• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Glengaryy Glen Ross - Act 1, Scene 2

Extracts from this document...


Glengarry Glen Ross Act One, Scene Two The second scene of the tripartite first act of David Mamet's Glengarry Glen Ross appears to start just as suddenly as the first scene ends, taking place in the same setting, the action simply cutting from Levene and Williamson across to Moss and Aaronow. This is typical of American writers of the time, and Mamet does not tell us many physical aspects of the scene, leaving much of the setting as minimal or complex as the reader/actor wishes. The quick change of action leads into the fast pace of the scene itself, in which we see Moss and Aaronow talking about the situation at the real estate office, where they work, that the two men at the bottom of the 'board' are going to get fired. This fast pace is emphasised by the use of the many ellipses in the scene, creating a realistic, harried conversation between the two characters: Moss Polacks and deadbeats Aaronow ...Polacks... Moss Deadbeats all Aaronow ...they hold on to their money... Moss All of 'em. They, hey: it happens to us all Aaronow Where am I going to work? These opening lines to the scene give a clear indication to the personalities of the characters. ...read more.


He does, in fact, want Aaronow to steal the premium leads from the office that night, so that they can sell them in order to keep their jobs. Moss manipulates Aaronow in yet another fast-paced, frenzied conversation, in order to convince him that it is he who must steal the leads, and he alone: Moss Yes. It is, George. (Pause.) Yes. It's a big decision. (Pause.) And it's a big reward. (Pause.) It's a big reward. For one night's work. (Pause.) But it's got to be tonight. [...] Aaronow You have to steal the leads tonight? [...] Aaronow You're, you're saying so you have to go in there tonight and... Moss You... Aaronow I'm sorry? Moss You. Here we see how Moss manipulates Aaronow, beginning by addressing him using his forename, George. Whereas the use of the surname would assert his authority over Aaronow, by using his forename Moss, yet again, creates a false impression of comradeship. He then goes on to use emphatic repetition in order to ensure he has Aaronow's full attention. The words which are repeated are also very important: the repetition of "big" and "reward" continue Moss' persuasion and help to emphasise his apparent feelings about how huge the situation really is. ...read more.


If it was just an idea, if they were not really 'talking' about it, but simply 'speaking', he cannot be linked to crime after it has happened. This conversation continues, as disjointedly as the rest of the scene, until both Aaronow and the audience are just as confused as each other, until we learn Moss' true intentions: he wants Aaronow to commit the crime of robbery, alone, and not turn him in. After ensuring that Aaronow wouldn't turn him in to the authorities, Moss proceeds to reveal that he would not help Aaronow if he was in the same situation, claiming that even if the robbery isn't committed by Aaronow, he is still an accessory. When asked why, he proceeds to claim "because you listened." In this emphatic ending to the scene, we see how Moss has now asserted the fact that he has complete power over Aaronow, and the differences between 'hearing' and 'listening' immediately come to mind, and links are made to the somewhat proleptic conversation beforehand. Whereas if there was a chance that Moss would be affiliated with the crime, they were simply 'speaking'. Now that there is no way Moss can be linked, Aaronow becomes an accessory because he 'listened', perhaps considered as the parallel to 'talking'. After this we must ask ourselves: are we all affiliated to crimes, just by 'hearing', if actually, somebody can claim we were 'listening'? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Play Writes section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Play Writes essays

  1. Evoking the past is one of the most important strategies in the practice of ...

    However this question can be easily answered. Stone was used to play the roles of the white men because he somewhat represented the power the whites had over the blacks, an excellent example would be when he snapped his fingers to get what he wanted, without having to utter a word.

  2. David Hare's criticism of the Legal System in Scene 1 Acts 1 - 4

    Strict stage directions are also used by Hare to communicate meaning to the directors and the actors in the play. Due to Hare being a director himself he knew what he wanted to achieve in the stage directions in

  1. Protagonists in Top Girls (Caryl Churchill)

    Everything she has done or speaks about is in the past (going to America etc.) or takes place in between acts two and three (her promotion). As well as her actions, we can also notice the evolution in Angie's psychological state, an evolution which seems to go backwards due to the unconventional order of the acts.

  2. Long Day's Journey into Night: Can One Successfully Escape Reality?

    The view they take is a hypocritical one in that each of them wants an easy way out and does his best to find it. The Tyrone's tiptoe around certain incontrovertible facts such as these. Each of them makes intimations, but does not say what needs to be said.

  1. How does the theme of invitations begin to develop through A Passage To India(TM) ...

    Quested were accustomed to consider a successful party. They arrived early... but most of the Indian guests had arrived even earlier, and stood massed at the farther side of the tennis lawns doing nothing." In page 37, Mr. Fielding invites Adela, Mrs. Moore and Dr. Aziz to his house for a tea party, where the Indian seeking English Mrs.

  2. Hobson's Choice - With particular reference to Act 1, show how Brighouse presents a ...

    '"Maggie: It isn't". Maggie is very blunt and matter-of-fact when she is talking to her sisters, as she proves again when she says "He got up late", in response to another statement from Alice about their father. Brighouse has chosen subtle, yet effective, methods in broadening the audience's knowledge of

  1. Remind yourself of Act III Scene 1, Consider the dramatic significance of this episode ...

    Lady Teazle made me the happiest of men - and I been the miserablest dog since we committed matrimony'. His conclusion 'She dissipates my fortune and contradicts all my humour' could not provide better foresight for this latest episode between the quarrelling couple.

  2. Scene by scene analysis of "Equus"

    It?s like he did not speak the same language as Dysart. Also, he does the reverse of what other people want from him, for example he doesn?t sing the song which Dysart wants him to sing but the first one for the third time.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work