'Fools rush into my head, and so I write' (Satire II.i, l.4). Discuss the role of satire in the work of Pope and Swift.

Authors Avatar

200127734

Milton to Johnson

Marcus Walsh

9 December 2004.

'Fools rush into my head, and so I write' (Satire II.i, l.4).Discuss the role of satire in the work of Pope and Swift.

Satire can be defined as trenchant wit, irony, or sarcasm used to expose and discredit vice or folly, it seems a contradiction in terms to say that satire need have no moral lesson or didactic purpose, for the essence of satire seems to be aggression or criticism, and criticism implies a systematic measure of good and bad.  An object is criticised because it falls short of some standard which the critic desires that it should reach.  Inseparable from any definition of satire is its corrective purpose, expressed through a critical mode which ridicules or otherwise attacks those conditions needing reformation in the opinion of the satirist.

The genre of satire is arguably different from most other criticism in that satire's ultimate aim is to improve human institutions or humanity through a combination of criticism and humour.  As the text of Gulliver's Travels reveals, Swift is self-consciously aware of this higher moral purpose.  His intent is explicitly laid out in ‘A Letter from Captain Gulliver to His Cousin Sympson,’ which introduces the novel.  In this document, the fictitious Gulliver airs some of Swift's own dissatisfaction with the changes made to his original manuscript by his publisher Benjamin Motte, who did so in the interest of political discretion.  Due to the politically sensitive material contained in the manuscript, the work was initially published anonymously.  In the ‘Letter’ Gulliver laments that while his original purpose in publishing the book was for the public good, as a result of the changes made to the manuscript without his consent, not a single of his desired effects has come to pass.  Thus, by denying the intended effect, Swift in fact is able to reinstate his satirical intent.

Accordingly, the best definitions of satire should be formulated from a combination of its corrective intent and its literary method of execution.  A reasonable definition of satire, then, is a literary manner which blends a critical attitude with humour and wit to the end that human institutions or humanity may be improved.  The best satire does not seek to do harm or damage by its ridicule but rather it seeks to create a shock of recognition and to make vice repulsive so that the vice will be expunged from the person or society under attack or from the person or society intended to benefit by the attack.  Far from being simply destructive, satire is implicitly constructive, and the satirists often depict themselves as such constructive critics.  In his ‘Verses on the Death of Dr. Swift,’ for example, Swift denies any malicious intent in his works, and affirms his purpose was correction:

As with a moral View design'd
To cure the Vices of Mankind:
His vein, ironically grave,
Expos'd the Fool, and lash'd the Knave.  
Yet, Malice never was his Aim;
He lash'd the Vice but spar'd the Name.  
No Individual could resent,
Where Thousands equally were meant.  
His Satyr points at no Defect,
But what all Mortals may correct. . . .
                                                            (ll. 313-16, 459-64)

Ideally, the satirist would like to see a return to the practice of morality which he feels has been abandoned by society; but he is aware that not only to stop the decay of civilization but also to reverse the trend of decay and to move toward a true moral progress is almost a futile attempt, because it calls for a complete moral renewal of man, and such a renewal is virtually impossible.  So the practical hope and aim of the satirist is that his work will be sufficiently irritating to stop or at least slow down the perceived wrong doing, even though it cannot be reversed.  

In his ‘Apology’ prefixed to a Tale of a Tub in 1710, Swift says in discussing his purpose and method of this ‘useful and diverting’ satire, ‘Why should any Clergyman of our Church be angry to see the Follies of Fanaticism and Superstition exposed, tho' in the most ridiculous manner?  since that is perhaps the most probable way to cure them, or at least to hinder them from further spreading’.  Pope echoes this in a letter by saying of his satire, ‘I hope to deter, if not to reform.’  Perhaps the very nature of the society that makes the satiric approach necessary precludes much hope for a great reformation, the cynicism that so frequently surfaces in satiric works surely shows that the writers had no delusions about the effects of their writing.  Although satire intends always to be corrective, it can guarantee only to expose vice and hypocrisy, and to demonstrate the effects such vices have when allowed to continue.

Critical debate about Pope has frequently been acrimonious.  In his lifetime, Pope himself was often to blame.  As he wrote in 1733: ‘Fools rush into my head, and
so I write’
.  Unsurprisingly, the fools in question wrote back, and
much of the early comment on his work sprang more from a sense, often deserved, of personal injury than from legitimate disputes about the quality of his verse
.  However, critics were asking the more radical question, whether satire could really be poetry at all.  William Bowles, the editor of Pope's Works, argued that true poetry was marked by a poetical subject, such as the beauty of nature, whereas writing focussed on the ordinary activities of men and women in polite society was inevitably as artificial as its subject matter.  Over the next few years, an increasing number of poets and critics criticized Pope as a mere versifier rather than a true poet.

Join now!

The strongest defence of Pope came from Byron.  If there were a general wreck of English literature, he wrote to his publisher, the English would rush to save
Shakespeare and Milton, but the rest of the world would save Pope's work first,
because Pope was 'the moral poet of all civilisation'
.  Byron insisted that what others called Pope's artificiality was in truth his ‘faultlessness’.  The underlying claim in Byron's defence of Pope is that the moral authority of the verse is implicit in, bound up with, its efficiency.

The Rape of the Lock is written using the heroic couplet, for ...

This is a preview of the whole essay