• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did poets in the early stages of World War 1 seek to glorify war and present war as worthwhile?

Extracts from this document...


Amanda McCarthy How did poets in the early stages of World War 1 seek to glorify war and present war as worthwhile? 'Who's for the game', 'The Soldier', 'In Flanders Field' and 'Rendezvous' are four poems that I feel are apt examples of typical poetry written in World War 1. Poetry throughout this period of time, share similar qualities of which I hope to explore further, one of these qualities is the recurring theme of the glorification of war. The themes of early war poetry tend to same themes that reoccur in most poems. These themes are glory, honour, duty, patriotism and a united front against adversary. All four poems seem initially different, in tone, language, and writing techniques, but all glorify war. I intend to explore how the different writing techniques used in the poems portray the same message, and how their poem glorifies war in its own way. World War 1 was the first major war to affect Britain's people and the urgency of recruitment for the war created influence for many poets who were opinionated about the war; the result was extreme propaganda poetry. Many of these poets later changed their approach to writing due to the tragedies of war, and although the poems are more reflective and respectful, they still promote war as a worthy cause for the understood tragedies. The war also created many poets, soldiers who use poetry as an outlet for their thoughts these poems were usually brutally honest, reflective very emotive. ...read more.


and is a very unrealistic and misleading point of view on war. 'In Flanders Field' is more of an introspective than propaganda poem respectfully attributing those who have died. Yet, it establishes the conflict and hatred towards Germany; 'Take up the quarrel with the foe' asking people to fight for those who died. This places guilt on the reader and creates more seriousness. It also has a relaxed atmosphere of the dead speaking as if death was a worthy sacrifice, a theme that runs through most early war poetry whether the poems are propaganda, respectful or pensive. The use of language and the form and structure differs from poem to poem but contributes to the overall effect and tone of a poem. 'In Flanders Field' the form of the poem has a constant rhythm and rhyme. Each line has eight syllables apart from the twice repeated line 'In Flanders Field' which has four; this makes this line stand out in contrast to the rhythm of the rest of the poem as this is an important line. There is fluctuating rhyme pattern the main rhyming sounds in this poem are 'O and 'I. This makes the poem flow more and creating a familiarity within the text and establishes links between lines. 'The Soldier' a patriotic thus persuasive pro war poem is also emotive and a tribute to the soldiers. ...read more.


valid to the reader; so the reader responds and is influenced by them. After reading all four poems I have a general idea of the style and motivations of typical early poetry I have come to the conclusion that it is not just the poems itself but the way the writer use writing methods to manipulate the reader into thinking the same way. It is therefore the interpretation that these methods insight that causes the response it does; influencing men to recruit. All four poems were similar in theme, and the motivation to inspire people to enlist by glorifying war or applying a sense of obligation and pressure on their target audience, young men. It is in my opinion that the more abrupt style of poem like 'Who's for the Game?' would have been more influential on the reader at that time as it question the man as a person and is so aggressive it would of been hard to dismiss at the time under the circumstances. In retrospect, it would not be as influential now as people are not as patriotic. Poems with a more emotive tone as 'In Flanders Field' and 'The Soldier' contained propaganda promoting war but as it wasn't very prominent so may of influenced many without them feeling as manipulated as they would with the more extreme poems. The emotion in 'Rendezvous', 'The Soldier' and 'In Flanders Field' made me inclined to feel the emotion also. The glorification of war was revealed by the poem by the overall language, tone, form and structure of the poem. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The causes of world war one

    4 star(s)

    Artillery In the trenches one of the most terrifying scenarios possible for us to imagine was: You and a number of other men playing cards in your dug-out, to the sound of the incessant, unceasing explosion of enemy shells. Steadily they start creeping closer and closer, with you and you

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how the poets of Happy is England Now in the anthology Up the ...

    4 star(s)

    As a result, these poems are more detached and with comparably less feeling behind them, which can be seen when analysing these poems in detail. Firstly, the poems "Happy..." and "England..." have many things in common which shows how they are used to present the war.

  1. The Poems of World War One Can Be Broadly Divided into Three Waves of ...

    dying in war is so pointless and futile are put across quite vividly. Sorley used no sarcasm in this poem; the mood is very somber throughout. Another experience poem, written by Wilfred Owen is "Exposure." It is about soldiers stuck in no mans land and their continuos suffering.

  2. Compare and contrast three poems on the theme of war. In your essay you ...

    The fact that it asks 'what bells', shows that Owen is trying to insinuate that nobody cares about the young men dying for their country. The first line is already a great contrast to what the title suggests. The next two lines of the poem are started off with the same two words 'only the'.

  1. History - World War One

    To maintain a high standard of fitness, all members of the WAAC had to do physical exercises every day. This included hockey and dancing. Women in the WAAC were not given full military status. The women enrolled rather than enlisted and were punished for breaches of discipline by civil rather than military courts.

  2. Discuss the first world war as reflected in the poem of the time

    Jessie Pope repeats the word Who? Because she is questioning us and in the final two lines of the poem she tells us who this who is and its You. She uses the word you to emphasise who she is talking to. In these two lines the emphasis is on as war being every mans duty.

  1. How does Owen stress the true horror of the First World War, and how ...

    As the poem ends Owen gives one final indication of this man's pain: "How cold and late it is! Why don't they come And put him into bed? Why don't they come?" The repetition here of the question "Why don't they come" augments his sense of pain and suffering whilst indicating his longing for an end to his nightmarish existence.


    There shall be In that rich earth a richer dust concealed; A dust whom England bore, shaped, made aware, Gave, once, her flowers to love, her ways to roam, A body of England's, breathing English air, Washed by the rivers, blest by suns of home.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work