• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How does the beginning of 'Of mice and men' differ from chapters one and two of the novel? Why do you think these changes have been made? How successful do you think the start of the film is?

Extracts from this document...


How does the beginning of 'Of mice and men' differ from chapters one and two of the novel? Why do u think these changes have been made? How successful do you think the start of the film is? During this essay we will be looking at the novel of "mice and men" written by John Steinebeck, and comparing it to the film directed by Gary Sinse, who stars in it himself alongside John Malcolvich. This film was created in 1992. The novel was derived from an idea taken from the poem "to a mouse" written by Robert Burns. In the novel chapter one takes place on a riverside beach where Lennie and George arrive on their way to the ranch, just up the road, where they will work the next day. The two men decide to stay the night on this spot, and will go to the ranch in the morning. Chapter two begins with the men arriving at the ranch where they are greeted by Candy, one of the characters from the ranch, who works as the swamper. Candy shows the men to their bunkhouse, which is very basic. ...read more.


This is a new scene they have added to the beginning of the film, which wasn't in the book I think they did this to try and clearly explain why the two men are on the run and to make a dramatic start instantly grabbing the watchers eye. When they are walking to the ranch along a road the bus which they took to a nearby town drives past them which wasn't in the book as the book starts off later on, when there by the pool. These extra scenes were probably added as a new start because the start in the book is somewhat unclear. When filmmakers are making a film out of a novel they often change scenes around, put them in a different order or merge them together. This is done to shorten the film so they can use different scenes in the book and merge them together in the film saving time as the novel is much longer than the film and the film cant possibly last as long as the novel. In the film of mice and men they have tried to do this. The scene where George takes the dead mouse off Lennie and throws it away is in a different order, in the novel ...read more.


I consider the way that the actors portrayed the characters from the novel, interoperating the smallest details of each person to create the perfect partnership between the two men, which is apparent in the novel. I feel that the settings chosen for the film were also very well selected to fit in with this description from the novel. As we only compared the first two scenes of the novel to the film, we didn't watch much of the film, so cannot really criticise it as haven't been able to get a good idea of how well the film was made, although from what I have seen so far I cannot seem to find any criticism. I feel he changes made did not alienate any part of the story, if anything increased the excitement, as it is easy to grow bored when watching a film, but I didn't grow tiresome of this production. I enjoyed the layout of the film, it flowed at a steady pace but didn't rush the story so was easy to grasp the story line. Not at any point was the film confusing or complicated. It was easy to watch and kept me interested throughout. Over all I enjoyed the film, and of what I saw of it was very well directed, acted, and produced. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level John Steinbeck section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level John Steinbeck essays

  1. Of Mice and Men diary entry

    in the distance I could see birds swarming out from a canopy of trees, they headed towards a mountain in the even further distance. I don't know why but I felt this sudden urge to investigate the area where the noise had come from.

  2. The Soledad Times Monday 26th July - Double murder at Soledad Ranch shocks local ...

    Small to murder her? We will never know. We also found out from a reliable source, who wishes to remain nameless, that Mr. Small and Mr. Milton often traveled from ranch to ranch together in the hope of finding work and collecting a sum before moving on again.

  1. Of Mice and Men - The differences between the book and the film.

    There is a stronger focus on the fact that people are against Lennie and George. The film shows this with the bus driver not taking the two men to the ranch, in the book this is not shown. The idea of Lennie and George being icons of American culture for example "two men bonding around the fire."

  2. Of Mice and Men: Alternative ending for the final chapter.

    George and Candy went into one of the other barns alone so they could talk over what to do about the 'undead'. They decided to leave that night, Candy would clear out his bank account which he had been saving for so long and George decided to do a big heist on the ranch that night.

  1. Do you think that the ending to 'Of Mice and Men' is satisfactory?

    Lennie really wants to tend rabbits and give them an alfalfa patch. This dream is the only thing that keeps them going, even though this is the dream of most of the men at this time. Due to the unpredictability of Lennie they are constantly between jobs and one step away from their dreams.

  2. A prequel to 'Of Mice and Men' - Drawn together.

    "Lennie, you crazy bastard, you all right?" George shouted desperately. An impressed sound came from behind George "That was pretty neat Milton, make um' do summit' else!" at that moment Lennie came bursting through the rapid surface of the river.

  1. Of mice and men - Show how the constant suggestion and realisation of anger ...

    employees who are working at the ranch and at this point they are talking about crooks who's a stable buck and so this incident shows us that the personas are colour prejudiced and at this point the reader is in mixed emotions, depending on your ethnic background, as I have experienced it myself.

  2. Steinbeck uses many techniques to present the characters of Lennie and George in Of ...

    The reader can tell lots about Lennie through the description of his character?s physical looks and actions ?opposite, a huge man, shapeless of face.? From this physical description, the reader can analyse that Lennie is the uncivilised character. He is featureless, an image of an animal with the basic instincts to stay alive.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work