• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explore how Shakespeare creates humour for the audience in the scenes in which the wives humiliate Falstaff.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explore how Shakespeare creates humour for the audience in the scenes in which the wives humiliate Falstaff Through history, there have been many explanations at to why Shakespeare wrote the "Merry Wives of Windsor". Some have argued that the play was written for the Garter Ceremony held on April 23, 1597, when the patron of Shakespeare's company, Lord Hudson, was installed; supposedly, the play was later revised for public performance, around 1601. Shakespeare wrote the "Merry Wives of Windsor" as a comedy, however it does not obey all typical conventions of a Shakespearean comedy as noticeable differences in the plot show. Key parts of the play in which Shakespeare creates the main humour are the scenes in which the wives manage to humiliate and deceive Falstaff, a fat knight with a devious mind and inflated ego. A convention used repeatedly in this play to create verbal, and physical humour, is disguise and misunderstanding. Within the category of disguise and misunderstanding comes incongruity and ironic knowledge. In act 3, scene 3, the wives have discovered Falstaff's identical letters to them both, and have secretly planned their revenge on him. The fact that the wives received the same letters in the first place shows the audience how little Falstaff actually cared for the women, and shows his desperation. ...read more.

Middle

The hassle and aggravation of Ford's reaction was so well staged that Falstaff's brief exit to change into his disguise was almost forgotten. The parts of the wives in these two scenes are extremely important, as their innuendos are intended to be a basis for later comedy. Their lines in front of Falstaff are like another play in themselves. The audience is often meant to laugh with the wives, as Shakespeare has created these two characters to make a large part of the humour. There are examples of obvious dramatic irony in the form of hidden jokes between them, when Falstaff doesn't know Mistress Page is around, Mistress Ford refers to her as a "very tattling woman". The sheer absurdity of Falstaff's disguise as he entered on the stage, dressed as the "fat woman of Brentford" undoubtedly brought entertainment to the audience in the RSC production, and the lasting embellishment of Ford beating Falstaff with a walking stick was a great example of visual slapstick comedy. However is it not only the RSC production that chose this as a point of exuberance, Shakespeare has some obvious indications by the wives and Ford himself in the script, which suggest Ford's hate for "Mother Pratt", and the trouble that Falstaff will cause for himself. ...read more.

Conclusion

Herne the hunter is said to have been a spectral hunter and keeper in Windsor forest in medieval times. Mistress Page tells a version of the hanging of Herne the hunter earlier in the play. This part of the play is certainly very comical, as it is an deception by the wives and their husbands for Falstaff to be dressed as a "cuckold", someone who has a sexual affair out of marriage, thought in Pagan times to have grown horns and turn into part deer, part man. The final scene, when the fairies torture Falstaff, seems like a scene of comedy rather than one of grief or sympathy. There is the added hilarity of Doctor Caius and Slender whisking away the wrong person, and finding themselves marrying a boy, instead of Anne Page. The play concludes as an entirely happy ending as Ford includes "Sir John and all" in his final speech. Although this is a rather unconventional comedy in some ways, the ending still consists of the protagonist overcoming the antagonist, creating a happy ending. It is also a farce due to the improbably and ludicrous events that take place throughout. Shakespeare's great uses of comedic structures are extremely successful in creating not only a great comedy, but also one that has lasted the test of time. Charlotte Elliott 11W ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Henry V section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Henry V essays

  1. Comparison of Olivier (1944) and Branagh's (1989) screen adaptations of Henry V

    In both cases we must not forget the qualities of leadership is such a kingly role. A camera movement to prove this is used to look up at Henry. In Olivier's it is used re-emphasize his view as a model "leader of men".

  2. What are the functions of the Chorus in Shakespeare's Henry V?

    I think that Branagh's version is far more effective. The purpose of having a gap between the groups of the English and French is to create a contrast. However, I think that Shakespeare left a too longer gap. By the time you have sat through the entire chorus you begin

  1. Henry V - differences between young and old.

    It is through Hotspur, not Hal, that the poetic art of Shakespeare is most brilliantly realised in this play. An example of this surfaces in the very first scene in which Hotspur takes part, as he declares: By heavens, methinks it were an easy leap, To pluck bright honour from

  2. Does Henry V offer a patriotic version of Henry's campaigns on the surface while ...

    This is in stark contrast to the lines in the chorus speech which I made reference to earlier. The king has not comforted his troops at all but annoyed one of them and does not call all his troops countrymen as the speech suggests but actually when it comes one

  1. Henry V - Compare the relationship between Hal and Falstaff in two different scenes

    In the speech between Hal and the King, Hal said, "I shall hereafter, my thrice-gracious lord, Be more myself." This was Hal's vow to change for his dad. Now is the time that he needs to leave Falstaff behind and become who he really meant to be.

  2. Explore Shakespeare's presentation of Hal and Falstaff in the tavern in Act II Scene ...

    either as someone who we feel sorry for, because he is going to have to be king and doesn't want to, or he could be presented as devious and cunning, and rejects his friends when he doesn't want them and is just making up excuses for spending a lot of time in the tavern.

  1. The Subplot: Consider the significance of the subplot and examine Shakespeare's dramatic use of ...

    overall Henry is a controversial king and the subplot remind the viewer that he is not a wholly moral person. The sub plot gives the play structure and serves to give light relief and to give time for the other characters to costume change, so that the characters can change into armour for the battles and such like.

  2. "Falstaff is a dreadful character in every way yet the audience cannot help but ...

    Using people is one of Falstaff's main faults, he has an almost father/son relationship with Hal. However this relationship is not filled with mutual respect, no doubt Falstaff hopes that his fraternizing with the young Prince will mean a pay-off in titles, money, and prestige when Hal comes into power.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work