• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How does Shakespeare explore the nature of evil in the play, 'Hamlet'?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Q. How does Shakespeare explore the nature of evil in the play, 'Hamlet'? 'Hamlet' is a Shakespearean revenge tragedy, which was a strong, and entertaining form of drama popular in the Elizabethan era during which Shakespeare (1562-1616) lived. 'Hamlet', like many of Shakespeare's plays has been inspired by another famous tragedy, in this case, 'The Spanish Tragedy', a revenge play written by Thomas Kyd. The great political turbulence that was taking place in England with conspiracies against the Queen and those in power could also have prompted Shakespeare to write a play like 'Hamlet'. Though the play is made up of the stock conventions of a typical revenge tragedy - a murder, with the ghost of the murdered returning to a loved one, the delay in vengeance, mental disturbance of the avenger and finally, the avenger's death, Shakespeare has made 'Hamlet' original by focusing on the psychology and tragedy of the characters and the situations. The characters in the play are like real people, and even though the play was written centuries ago, readers can still relate to their mentality, sensitivity and reactions to situations. The main character around whom the play revolves is Hamlet. He is the young Prince of Denmark, son of Gertrude and the nephew of the present King, Claudius. ...read more.

Middle

In the play, evil has been portrayed as a vice which, when desiring to destroy others, does not only that, but eventually ends up causing self-destruction as well, which has been shown in Laertes's death in Act 5, Scene 2 when he tells Osric, "I am justly killed with mine own treachery." From this point of view, Claudius's death is also ironic as Hamlet earlier says that, "Let it work/For 'tis the sport to have the enginer/Hoist with his own petard," and it shows that he is not as stupid as others make him out to be and knows what they are planning and already has a counter plot for it. And in this we case we see how the same poison that had been devised so as to kill Hamlet with has killed Claudius. Such an end shows how, though in, Shakespearean tragedies there is no poetic justice, good always triumphs and evil is destroyed. Yet, along with it, many others also suffer. In 'Hamlet', for instance, we see how Polonius had first been killed in the act of spying on Hamlet. Towards the end, Claudius and Laertes had been killed after conspiring to kill Hamlet, but it was not only them who had died. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Elizabethans, being devout Roman Catholics followed Christ's teachings of loving one's enemies and 'turning the other cheek' to one's assailants (Gospel of Luke, chapter 6). But at the same time, they were fascinated by revenge plays and this could be another reason why Shakespeare shows Hamlet torn between deciding whether to really do what the ghost had instructed him or to leave the fate of Claudius to God? In one way, he was avenging his father's death, but hadn't the Bible commanded him to do otherwise? Also, Hamlet's revenge would be tougher, as not only was he going to kill, an act forbidden by the sixth commandment, but, he was going to commit regicide - an act unimaginable in the Elizabethan times. This was because of their belief in the Divine Right of Kings, which was enforced by the ruling monarchs of their time. This meant that a king or a queen was God's representative on earth, who was protected in his function by the power of the Almighty and killing or even contradicting one was equivalent to sinning and the act would have terrible effects. Claudius mentions this in Act 4, Scene 5,"Do not fear our person/There's such divinity doth hedge a king" The descriptions of evil in the play show perhaps, Shakespeare's utter disgust and dislike of it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Hamlet section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Hamlet essays

  1. Scene by Scene - Hamlet.

    Trying to avenge a murder and set things to right, Hamlet has just committed another murder -- this one senseless. But Hamlet is so focused on his mother that he does not even pause to see who he has killed before he accuses his mother of complicity in the murder of his father.

  2. How does Shakespeare use language to describe Claudius as a villain?

    "Oh, 'tis too true" says Claudius. "How smart a lash that speech doth give my conscience!" Even a whore can look innocent when painted, and so his ugly deed looks honorable when clouded by pretty words. Still he feels the weight of his sin.

  1. Hamlet is known to be the most popular play written by Shakespeare.

    This is the only scene where mother and son are alone (excluding Polonius). Hence Shakespeare is able to bring out Hamlet's feelings and opinions about his mother's incestuous crime. His opening lines itself show his mockery of the rhythm and the words of her reprimand.

  2. Hamlet causes the deaths of many people by the end of Act 5. To ...

    Absolutely disgusted with the sexual passion. * As Claudius address the court in Act 1 scene 2 Hamlet is dressed all in black which suggest he is very different to everyone else and is made to stand out by the director so the audience can fell sympathy for the character as he is very lonely.

  1. Hamlet calls Claudius a king of

    from his mother due to the repulsiveness of the situation and also the disgust now shown from Hamlet to his mother. Hamlet also shows his anger to this situation (Act I, Scene 2), when he says, "A little more than kin, and less than kind!"

  2. Hamlet’s dilemma.

    He does not act, but instead, "acts," that is, plays mad, which cuts his behaviour off form the world of affairs in which action and inaction have no meaning. Hamlet's antic disposition becomes a form of inactive action, to which the analogy is the unvoiced speech of the wordplay.

  1. Show how Prince Hamlet was not entirely rotten but more of a product of ...

    But also in the Renaissance there was a new growing belief in the Classical cultures values as many people believed it to be the ultimate culture. This was called Renaissance Humanism. Humanists believed in the notion that man could achieve an almost god-like excellence, like the Romans and Greeks did.

  2. Criticism on Hamlet

    - is well worthy of notice. The fancy, that a burlesque was intended, sinks below criticism: the lines, as epic narrative, are superb. In the thoughts, and even in the separate parts of the diction, this description is highly poetical: in truth, taken by itself, this is its fault that it is too poetical!

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work