• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explore your relationship with the wife of bath

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explore your relationship with the Wife of Bath "Gilbert and Gubar see the wife of bath as a independent character who stands for female supremacy in a misogynistic time." " Hanson reminds the audience that the wife is a fictive creation of Chaucer, a man with little empathetic knowledge of women." This essay is going to explore my relationship with the Wife of Bath, bearing both critical viewpoints in mind. Chaucer exploits the notion of the female stereotype in his creation of the Wife of Bath. The misogynist's idea of women as a source of all trouble and evil is an important one. This idea came from the Old Testament, where Eve ate the apple and succeeded in getting herself, Adam and all their descendants expelled from paradise. This story remained influential throughout the middle ages, where women were seen as weak and unintelligent, fond of causing trouble and bound to make any man miserable who was foolish enough to marry them. During this time period, women had little status within society. However, the wife achieves her "authority" through marriage, by manipulating men to get what she wants, namely money and sex. Wives were thought to be nagging, vicious, and yet in complete subordination to their husbands. The wife knows that women are supposed to be irrational, stubborn and emotional whilst men are supposed to be calm, rational and reasonable. ...read more.

Middle

However, I think that this makes the wife seem entertaining and intriguing. Chaucer gives the wife a number of techniques, which help her to win her arguments. However, he does not let her become too clever, as some of her arguments are convincing and others less so. The wife uses many techniques, such as fast-talking, reversing the argument, or even interpreting the bible to suit her own purpose. One point that I think that the wife makes convincing is when she uses human biology to support her argument. She argues that the theologians say that the reproductive organs were invented so that the bladder could be emptied and so that a male could be differentiated from a female. However, the wife knows that this cannot be the whole story, as the bible says that a husband must "pay his marriage debt" to his wife in bed. Therefore, sexual organs must have a pleasurable purpose too. However, I think that the wife uses this argument to justify her excessive sexual needs and that if the bible requires a "marriage debt" she will make sure that it is paid very often. One argument that I find less convincing is the wife's advice on how to handle husbands The Wife of bath is not ashamed to admit she exerted power and authority over her first three husbands She considers the first three as good men, who were wealthy but too old to satisfy the Wife's voracious sexual appetite. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, after reading her prologue my opinions have changed frequently. At times, I feel that the wife makes some convincing and logical arguments, such as using human biology to back up her point. At other times, I feel that her arguments are less convincing, and that she uses her arguments purely to try and justify her excessive indulgence of sexual desire. I find the prologue and tale of the Wife of Bath interesting in the fact that a medieval piece of literature with such a feministic message was written by a man in the misogynistic era that Chaucer lived in. Some feminist critics, such as Susan Crane and Catherine S. Cox, view her as destined to fail in her search for equality, partly because she is trying to gain 'acceptance by emulating men instead of embracing her femininity, but mainly because she is a fictional character, written by a man'. Similarly, Hanson reminds the audience " that the wife is a fictive creation of Chaucer, a man with little empathetic knowledge of women." Most critics agree that the Wife of Bath is Chaucer's most vivid and realistic creation, yet at the same time she is the character perhaps most thoroughly constructed from literary sources. I would agree with these viewpoints to some extent as I think that the wife is unable to see that her tactic simply reinforces all the stereotypical medieval ideas about women as cruel, emotional and sexually voracious. Chaucer is, therefore, seen as reinforcing anti-feminist views rather than undermining them. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Geoffrey Chaucer section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Geoffrey Chaucer essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "A shockingly cynical picture". In the light of this comment, discuss the Wife of ...

    4 star(s)

    The cunningness of all this lies in the fact that she insists, with Jankin and her niece as her witnesses, that they behaved like this "in hir dronkenesse". Her husbands therefore felt guilty and she was able to manipulate them.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent does the Pardoner manipulate his audience?

    4 star(s)

    We know that the Pardoner never preaches but for compensation; we can assume that the tale he tells is a standard script from his fundraising repertoire.

  1. English society of Chaucer's time

    Even if the friar or pardoner were corrupt, giving to charity or buying a papal pardon could still help get you into heaven or at least knock a few thousand years off your stay in purgatory. Also, just because a friar or monk was a less-than-sterling example of his station, the social position itself still commanded respect.

  2. The pardoners prologue and Tale show human nature to lack any redeeming virtues ...

    leads to death portrays human nature to lack any redeeming virtues and illustrates people as being greedy, weak and hypocritical. Despite the majority of the prologue proving that human nature lacks any redeeming virtues through the construction of the pardoner and the three rioters, it can be argued that there

  1. Chaucer creates humour by satirising values in religious and courtly love. To what extent ...

    This ignorant request seems to show an element of fate, humorous in nature, on the rest of the tale, and satirizes the church for its own misuse of religion. No one present at the wedding seems to be fooled; everyone is laughing, but not necessarily for the right reasons, 'Ther is swich mirthe-that it may nat be written'.

  2. According to what principles, and for what purposes, do Twentieth Century women-writers revise and ...

    By actively burning his clothes she 'condemn [s] him to wolfishness' (p.113) a state, which to the girl seems preferable to 'manishness.' Alice and the girl in 'The Company of Wolves' both reside in the realms between childhood and adulthood, on the brink of sexual maturity; between the virgin-child and the 'fallen woman' of Perrault's tale.

  1. How appropriate is it that the character of the Pardoner tells the tale?

    The tale is addressed to three audiences. Firstly, the pilgrims who are physically with the pardoner as he tells his tale. Secondly, are the gullible and impressionable, which the pardoner preaches to and they accept everything that he says. Finally, there is the modern or contemporary audience.

  2. Select two or three portraits from the General Prologue and discuss Chaucer's use of ...

    To show that the monk as an even more unworthy character he is alos depicted as someone who finds himself very important but it is displayed in must less subtle way.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work