• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How does Pinter exploit the verbal and the visual in the Birthday Party

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Birthday Party is a play in which the visual and the verbal are carefully put together to create certain effects in the spectators. Pinter exploits both the verbal and the visual to show the personalities of the characters as well as their relationships, often with much ambiguity as the visual and verbal do not always match. Indeed, the contrast between the visual and the verbal can at times be very disconcerting for the spectators, creating an atmosphere of uncertainty and secrecy. Pinter also explores power, both verbal and visual, and how it is used to create fear and violence as well as the idea of secrecy. Obviously, the verbal and visual are very important for the characterisation, it is through what characters say and do that we are able to know more about them and the other characters. Petey is the first character that we see on stage, he is also probably the character that we doubt the least; for example, when he says that it is his chess night we are inclined to believe him. He is perhaps the only character, aside from Stanley, who is not taken in by Goldberg and McCann, which we see through his questioning their actions; "Where are you taking him?" He also is not seduced by Goldberg's speeches the way Meg and Lulu are, all he says after Goldberg talks about his childhood is "Well, we all remember our childhood". Petey's blunt manner here shows that he is not really interested by the two newcomers, perhaps why he does not stay for the party. Petey is also quite blunt with his wife, Meg; he answers her questions but does not really elaborate what he is saying or take any interest in her, often just answering "yes" or "no". The spectators get the impression that he would much rather be left alone, in fact the only things he seems to show any real interest in are the paper and his chess night, thus making it seem that he prefers the "outside" world to the community in the boarding house. ...read more.

Middle

the audience could think that this is because he is afraid as if he didn't recognise the name he would've perhaps said so when Meg asked him. He also asks McCann questions about him, although he does not say Goldberg's name but simply refers to him as "he". Goldberg however says that he "hasn't had the pleasure" when Meg asks him if he's met Stanley, this fits with McCann's refusing to acknowledge that Stanley may have known him before: the two characters try to hide any links they may have with Stanley. Stanley also tries to make Goldberg leave, again showing his fear of him, either because he is from some kind of organisation that Stanley has run away from or because Stanley is simply afraid of "outsiders". Thus, Stanley shows his fear through what he says, despite never stating that he is actually afraid. Stanley's relationships with Goldberg and McCann revolve around secrecy and power. Indeed, the characters of McCann and Goldberg themselves seem to be defined by their power as well as their origins, which are shown verbally and visually McCann is a typical Irish name, and the two Christian names he is called by in the play, Dermot and Seamus, are also typically Irish. As well as this we could imagine that the character speaks with an Irish accent. There are also certain humorous things to do with McCann's "irishness". Firstly, when Stanley asks him where he is from he replies "Where do you think?", this could seem funny to the audience as it is plainly obvious that McCann comes from Ireland. Secondly, McCann refuses to drink Scotch whisky, pouring himself Irish whisky instead. McCann is also characterised by his physical power. It is always he who carries out physical actions, such as breaking the glasses, bringing Stanley downstairs and fighting physically with him. McCann's physical power is easy to see but this power also causes him to act like a servant as he has to carry the suitcases and the alcohol. ...read more.

Conclusion

This is for several reasons: Firstly, he paints a picture of a good, family life which is hard to connect with his seduction of Lulu and his behaviour towards Stanley. Secondly, the way he describes his mother is almost identical to the way he describes his wife; the echoes in his description of them make it seem as though he is almost making them up. Lastly, we know Goldberg lies, for example he tells Petey that McCann is called Dermot and later on in the book he calls him Seamus, he also tells Petey that Stanley is alright. Lies seem to be quite important in this play, especially when talking about the past. Many of the characters lie to each other or at least say something which we could think was a lie. Stanley talks about being a concert pianist and his business, Goldberg talks about his family and Meg talks about hers, while Petey lies to Meg at the end about Stanley still being upstairs. Many of these lies do not seem to do any harm; in fact they seem to make the characters feel better about themselves as they become nostalgic and reflective. However, they add to the level of uncertainty which we find in the play and make it even harder for the audience to know what is going on. To conclude, Pinter takes advantage of both the verbal and the visual to emphasise certain things and explain them completely, such as the characters and their relationships, while also using them to show the themes of the play: Power, violence, fear and secrecy. He also uses it to relax the tension at times through humour but most of all it is used to create ambiguity. The audience can be sure of very few of the things that are said in this play which leads to many varied interpretations of the events and the characters. Perhaps this is what Pinter was hoping for. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Play Writes section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Play Writes essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The History Boys. Consider the significance of finding your way in life, in ...

    3 star(s)

    For instance, everybody agrees that Stalin is a monster, so he asks them to find descent, or anything to defend him. ?The question in essay is about what you know, it is not about what you don?t know,? he says.

  2. The Birthday Party, a comedy of menace (Pinter)

    As well as this we get a sense of Meg's stupidity, Petey's resignation to it and their relationship being unfruitful and routine from their humorous yet uninteresting dialogue. Indeed, half the reason what they say seems funny is because of how pointless it is.

  1. In the play Equus worship and passion are seen in many contrasting lights. In ...

    "FRANK: You sit in front of that thing long enough; you'll become stupid for life - like most of the population. The thing is it's a swiz. It seems to be offering you something, but actually it's taking something away. Your intelligence and your concentration, every minute you watch it.

  2. Max characterisation - The Homecoming

    He asks Ruth; "kiss me" as he feels ostracised as Ruth is paying attention to his sons as opposed to him. There is a question over Lenny's paternity, raised by constant hints that Jessie was unfaithful to Max and a "whore".

  1. Discuss the view that Tony Lumpkin in "She Stoops to Conquer"is nothing more than ...

    therefore he must find excitement in the most sullen situations, which seldom occupy the life of a ?bumpkin?. However, Tony often provides witty remarks which entertain the audience but also contradict the interpretation that Tony is just a ?bumpkin.? When acting as witness for the theft of Mrs Hardcastle?s ?bobs?,

  2. Scene by scene analysis of "Equus"

    Laugh as usual!" demonstrates the bad relationship between the couple. You don't really know what she means, but she shows anger and frustration through her reaction. (Act 01 ? Scene 08) Alan cries "Ek; Ek". He means "Equus; Equus". Alan is dreaming of his master.

  1. The play Cosi, written by Louis Nowra, supports the assumption that certain members of ...

    Additionally he begins to show the same lack of respect to Lewis when he chooses the patients over Nick. This is evident when he proceeds to call Lewis a ?nut? and tries to offend him by stating ?you (he) belongs here?, insinuating that he too should be institutionalised and separated from the rest of society.

  2. Comment on Sherriff's presentation of Stanhope in the first two acts of Journey's End.

    The tension comes to a head during Stanhope and Raleigh?s first; Stanhope is clearly greatly shocked to see Raleigh, as he ?stares at Raleigh as though dazed?. Raleigh, who ?takes a step forward, half raises his hand, then lets it drop to his side? evidently expected a different reception; Stanhope,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work