• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explore the presentation of Edmund in 'King Lear'

Extracts from this document...


Explore the presentation of Edmund in 'King Lear' There is all the difference in the world between the evil of Goneril and Regan - dour, stark, and mean-minded - and the evil of Edmund, which has an almost magnificent vitality and elegance. His first appearance in Act 1 reveals all; scorns traditional attitude, establishing himself as a crusader in the cause of amorality. There is tremendous energy and vigour here; martial fidelity and family ties are swept aside. Self-confident and poised, for Edmund a man is what makes himself, especially 'by wit'. His pride in his cunning is justified; Edgar and Gloucester are slickly manipulated, while Cornwall and Regan are smoothly incorporated into his plans other people are there to be used; he uses, when suited, Goneril and Regan against each other. Yet nobody is allowed to use him, as we see when he fights shy of Goneril's suggestion that he should murder Albany. Such single mindedness makes him a successful military leader, concerned with results and not the niceties of principle. Yet we must beware of glamourising this dangerous man, and remind ourselves that he does callously abuse those who are closest to him. He delivers Gloucester into the hands of Cornwall and Regan; he later rides out to apply the final murderous thrust to his own father; he calmly orders the execution of Lear and Cordeila. He is attractive in his zest, perhaps, yet lethally unscrupulous. ...read more.


But his willingness to betray his father indicates just how much he sees other people merely as instruments to be manipulated to his own ends. Edmund claims that the letter is written by Edgar; the letter complains that the young are denied their inheritance for too long, and suggests that Edgar and Edmund should meet to discuss this. Gloucester takes the bait and curses Edgar, whom Edmund pretends to defend, suggesting an arranged test of his loyalty. We see the transition to prose for the conversational exchanges - and Edmund's masterly pose as the respectful son. His performance with the letter is compelling; allowing a brief sight to arouse curiosity, feigning unwillingness to reveal the contents while hinting at their sinisterness, and pretending to defend Edgar, yet blackening his name. The letter focuses upon a central theme; the transfer of power and wealth from the old to the young. It is re-emphasised in Edgar's alleged view that 'sons at perfect age, and fathers declined, the father should be as ward to the son, and the son manage his revenue'. The views, of course, are Edmund's, and will find a harsh echo in the mouths of Goneril and Regan. After the exit of Gloucester, Edmund's philosophy is again projected in his scathing dismissal of his father's beliefs. For him, the stars have no significance; man is what he makes himself, no more, no less. This adds point to his cynical aping of his father after the entry of Edgar. ...read more.


and his capable management of his own fate. The reader comes to deplore Edmund's means, but, hoping for a redemption of Edmund and grasping for a positive message from the play, the reader sees compassion in Edmund's final words, compassion that likely does not exist. Of all of the play's villains, Edmund is the most complex and sympathetic. He is a consummate schemer, a Machiavellian character eager to seize any opportunity and willing to do anything to achieve his goals. However, his ambition is interesting insofar as it reflects not only a thirst for land and power but also a desire for the recognition denied to him by his status as a bastard. His serial treachery is not merely self-interested; it is a conscious rebellion against the social order that has denied him the same status as Gloucester's legitimate son, Edgar. He is the ultimate self-made man, and he is such a cold and capable villain that it is entertaining to watch him work. Only at the close of the play does Edmund show a flicker of weakness. Mortally wounded, he sees that both Goneril and Regan have died for him, and whispers, "Yet Edmund was beloved". After this ambiguous statement, he seems to repent of his villainy and admits to having ordered Cordelia's death. His peculiar change of heart (rare among Shakespearean villains) is enough to make the audience wonder, amid the carnage, whether Edmund's villainy sprang not from some innate cruelty but simply from a thwarted, misdirected desire for the familial love that he witnessed around him. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level King Lear section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level King Lear essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Consider the role of the Fool in King Lear. How important is he ...

    4 star(s)

    He gains independence from Lear, rising above his role of fool in society that his intelligence seen deserves. Overall Lear's Fool is quite close to the real Fools who were a feature of Renaissance courts. He is 'all-licensed', privileged, to joke at the expense of the powerful (Doubtless, that is

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The influence Act 1 has on the rest of the play in King Lear

    3 star(s)

    against evil (Goneril and Regan). We later see Caius; Kent in disguise put in the stocks by Regan, and this explores another tragic force as the physicality of the stocks are low to the ground, near to floor which is the lowest of the low, and I think Caius represents

  1. In Shakespeare's King Lear, the Fools main function is to play three major roles. ...

    as like this as a crab does to a crab," meaning that Regan and Goneril are of the same nature and that there is no need for him to go to her after Goneril has rejected his knights (Act1, Scene 5, line 18).

  2. Explore the ways in which Shakespeare presents the characters of Edmund and Edgar in ...

    "Kent, sir, the banish'd Kent; who in disguise Follow'd his enemy king, and did him service Improper for a slave." By giving the character longer lines where once he had little, shows that he has more to say and is more confident.

  1. How does Shakespeare present Edmund in King Lear?

    The role of the character can tell the audience a lot about their attitudes and intentions. Edmund represents an outcast and unlike Lear or Gloucester Edmund refuses to pander to the needs of society, he has been raised as an outcast (as he is illegitimate)

  2. Explore the ways in which Shakespeare presents the characters of Goneril, Regan and Cordelia ...

    Goneril and Regan discuss their father in a very disrespectful manner. This proves that their earlier declarations of love were but false and empty words. By the amount of lines Shakespeare attributed to each of them, the audience can clearly see that Goneril is the more dominant of the two.

  1. An Examination of the Significance of the Fool in King Lear

    better than a fool and would therefore be entitled to wear a Fool's cap. The Fool by his canny remark means that, by having given his entire kingdom to two of his daughters, he had made them absolutely independent and had in this way lost their love and obedience.

  2. The Nature of Redemption and the Limits of Pessimism in King Lear

    posits that aesthetic value may be found in terrifying and overwhelming experiences. Of course, it is true that the classical understanding of sublimity refers to natural beauty rather than (human) artworks, but all the same, there is no prima facie reason to think that every appellation of beauty must be strictly segregated according to some artificial categorization of experience.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work