• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

History Coursework - World War One Sources Question

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework - World War One Sources Question 1) Sources A, B and C are war recruitment posters published by various governments with the aim of influencing more people to volunteer for armed service in the war. Sources A and B are an earlier type of source, depending on the patriotic fervour that swept Britain at the war's outset, portraying enlistment as a duty to the country and empire. The posters themselves being of an accusatory nature, demanding from the reader "What did you do in the war?" and that they should "Go!", the fighting taking a crusade-like facade in which the only way to please parents, friends and girls was to join up and head towards the fighting. That this was accepted by many, was partly because the war was seen as an adventure, and perhaps because the last war where there was mass recruitment was almost one hundred years previous, the majority of those fighting in the interlude being well-trained career soldiers. Source C, however, is a much later source, as can be determined from the approach it uses to "persuade" people to enlist, preventing the "mad brute (of) militarism", in this case, a raving gorilla, that represents Germany, from reaching out from Europe (bottom-centre, right) which has been decimated, to the shores of "America" (bottom, centre). The poster compels the reader to joint up for the US army, probably after the USA declared war on Germany, on the 7th April 1917, proving this to be a later source, produced after the war has raged unabated for three years, thus having dispelled the notion of adventure or even perhaps duty. 2) The three posters are very different in the fashion their aims are laid out, nevertheless, there are some similarities between them. The earlier sources provoke Victorian attitudes towards duty, leading to the enrolling of over two million volunteer troops into the British armed services from 1914 - 1916, while source C plays on the moral decency of the reader, calling for a halt to the foul deeds committed by the ape (representing Germany) ...read more.


The heroism of the East Surries is conveyed by their poses, arms positioned across the face, all wounds having been taken by presenting ones' front to the opposition, backed up by source, G proclaiming that every man from the East Surrey regiment were "gallant", who therefore could not be hit in the back, thus deserving of their "corner of a foreign field" (Brookes' The Soldier). To suggest that that either report is even wildly optimistic, would be a massive understatement, source G reporting that "the Surries' dribbled the four footballs for a mile and a quarter into the enemy trenches", the net gain by the end of November (attack started July 1) was 5 miles deep at the greatest point, and 18 miles wide. Advance on July 1st however was just "a mile deep and three and a half miles wide" (official Dispatch to Haig). Source H contrasts with the other strongly patriotic, pro-war pieces, it ironically giving some humour, in a sick sense, clashing source G's "the game" (i.e. team sports e.g. rugby) with the actual feelings of the soldier towards playing as a team "My plan was to walk alone... not get bunched up with the others" and when the advance had taken place, the position taken, though in insufficient strength to hold it, the 'gallant' soldier "ran for it." Indeed, this merely proves what one can already guess; these are real people not 'heroes' while he also tongue-lashes the political commentaries produced at the time (sources F and G) exclaiming that the actual attack on July 1st was made by "overladen porters" this being borne out by the massive equipment lists that the soldier carried as well as his rifle and ammunition. B.A. Steward also talks how these 'gallant heroes' had "turned and shot... two frightened and unarmed Germans." It is very clear that this piece is later, which indeed it is, as such candid speech at the time, many families having lost relations, would have been frowned on. ...read more.


Due to the nature of the conflict, many of those who took part would have painful memories and would thus probably not relish the prospect of speaking about a truly terrible time in their lives: that the memories are still painful today show the depth of anguish felt by the majority, shown most poignantly by Owen and Sassoon in some of their poetry which we cannot even begin to comprehend. A historian writing at the time may well not be so critical of the government, as they had, after all, won the war, after four years slogging through mud to their necks. They may well have swallowed the lies and deceptions written by the government to cover the reality and truth, and would probably be quite proud of the fact that they had, after all, won. The writer at the time would also come up against sources like I which, not published b y the government, towed the official line. Although I doubt they would be fooled by I, which is obviously too good to be true, or whether they would recognise it for what it undoubtedly is, I don't know, though I would like to believe that they would. They may however not realise that sources H and J were true, or that the trenches were as bad as they have suggested. The truth about the war was, of course finally realised, if only for the reason that it was a political weapon and was used as such by the labour party to considerable effect. Basically, I believe the pieces would be different because we have had time to pause, take stock and question the truth of the matter. Materials Used Sources A-J "Britain and the First World War" Britain and the Great War - G. Hetherton World War facts and figures - P. Haythornthwaite 1914 - 1918 In Poetry - anthology by E.L. Black History Channel.com They Called it Passchendaele - Lyn MacDonald The Great War Generals on the Western Front - R. Neillands (facts + figures about Somme, Yepres etc.) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. In the wars, Robert Rose is a very significant character.

    Otherwise the novel would be much too depressing to read. The author switches from a war scene to a lighter subject in order to grasp the reader's attention and keep the novel interesting. It is not a story of orderly sequenced events but a story of action.

  2. Explain the contemporary popularity of Rupert Brooke's sonnets.

    The first line of the poem is "If I should die, think only this of me..." The soldier hopefully yet naively assumes he may not die and rather than have his death considered a loss, he wants it to be seen as a victory as it has been for his country.

  1. How is the character Carlo portrayed by Louis de Bernières in Captain Corelli's Mandolin?

    " 'Don't give us a cold,' said Carlo. Weber's face trembled with suppressed tears and desperation, and at last he said suddenly, 'Forgive me.' Carlo sneered, 'You will never be forgiven' " These final words of Carlo's are not much, but they convey everything with the intensity de Berniļæ½res portrays of his character: his disdain of weakness and a strange sense of sadness for his friends.

  2. The Poems of World War One Can Be Broadly Divided into Three Waves of ...

    This poem has a semantic field of religion; the poet has almost compared the church to the dreadful warfare using words like "bells," "orisons," "mourning," "choirs," "candles" and "holy." Owen uses the word "stuttering" to describe the rifles; this is an affective use of personification.

  1. Conscientious Objection Sources Questions

    Source D is very reliable as it is written by a historian, and it would also be very useful for he would have taken a lot of different views into account. However, it doesn't show any evidence of how people reacted to conscientious objectors and is therefore of no use.

  2. The Battle of the Somme 1916 - source related study.

    us an idea as to the anger he is feeling towards his superiors. He also mentions 'Goldy', which makes me ask who was Goldy? After researching Raws, I found that he had a brother called Robert Goldthorpe Raws, suggesting that Goldy was his brother.

  1. World war one short story coursework.

    I sealed the floorboard cautiously and clambered into bed. I embedded my self into my covers, a think layer of duvets. I had always dreamed of going to war. Fighting honourably for my country. I can imagine the thrill and excitement.

  2. WW1 - How successful was propeganda in the encouraging enlistment and ensuring public sport?

    The army gave them a paid job at last and they probably would not need much persuading to join up. The men and boys who joined up did so 'in a spirit of devotion and self-sacrifice'. The First Hundred Thousand were later called The Lost Generation because so few of them survived the war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work