• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"How far do you agree that we are moved to sympathy, even to admiration, by Richard's journey to awareness?"

Extracts from this document...


"How far do you agree that we are moved to sympathy, even to admiration, by Richard's journey to awareness?" Because King Richard is the eponymous character of this play, it is his emotional journey which readers follow in details. Through the play, numerous traits of his personality are clearly exposed, giving readers plenty of evidence on which to form opinions. In the opening scene of the play, Richard at first comes across as an authoritative ruler, with full control over the situation and an evident sense of fairness and justice. This gives readers scope to feel admiration for him, because he is apparently displaying vital qualities in a good monarch. However, it is not long before Richard slips up and allows his weakness to be exposed. After regally announcing, "We were not born to serve, but to command", he immediately falters and adds "Which since we cannot do..." This shows from the beginning that Richard is not a king capable of impressing us with authority and strength of mind, which I found to weaken the chance of me admiring him. ...read more.


I cannot, however, feel admiration for Richard. The way in which he hands over his reign, with no logical reasoning, is enough to make me see him as clueless, overreacting, and not in control of his own mind, let alone a country. The quick changes of emotional outlook, for example when he moves from hopelessly speaking of "the deaths of kings" to announcing his divine rights and believing himself to be capable of anything, make him appear over-the-top, false, and insincere in his apparent strong emotions. In the director Mark Rylance's interpretation of the play, he played Richard as a dithering idiot, encouraging the audience to laugh at him like an indecisive child. While many viewers and critics of this performance disapprove of this characterisation, I thought it was effective in making us realise how hopeless, lacking in authority, and frankly idiotic Richard acts in various scenes of the play. In Act V, Richard's soliloquy while locked up alone, stripped of all power, should have the potential to make readers feel sympathy for him. ...read more.


Shakespeare would have written this play to be performed before Queen Elizabeth I, not only as an educational history lesson but most likely also as a lesson in successful monarchy. His portrayal of a king would have shown her how NOT to act as a reigning monarch. Richard is easily defeated, confused by reality, and all too often wallowing in self-pity. Ultimately, Richard is only human, and his vulnerability makes it impossible for me not to feel a certain amount of pity for him, at times. Therefore I agree that his journey moves readers to sympathy. However, as well as being a human, he is also a ruler of a country, which should make him authoritative, confident and in control. In my opinion he is none of these. A fool with no grasp of reality is dangerous when given power. Richard has too many weaknesses and flaws which are revealed in this play, traits which do not provoke respect. Therefore I cannot agree that I am moved as far as admiration for Richard. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Richard II section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Richard II essays

  1. Explore Shakespeare's presentation of Kingship in Richard II

    draw the audience's attention to the relationship between being "royal" and having "noble blood". Richard's comment "let's purge without blood" also suggests his keenness to prevent some sort of conflict between him and Bolingbroke. This could be interpreted as showing his pacifistic side as demonstrated in the scene of the

  2. How does Shakespeare portray the character of Richard?

    of London that helped people know his location and subsequently help them plot Richards death, "They love not poison that do poison need, nor do I thee: though I did wish him dead, I hate the murderer, love him murdered.

  1. Write about the dramatic methods used by Shakespeare to portray the character of Queen ...

    "But soft, but see, or rather do not see my fair rose wither." The quality of language used here by Shakespeare expresses Isabel's love for Richard as well as her desperation and inability to bear the change of circumstances which find them in a situation where they have to part.

  2. Richard II. John of Gaunts patriotic assault on the unpopular Richard would appeal greatly ...

    This is extremely dramatic. The patriotic audience would be wholly frustrated by Richard's dismissive attitude towards the nationalistic Gaunt and his "sad tale". Richard cynically accuses Gaunt of not being "sick", moreover, he reminds the audience that he is eagerly awaiting Gaunt's death when he refers to him as "aged".

  1. What do we learn of the motivations & characters of both Richard & Clarence ...

    Clarence also says, "That, as I am a Christian faithful man" which then draws up the audience's empathy. Standing alone, Clarence is a religious man, however in comparison to Richard it is an incredibly stark contrast.

  2. Power and Betrayal in Shakespears Power and Betrayal.

    subject to his King, and promises to surrender his army upon the returning of the lands and title which Richard seized to Bolingbroke, Gaunt's rightful heir. Otherwise, Bolingbroke will wage war against the King. Henry Bolingbroke Upon his knees doth kiss King Richard's hand, And sends allegiance and true faith

  1. 'Richard II' by William Shakespeare

    Of course, Bolingbroke had his estate taken away from him when he was exiled perhaps a little unfairly, and he seemed to be the only man of real power that could see the faults in Richard as a king. Richard however just seems to be a little unfortunate to be in some of the situations he is in.

  2. How is Richard II portrayed in Act I?

    However, as the Act continues we realise that although Richard is King of England so along with the title comes extraordinary wealth and power, Richard is not all that powerful and authoritative.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work