How does the author of The Withered Arm make the incredible events appear credible?

Authors Avatar

How does the author of The Withered Arm make the incredible events appear credible?

In this assignment, I am going to discuss how Thomas Hardy makes the incredible events appear credible. To do this I will be examining: the historical contents of the story, with the language used, together with the way the story was structured and by the way that the characters relate to each other. I will also be examining the moral attitudes of when the story was written. Which will enable me to show how it was possible for Hardy to make the advents appear credible. The Withered Arm is an example of prose. Prose is ‘speech or writing without rhyme or metre’ (Collins Dictionary), as opposed to verse, which is ‘stanza or short subdivision of poem or the Bible’, (Collins Dictionary).

The story was written in 1888, and set around the 1820’s within a rural community. Hardy refers to this period in time by writing the ‘Enclosure Acts had not taken effect’ (p19), which occurred in 1836 and when he refers to a boy due to be hung, he writes ‘only just turned eighteen, and only present by chance when the rick was fired’ (p21).  This again indicates the date was around this period as the gradual reforms of the Penal Codes came into effect by 1861, which meant that only serious crimes such as treason and murder carried the death penalty (mastering econ & social history).  

Hardy adds realism to the story in several ways. He uses his vast knowledge of the mass changes within the rural areas during this period, for example: ‘Egdon was much less fragmentary in character than now’ and  ‘farmers’ wives’ rode on horseback then more than they do now’ (p19). With what appears to be direct speech from a third party narrator, he also adds factual event such as ‘tis sold by the inch afterwards’ (p19) as this is where the expression of ‘money for old rope’ stems from and dates back to when the hangman would sells inch long souvenirs after the execution (). This not only adds to the authenticity of the story, but also leads the reader into believing it is a factual account rather than a fictional story.

Hardy also adds to the possibility of the story being credible by establishing the history and preconceived ideas of the characters through the milkmaids. This is done by the milkmaids talking not only in slang but also using local dialect such as ‘pinking’ and ‘milchers’ (p2) which would only be relevant within the countryside, they also refer to the farmer as’ he’  (p1), which would indicate that the farmer has social standing. This is then confirmed when we are introduced to Rhoda and learn that her isolation from the rest of the milkmaids was due to her having a child out of wedlock with the farmer. This is illustrated within the text by:

Join now!

‘milked somewhat apart from the rest’ and ‘their course lay apart from that of the others, to a lonely spot high above the water-meads’ (p2).  Although the milkmaids seem to have some compassion for Rhoda’s plight, the following conversation: ‘Tis hard for she’ and ‘He ha’n’t spoke to Rhoda Brook for years’ (p2) seems to have been contrived to show that due to the differences in class, Rhoda has been forced to solely take the burden of the affair which was a typical Victorian attitude towards the morals of unmarried mothers.

In addition to this, by the use of ...

This is a preview of the whole essay