• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did poets in the early stages of World War 1 seek to glorify war and present war as worthwhile?

Extracts from this document...


Amanda McCarthy How did poets in the early stages of World War 1 seek to glorify war and present war as worthwhile? 'Who's for the game', 'The Soldier', 'In Flanders Field' and 'Rendezvous' are four poems that I feel are apt examples of typical poetry written in World War 1. Poetry throughout this period of time, share similar qualities of which I hope to explore further, one of these qualities is the recurring theme of the glorification of war. The themes of early war poetry tend to same themes that reoccur in most poems. These themes are glory, honour, duty, patriotism and a united front against adversary. All four poems seem initially different, in tone, language, and writing techniques, but all glorify war. I intend to explore how the different writing techniques used in the poems portray the same message, and how their poem glorifies war in its own way. World War 1 was the first major war to affect Britain's people and the urgency of recruitment for the war created influence for many poets who were opinionated about the war; the result was extreme propaganda poetry. Many of these poets later changed their approach to writing due to the tragedies of war, and although the poems are more reflective and respectful, they still promote war as a worthy cause for the understood tragedies. The war also created many poets, soldiers who use poetry as an outlet for their thoughts these poems were usually brutally honest, reflective very emotive. ...read more.


and is a very unrealistic and misleading point of view on war. 'In Flanders Field' is more of an introspective than propaganda poem respectfully attributing those who have died. Yet, it establishes the conflict and hatred towards Germany; 'Take up the quarrel with the foe' asking people to fight for those who died. This places guilt on the reader and creates more seriousness. It also has a relaxed atmosphere of the dead speaking as if death was a worthy sacrifice, a theme that runs through most early war poetry whether the poems are propaganda, respectful or pensive. The use of language and the form and structure differs from poem to poem but contributes to the overall effect and tone of a poem. 'In Flanders Field' the form of the poem has a constant rhythm and rhyme. Each line has eight syllables apart from the twice repeated line 'In Flanders Field' which has four; this makes this line stand out in contrast to the rhythm of the rest of the poem as this is an important line. There is fluctuating rhyme pattern the main rhyming sounds in this poem are 'O and 'I. This makes the poem flow more and creating a familiarity within the text and establishes links between lines. 'The Soldier' a patriotic thus persuasive pro war poem is also emotive and a tribute to the soldiers. ...read more.


valid to the reader; so the reader responds and is influenced by them. After reading all four poems I have a general idea of the style and motivations of typical early poetry I have come to the conclusion that it is not just the poems itself but the way the writer use writing methods to manipulate the reader into thinking the same way. It is therefore the interpretation that these methods insight that causes the response it does; influencing men to recruit. All four poems were similar in theme, and the motivation to inspire people to enlist by glorifying war or applying a sense of obligation and pressure on their target audience, young men. It is in my opinion that the more abrupt style of poem like 'Who's for the Game?' would have been more influential on the reader at that time as it question the man as a person and is so aggressive it would of been hard to dismiss at the time under the circumstances. In retrospect, it would not be as influential now as people are not as patriotic. Poems with a more emotive tone as 'In Flanders Field' and 'The Soldier' contained propaganda promoting war but as it wasn't very prominent so may of influenced many without them feeling as manipulated as they would with the more extreme poems. The emotion in 'Rendezvous', 'The Soldier' and 'In Flanders Field' made me inclined to feel the emotion also. The glorification of war was revealed by the poem by the overall language, tone, form and structure of the poem. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The causes of world war one

    4 star(s)

    Lenin had no interest in prolonging the war for Russia, so he opened peace talks with Germany in the bleak polish town of Brest Litovsk. German forces were within 100 miles of Petrograd when, on 3rd march, Russian delegates signed a peace treaty with Germany.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how the poets of Happy is England Now in the anthology Up the ...

    4 star(s)

    The immediate noticeable thing is that England is personified in both poems. By doing this, the poets can make it seems as though soldiers going to war is something which is approved by England itself. As a result, this can be seen as a very pro-war stance, as the poets are encouraging people to go to war.

  1. The Poems of World War One Can Be Broadly Divided into Three Waves of ...

    His attitude to war was a very flippant one. He wrote explicitly about pride and glory with scant regard for the true meaning of conflict. As the war progressed, idealistic youths were harshened by their experiences and became angry and cynical.

  2. War poetry - different poets attitudes to war.

    'In Flanders Fields' doesn't give as much detail as 'Dulce et Decorum est'. This poem doesn't give a lot of detail about the war. This poem is telling the target audience that the soldiers who had died, just a few days before were just ordinary people living and feeling ordinary things.

  1. World War 1 Poetry.

    I will be looking at and considering the effectiveness of two patriotic poems. Firstly, 'Who's for the game?' written by Jessie Pope and secondly, 'Into battle' which was put together by Julian Grenfell. Although they are on the same subject, war, with the same aim, to show war in all it's glory, they approach their subject in extremely contrasting ways.


    And think, this heart, all evil shed away, A pulse in the eternal mind, no less Gives somewhere back the thoughts by England given; Her sights and sounds; dreams happy as her day; And laughter, learnt of friends; and gentleness, In hearts at peace, under an English heaven.

  1. Compare 2 war poems demonstrating an awareness of the poets' attitudes towards war.

    I think Owen has used this approach in the third stanza to make it stand out. It is short and to the point and the briefness of the verse makes it dramatic. Owen used enjambment in "Dulce et Decorum Est" e.g.

  2. Compare three war poems demonstrating awareness of the poet's attitude towards war.

    However, once he has developed his pictures ' one hundred agonises in black-and-white' he hands them over to his boss 'who will pick out five or six for Sunday's supplement'. The photographer's view of the British people is not a positive one.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work