How does Shakespeare ensure that the theme of usurpation and its consequences runs throughout The Tempest?

Authors Avatar

How does Shakespeare ensure that the theme of usurpation and its consequences runs throughout The Tempest?

The Tempest is a late romance, which is a mixture of comedy and tragedy and during the play Shakespeare puts across his Church of England views on usurpation.

Before we discuss how Shakespeare ensures that the theme of usurpation and its consequences runs throughout The Tempest, we need to define the meaning of the term usurpation. Usurpation is when someone wrongfully seizes/assumes the power or the throne. An example of usurpation was when Napoleon usurped/seized the power from Louis XVI.

The main plot of the play is to do with Prospero seeking revenge on his brother for taking his place as the Duke of Milan and leaving him and his daughter Miranda adrift in a boat to die. Prospero wants order to be restored and for him to be back as the Duke of Milan.

During the play there are also two subplots involving a couple of people wanting to usurp the King of Naples and a group of three people wishing to usurp Prospero.

Some aspects of the idea of usurpation occurs in nearly every scene in the Shakespeare’s play “The Tempest” The theme also occurs in a verity of different circumstances and between different groups of people all wanting to overthrow the rightful person for there own benefit. The main way that Shakespeare has ensured that the theme of usurpation runs throughout the play is through repetition.

The first usurpation’s started way before the play began. For example his own brother Antonio usurped Prospero the rightful Duke of Milan; also Prospero usurped the island from Caliban for when Sycorax his mother died the island became his. There is proof of this in the play when we are first introduced to Caliban and he states that “Which at first was mine own King: and here you sty me. In this hard rock, while you do keep from me. The rest o’ th’ island”. However some Victorians may argue that in fact Caliban is lower than Prospero in the chain of being and there for Prospero did not usurp power. Although a modern audience would not see it this way and be sympathetic towards Caliban.

The play starts with Prospero usurping control of the king’s ship through his servant Ariel and the boatswain no longer was in charge of what was happening to the ship.

The sea was in control of the ship and although the boatswain was trying to keep everybody safe, Antonio and Sebastian did not realise that while onboard the ship the boatswain was the person who gives the orders and not the King. They do not appreciate the way things should be and had no respect for authority. When Antonio challenged the boatswain he quite rightly argued that “What cares these roarers for the name of King?” Although Sebastian was arguing that the king should be in charge he really wanted to be in control him self. There is proof of this when Antonio says, “Let’s all sink with the king” and he just says, “Let’s take leave of him”. The boatswain and the King believed that the storm was causes by god and that no one is higher up in the chain of being than god. While this was happening above deck the king had been praying below deck.

Join now!

Once everyone had been landed on shore in different groups Shakespeare continuously chopped and changed between scenes to show what was happening in different parts of the island as time went by.  

In act 1 scene 2 Prospero keeps the theme of usurpation going when he tells Miranda for the first time that he is the Duke of Milan. The fact that Miranda did not know this after twelve years of living with her father emphasises the distance between them both.

During the scene Prospero also explain how his brother came to power and states on pages 18 and ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

Avatar

There are some good points made in this essay and it is an interesting topic to explore. The theme is a good thread to follow through 'The Tempest' but the links must be made; so rather than looking at each point independently the structure of the play should be considered by linking the points and considering the direction of the whole play. All points should always be justified with evidence from the text; there are some good observations made about characters here but they do need to be supported.