How is Alex characterised by Burgess in Part 1 of A Clockwork Orange?

Authors Avatar by gabriellafaye (student)

How is Alex characterised by Burgess in Part 1 of ‘A Clockwork Orange?’       Gabriella Guy

In “A Clockwork Orange”, the character of Alex is both the protagonist and the vessel used to impart the novels unusual views on morality. At face value, Alex is portrayed as a psychopath who robs, rapes, and assaults innocent people chosen at random for his own amusement, showing no remorse for his actions. He is the classic example of an “evil individual”, almost unrealistically so. He even has the intellectual capacity to know that this sort of behaviour is wrong, saying that "you can't have a society with everybody behaving in my manner of the night". He nevertheless professes to be somewhat puzzled by the motivations of those who wish to reform him and others like him, saying that he would never interfere with their desire to be good; it's just that he "goes to the other shop". It is almost as if, although he has the logical capacity to understand the concept of morality, there is not a single shred of “innate morality” in him that which is believed to be a defining aspect of human nature in Judeo-Christian influenced western thought and is also the position the novel adopts. Alex is the perfect set piece around which the novels message that morality is not clear cut black or white revolves.

From the moment we are introduced to Alex in the ‘Korova Milkbar’ we are told of how he and his ‘droogs’ drink milk laced with drugs. The Korova milk bar itself is quite a public place and we are made aware of how many people use this as a place to obtain these drugs and escape through hallucinations. Alex describes how a man was ‘well away with his glazzies glazed’ and thinks of these people as ‘very cowardly’ using hallucinogenic drugs as a method of escape. It is at this point we begin to feel a sense of sorrow and despair for the people who live in this world as it would seem it has become the norm to take drugs to escape and through this we briefly pity Alex. However, it is not long until we see Alex’s intentions for the evening. It becomes almost comical that he is able to describe these people as ‘cowardly’ when he himself was consuming the drugs until as he describes ‘I could feel the knives in the old moloko starting to prick and now I was ready for a bit of twenty-to-one’. His violent nature immediately becomes apparent as he continuously engages in unprovoked acts of violence. It is not only shocking that Alex preys on the innocent, but that we are made to be distracted from the incredibly harsh and violent acts by the strange and unfamiliar dialect of ‘Nadsat’ which Alex uses when he describes things associated with violence. Alex even changes the word ‘good’ to ‘horrorshow’ based on the Russian word kharasho. 

Join now!

Something which is focused in on throughout the novel but most notably in part 1 is Alex’s remorselessness. I would not argue that it is the acts of violence Alex commits which would characterises him as being ‘remorseless’, but  I would argue it is the people he prays upon that gives this point any ground. We see in the first chapter when Alex, accompanied by his droogs prey on a man walking home from the local library with books under his arm. An equally important ‘violent act’ of Alex’s would be when he and his ‘droogs’ break into the cottage ...

This is a preview of the whole essay