• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

For what reasons was the conduct of warfare, 1914-1918, so costly in lives?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

For what reasons was the conduct of warfare, 1914-1918, so costly in lives? There are many reasons and factors as to why the Great War was so costly in lives. The first of these was that this was the first imperialised war that the majority of the generals in charge of the armies had encountered. All of the military tactics that the generals had been taught were now seen as being "old fashioned" but generals, such as Field Marshall Haig, were too stubborn to realise this. Men on horseback were used at the start of the war, but they just didn't stand a chance against weapons such as riffles and machine guns. Also all of the plans and advances used, especially at the start of the war, were all offensive. However as the war grew longer it became increasingly obvious that this was not going to get anyone anywhere, and it also resulted in thousands of deaths, with little or no advance for the offensive armies. ...read more.

Middle

This poor hygiene led to diseases and the infestation of things such as lice. As a result of this unfortunate life in the trenches the moral of the troops dropped. Supplies also became a rarity especially along the front line and this didn't help much if the soldiers were supposed to perform to their best when called upon. The element of surprise was not used to its greatest effect, this was also a cause as to why there were many losses of life. For example during one invasion when the British troops went over the top, they set off a mine so that they would get it all on film! But this blatantly gave away the fact that they were about to attack so the Germans anticipated the attack and they had plenty of time to prepare for the onslaught. The use of new technology, such as the tank, wasn't used to its potential. It was used very poorly when it was first invented, the tactics were not thought through enough and after it had been used once it had also lost its element of surprise. ...read more.

Conclusion

However it was just a simple rifle that was being used, not machine guns. There were other weapons used such as artillery, which could cause great destruction. Bits of shrapnel that flew off in all directions would take a soldier by surprise and cause great pain and injury to them. The doctors and surgeons during the Great War would have to act fast and simply amputate many limbs; some soldiers would have died due to loss of blood. In conclusion the main reasons for the great losses in life during World War 1 were mostly due to the poor tactics of arrogant and incompetent generals, the fact that it was not realised sooner that defence was the most effective tactic given what weapons were being used and that it seemed that there was a disregard of human life. Although there are other reasons mentioned in this essay I believe them to have been the main three to blame for the great number of losses between the fighting of 1914-1918. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. 'Lions Led by Donkeys'. How valid is this interpretation of the conduct of British ...

    so he could base his articles using a bigger view of the war. Many people say that the Generals needed to be away from the battlefield. There was no point them being at the front because they would not be able to get a wider picture of what was actually going on.

  2. Why was Trench Warfare so terrible

    In reality the cycle was determined by the necessities of the situation. Even while at rest men might find themselves tasked with duties that placed them in the line of fire. A man might expect in a year to spend some 70 days in the front line, with another 30

  1. Propaganda, Recruitment and Resistance: The Home Front 1914-1918

    Some men did not want to fight because they had a well paid job and good career prospects, whilst others left the rest of the population to volunteer because they thought that the war would not last long. They assumed that if they joined the army they would die, they

  2. How did warfare change between November 1914 and March 1918?

    They were very useful for Germany because they could just shoot down a line of men, as proved in the Somme. However, they were also adapted well by the Canadians, as they used theirs to be fired up in the air, to get a larger range, and then to fall down onto the enemy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work