For what reasons was the conduct of warfare, 1914-1918, so costly in lives?

Authors Avatar

For what reasons was the conduct of warfare, 1914-1918, so costly in lives?

        There are many reasons and factors as to why the Great War was so costly in lives.  The first of these was that this was the first imperialised war that the majority of the generals in charge of the armies had encountered.  All of the military tactics that the generals had been taught were now seen as being “old fashioned” but generals, such as Field Marshall Haig, were too stubborn to realise this.  Men on horseback were used at the start of the war, but they just didn’t stand a chance against weapons such as riffles and machine guns. Also all of the plans and advances used, especially at the start of the war, were all offensive.  However as the war grew longer it became increasingly obvious that this was not going to get anyone anywhere, and it also resulted in thousands of deaths, with little or no advance for the offensive armies.  In spite of this generals continued to order floods of men to carry on charging towards the enemy lines and they were continuously gunned down by the enemy machine guns.

Join now!

        During the war between 1914 and 1918 it became more and more obvious that it was easier to defend than to attack.  The weapons, which were developed, were more defensive.  These were weapons such as the machine gun, artillery and barbed wire.  Although barbed wire does not seem like a very useful weapon, it proved to be priceless.  For example if it was placed in front of your own trenches it was almost impossible for the opposition soldiers to get past them and into the trench.  The only way to get through the barbed wire effectively was to cut it, ...

This is a preview of the whole essay