbert, the stereotypically weak man, and Stanhope, the seemingly strong and

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work