• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How does Frayn present young Stephen in the first three chapters of "Spies"? How do we respond to him?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How does Frayn present young Stephen in the first three chapters of "Spies"? How do we respond to him? In the opening chapters of "Spies", I believe that Frayn wished to present the young Stephen so that he would, as a character, evoke various different feelings and opinions from his readers. As a result, there appear to be a range of different emotions that a reader could have towards Stephen; from pitying him to finding him somewhat annoying, endearing or a mixture of several all at once. Personally, I am led to finding Stephen quite annoying in the opening chapters - I feel Frayn has tried to ensure that we feel at least frustrated with him in the early part of the book. I believe that how a reader was to respond to Stephen as a character would depend largely on their own personality, as I feel that how he is viewed is very dependant on the response to individual traits. Frayn appears to use many different techniques in order to ensure that he is able to manipulate the reader's feelings towards Stephen, a main one of these being the use of the character of Keith throughout the book. There are many aspects involving Keith that Frayn uses to present Stephen to the reader - how Stephen is towards Keith, what he thinks of him, the dialogue between them, as well as the overall comparison between the two. ...read more.

Middle

We are told that he has "a too-short" grey shirt and "too long" grey shorts, that he wears "grubby" tennis shoes, one of his socks has slipped down, and his laces are undone, immediately presenting him as a rather pitiful sight. Throughout this passage in the book, Frayn slips in words that are perhaps supposed to represent Stephen overall - words such as "inadequate", "plain", "hopeless", and "failed". Whilst one of these words might perhaps have served well in the description, using several of them in a short space subconsciously gives the reader an impression of perhaps how they should be viewing Stephen, or perhaps how everyone else views him. As if this was not effective enough alone, Frayn then presents the reader with a standard by which to compare him; a description of Keith. Frayn cleverly uses the same aspects of Keith's appearance to describe as he did Stephen's, showing the reader that it is an intentional comparison that we should take notice of. Here, we are told that Keith is wearing the same clothes, and that there is where the similarities end. Frayn proceeds to tell us that Keith is smartly and correctly dressed, with his grey socks "neatly pulled up" and his sandals "neatly buckled". Using physical description as a comparison between the boys is an effective technique because it means the reader is able to visually compare them and means that the comparison can be all the more vivid. ...read more.

Conclusion

For example, when talking about the possibility of Mrs Elmsley being a German spy, he says "It had never occurred to me why she had a moustache and a wart in the middle of her forehead". This cartoon-like view that all villains and bad people must be ugly, and that a wart automatically makes you a bad person, is very stereotypical and reminds us that Stephen is still a child. It also makes him seem very comical as we are able to laugh at him for these sorts of statements, which present him as a much more favourable person and character, which I believe is what Frayn wished to achieve by having the narration written in this way. Overall, I believe the techniques that Frayn use to present Stephen to the reader are effective in creating a strong opinion of him from the opening chapter, and are especially effective in creating a character that could be seen differently by every individual reader, enabling them to have a strong person opinion. I do not believe that there would be one shared opinion because the character traits that Frayn shows Stephen to have would cause different responses from different personalities, because almost every aspect of his character I have included in this essay could be responded to in a number of different ways. I believe that Frayn wishes our opinion of Stephen to change throughout the book, and that these chapters are important for creating the initial opinion of him. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Authors section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Authors essays

  1. Examine the presentation of the relationship between Keith and Stephen in Spies

    To understand the nature of their relationship it is important to understand the social contrasts between them. Keith's family is seen as the paragon of what every family should be. In contrast Stephen's family is decidedly "unsatisfactory". A similar situation exists in L.P Hartley's The Go-Between where Marcus's family is

  2. How Effectively Does Frayn Use Barbara Berrill in 'Spies'?

    too tainted by it, for example "I can feel the bobbliness of the leather and the shininess of the popper against my skin, and the wetness on the edge of the flap where she was catching it against the edge of her lip."

  1. Describe How Frayn Presents Women In Spies

    and Mrs Hayward repeatedly being brutalised by her husband. This representation of conflictions parallels with many others littered throughout the novel such as courage and cowardliness, adulthood and childhood and so on. As the novel progresses we see the main theme of espionage and intrigue become interlaced with the

  2. Spies by Michael Frayn. How does Frayn show Stephen's mental progression from childhood ...

    Moreover, the concept of the "x" that appears monthly in Mrs. Hayward's diary is skilfully employed by Frayn by appealing to the reader, who may assume that it refers to her period, and this humour directed at Stephen's perception places the reader on higher ground, communicating Stephen's twisted perception.

  1. Analyse the ways in which Frayn presents the relationship between Stephen and Keith in ...

    This is especially shown when Stephen converses with his father about the "Juice" moving into Trewinnick. We are told "it's true ... Keith said". He later goes on to reminisce on his relationship with Keith, where he says "thank you for having me.

  2. Critical analysis of the opening chapters of Waterland.

    (Possibly meaning being led by fate, as the fates of people were said to lie in the stars). We do not even learn what Tom's relationship with Dick is in the opening four chapters, such is the vagueness of Swift's style.

  1. Discuss the relationship between Keith and Stephen that is presented in the first Six ...

    Looking back, he believes that his plain name 'Stephen Wheatley' or just 'Stephen' didn't suit the boy he used to be, it was too normal as him and his family was apparently not quite right. His elder brother was 'insufferable' and it made him so frustrated that he would 'shout

  2. With detailed reference to at least 3 symbols explore how Frayn employs symbolism in ...

    novel as it is Keith realising his childish mistake of accusing his mother of being a German spy is completely unfounded. Stephen however takes longer to come to this realisation but it is once again the privet that symbolises this 'but something has changed about the perfume of the air

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work