• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

History is a kind of story-telling. Compare and contrast the ways in which Friel and Williams present characters who offer their own histories and concept of truth in Making History and A Streetcar Named Desire.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

?History is a kind of story-telling.? Compare and contrast the ways in which Friel and Williams present characters who offer their own histories and concept of truth in Making History and A Streetcar Named Desire. Your response should consider interpretations and should include reflections on the dramatic and theatrical aspects of the texts. Both ?Making History? and ?A Streetcar Named Desire? witness the characters showing the audience different perceptions of their pasts by presenting both the truth and their histories differently to the actuality. At the time of ?Making History?s? writing (1987-8), the political situation in Northern Ireland was as deadlocked as in the post 1968 Troubles. The way Friel writes about O?Neill in Making History was affected by what was happening in the 1980s. In the late 1500s O?Neill was attempting to make Ireland independent, and in the 1980s Northern Ireland was still ruled by Britain. Friel shows the truth of O?Neill?s past to possibly rationalise why Ireland was still not completely independent. Unlike ?Making History?, which was still affected by the same problems of the late 1500s many years on, ?A Streetcar Named Desire? was written much closer to the time it was set. Written in 1947, the play dramatizes the conflict between fading Southern belle Blanche and Polish immigrant Stanley, who is determined to capture and consolidate his version of the American Dream. ...read more.

Middle

However, without the light as an audience we know that she can have no clear view of herself and reality. Blanche sings a whimsical song whose refrain, ?but it wouldn?t be make believe, if you believed in me? points to a more subjective truth which is more forgiving of human failings, which reflects Blanche?s delusion. Blanche suggests that she ?took the blows in my face and my body?, reflecting how Blanche?s attitude towards the truth is shaped by her own experiences, which form the reasoning behind her change of truth. Despite both plays presenting histories differently to how they actually are, they both do this in different ways and their structure forms and important part of this. ?A Streetcar Named Desire? sees a decisive event happen before the play begins ? the reason why it seemed that Blanche ?let the place [Belle-Reve] go?. The play develops with Blanche reliving these events which have to be re-presented to the audience. In contrast, in ?Making History? the play takes place before and after the Battle of Kinsale. Discussions deriving from dialogue between characters and stage directions reveal information and inform the audience. ?Making History? is composed of two acts, with Act I offering the successful portrayal of O?Neill as exercised by Lombard, in contrast to Act II which takes place post rebellion failure whereby O?Neill descends to his death in exile. ...read more.

Conclusion

Blanche claims ?I ran for protection?, suggesting she had no choice in her past actions. She states ?I have always depended on the kindness of strangers?, but in reality her downfall in life is because she has not been kind enough to herself. She cries that ?It was because?I?d suddenly said ? ?I know!??. This shows how she feels to blame for the death of her homosexual Husband. This is also ironic because the only people who have been kind to Blanche are those who used her for prostitution; others have had a lack of sympathy. For example, Stanley states ?Sister Blanche is no Lily?, with irony that hints at Blanche?s corruption. A ?lily? is white which has connotations of purity and serenity, and on a metaphorical level ?Sister? refers to nuns ? the irony being that they have to take an oath of celibacy, of which it is clear to the audience that Blanche has not done. To conclude, both plays have an element of distorting facts in order to present the characters? histories differently. However, Blanche lives an illusion out of desperation, whereas Lombard changes the truth in an attempt to reinforce the Gaelic Irish?s sense of identity in the face of English oppression. A difference between the two plays is that Blanche has control over her own history to a certain degree, whereas O?Neill has a total lack of control over his as shown by his character at the end. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Criticism & Comparison section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Criticism & Comparison essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The English Patient

    5 star(s)

    June 26th, 2001. Date accessed: July 9th, 2008. <http://inkpot.com/books/english.html> * O'Dea, Gregory. "Nationality and Textuality in Michael Ondaatje's The English Patient." May 9th, 2006. Date accessed: July 9th, 2008. <http://www.acponline.org/about_acp/chapters/tn/english.pdf> * Ondaatje, Michael (1992). The English Patient. Bloomsbury (1994). Bloomsbury Publishing Plc: London. * Orlowski, Victoria. "Metafiction" (1996).

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Within the three texts, Brideshead Revisited by Evelyn Waugh, Look back in Anger by ...

    4 star(s)

    Many of his poems in The Whitsun Weddings portray the English countryside of ?piled gold clouds? and ?shining gull marked mud?[18] juxtaposed by ?industrial shadows? and ?dark towns? that ?heap on the horizon?[19]. This is best seen in ?Sunny Prestatyn? and especially ?Large Cool Store? where he first describes the

  1. How do Arthur Miller and Tenessee Williams explore the blurring of reality and fantasy ...

    It is also based over a longer period of time; months in fact. Williams seemed to base his play around the working-class within society and highlights the problems within this group of class; through Blanche Dubois and Stanley Kowalski as oppositions, exploring and defining the severity of the differences when

  2. Translations and Things Fall Apart, examine how Friel and Achebe present the issue of ...

    This is an overarching idea that reaches its crescendo with the Donnelly twins, Friel's representation of the Provision IRA within the play i.e. the violent end of Yolland, inferred by the actions of the Donnelly twins, is an echo of 1980s era conflicts.

  1. Compare the ways in which Larkin and Duffy present the reality of love.

    In particular, Duffy portrays the death of the couple?s relationship through the personification of common household items, as can be seen in ?the small deaths of light bulbs pining all day in my ears, their echoes audible tears?. With the ?small deaths of light bulbs? echoing the disintegration of hope

  2. Control, submission and rebellion in the novels The Handmaids Tale by Margaret Atwood, Memoirs ...

    is something only wealthy men could afford. Usually the money earned from the bidding of a geisha?s virginity goes to the okiya as a payback for training the woman to be a geisha. In one incident, Sayuri is being accused of giving up her virginity to the Mameha?s Baron but in reality, he tried to sexually abuse Sayuri.

  1. How do the writers present sexuality and gender in Tales Of Ovid, Streetcar Named ...

    Du Bois line and a sort of victory for the new Kowalski family. As the Cambridge Companion To Tennessee Williams states ?Theatregoers? did not easily shake off lingering apprehensions that were born of the 1930?s depression and nurtured by the 1945 unleashing of nuclear weapons? in this climate, the loose

  2. Compare and contrast American playwrights presentation of masculinity in Death of a Salesman, Whos ...

    In the final act named after a violent religious ritual ?The Exorcism?, George proves himself to be masculine by ultimately winning the game by ?killing? his and Martha?s son. George states his is ?not a god?, I don?t have power over life and death do I?? this is contradicted by

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work