Hamlet - It's hard to define what revenge actually is.

Authors Avatar

English coursework 2002

Hamlet Essay

It’s hard to define what revenge actually is. I suppose Francis Bacon put it best in his essay about revenge, ‘Revenge is a kind of wild justice; which the more man’s nature runs to, the more ought law to weed it out’. In a ‘Revenge Play’, normally, the whole play is based on the revenge and it is combined with tragedy. In this case, they are combined to cause a big problem for Hamlet. In this essay, I will examine this problem.

   There are very different characters in Hamlet; they all seem to have their own problems. Hamlet’s problem is the main focus of the play but we are also made aware of the other characters problems. At the end of the play, we see the finale in which all the characters come together to end the lives of others. They think that it will solve their problems. So, therefore I think that the characters are the main problem in this play.

   I think that Hamlet’s character is unsuited to this play. He is not a ‘revenger’. We can tell this in Act 1, Scene 5 when the ghost tells Hamlet to take his revenge on Claudius. He questions whether he should ‘what else? And shall I couple hell?’ if he was a revenger then he would rush to Claudius and kill him straight away.

   We can also see this in what Hamlet does. He tries to scare the king by acting out ‘The murder of Gonzago’ in a similar way to how Claudius killed Hamlets father. He does this so he can be sure that the ghost was telling the truth. In Act 2, Scene 2, he decides to perform this play and ‘catch the conscience of the King’. When this play is performed in Act 3, Scene 2, Claudius realises that Hamlet knows that he is a murderer. He leaves shouting ‘give me some light, away’. I think that this tells us that Hamlet is clever because he subtly told Claudius that he knew about the murder of his father without anyone else knowing.

   Another example of this is in Act 3, Scene 3. Claudius is kneeling and praying to God. Hamlet comes up behind him and draws his sword. He thinks that he will do it ‘now might I do it pat, now ‘a is a praying’. And now I’ll do it’ but his nerve fails him. He realises that it will not really revenge his father ‘why this is hire and salary, not revenge’ and swears to do it ‘when he is drunk, asleep or in a rage’. I think that even though Hamlet had a reason not to kill Claudius at that moment, he shouldn’t have done because that is not Hamlet’s character. If Hamlet was a revenger, then a lot of the play wouldn’t have happened.

   In Act 3, Scene 4, Hamlet briefly turns into a ‘revenger’ when he ‘thrusts his rapier through the arras’ and kills Polonius, thinking it was the king. He seems completely controversial to his character, but when he is talking to Gertrude, he compares the king to the devil which shows us that Hamlet despises Claudius and what he has done.

   In my opinion, there must be a reason as to why Hamlet keeps putting of killing Claudius. He likes to think things through (this is ironic because the way that Hamlet kills Claudius doesn’t really prove to be the result of much thought) but this still shouldn’t take him so long to finally do it.

Join now!

   This, therefore opens the question – Does Hamlet really want to kill Claudius? Everything I have just written questions this. We do have the suspicion that the ghost isn’t trust worthy as we have no real proof that the ghost is genuine, but if Hamlet disliked Claudius anyway (as he married his mother so close to the death of his father) then he should have killed Claudius when he had the chance.

   This brings me onto my next character analysis, Claudius. Claudius is the reason that the whole main problem started in the first place. He is a ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

Avatar

3 STARS *** This is a good essay which shows understanding and knowledge of the play. More social and historical context is needed when discussing female characters. The writer shows an understanding of dramatic techniques Shakespeare used and how the audience would respond to them. At times the essay was in danger of merely summarising the intricacies of the plot and not focusing on answering the question.