How do the two main characters in your comparison novels compare? (The Great Gatsby and The Secret History)

Authors Avatar

How do the two main characters in your comparison novels compare? (The Great Gatsby and The Secret History)

In ‘The Great Gatsby’, by F. Scott Fitzgerald, many compelling issues are conveyed through the attributes and actions of the wide range of primary and secondary characters – however the most notable, as suggested by the book’s title, is arguably Jay Gatsby himself. He appears to be the epitome of enigma and strongly reflects the novel’s hedonistic social influences. Similarly, Donna Tartt illustrates similar profound issues using a similar technique with the portrayal of her characters in ‘The Secret History’, of which Henry Winter is a main focus of the storyline, much like Gatsby.

Firstly, one main aspect of both Henry and Gatsby appears to be their mysterious and unusual natures. A distinct gap between Gatsby and his peers is evident within the first party of the novel, as Jordan Baker states ‘He told me once he was an Oxford man… …However, I don’t believe it.’ This suggests how mistrusting even Gatsby’s neighbours feel towards him, which is ironic taking into account that he has invited her into his own home. Gatsby has only told her ‘once’, which in itself reinforces his unrevealing nature, as he does not care to make repeated attempts at convincing others of his secrets. A similar scenario is created in The Secret History, as Bunny tells Richard ‘He can read hieroglyphics.’ However, a different atmosphere is created by this portrayal of hearsay; a true sense of admiration is reinforced by the emphasis on ‘hieroglyphics’, which contrasts directly with Jordan’s lack of belief in Gatsby. The social setting of both characters appears to be a significant factor – Gatsby revels in the fact that he associates with ‘celebrated people’, but does not describe them as friends or even acquaintances. This can be juxtaposed with the tight-knit friendship of the five pupils at Hampden, which Richard describes as an ‘arresting party’ on first encounter. Although both characters share the same enigmatic quality and our narrators must initially learn about them through word of mouth, Henry seems at first to be much more reputable than Gatsby through his peers’ faith in his abilities.

Join now!

Contrary to this, however, Gatsby’s superficial portrayal is usually much more positive than Henry’s, especially on first encounter. ‘It was one of those smiles with a quality of eternal reassurance in it,’ begins to describe his inviting and accommodating attitude, or so it seems. We are drawn so far into and entranced by this enigmatic character, it is hard to question or accuse him of being any different than perfect. The impression given by Henry is quite different, as he is ‘large, square-jawed, with coarse pale skin’. This imagery is highly unattractive in comparison with the implied handsomeness of ...

This is a preview of the whole essay