• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How reliable and useful are the poem "a Terre" by Wilfred Owen and the painting "Harvest Of Battle" by CRW Nevinson for an historian studying battle conditions in World War 1?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How reliable and useful are the poem "a Terre" by Wilfred Owen and the painting "Harvest Of Battle" by CRW Nevinson for an historian studying battle conditions in World War 1? The two sources explaining the conditions of World War 1 inform us in different ways, one is a painting, which tells us that during the war there was pain and violence. The painting looks as though wild beats have come and destroyed mankind. There are dead men lying on the muddy battle fields of no mans land and injured men walking away form the war. You can still see what is left of the barbed wire used to defend the enemies' trenches. Also the other source which is the poem creates a mental image inside your head. ...read more.

Middle

In the trenches men stood for hours on end in water logged trenches without being able to remove wet socks or boots. The feet would gradually go numb and the skin would turn red or blue. The poem also does not tell you about trench life and what it was like. Men in trenches suffered form lice. They are a pale fawn color and they leave blotchy red bite marks all over the body. They created a stale smell. Various methods were used to remove the lice. The most effected being, with a lighted candle try to burn the lice without burning your clothes. As well as causing frenzied itching, the lice carried a disease - pyrrexhia or trench fever. Although the disease did not kill, it stopped soldiers from fighting and accounted for about 15% of all cases of sickness in the British army. ...read more.

Conclusion

The poem is a more reliable source. This is because Wilfred Owen is a poet and can get to the feelings and emotions that the soldiers are feeling and thinking his poem shows us this. The soldier wants to grow old and bald he does no longer care the children make fun of him he has proved himself as a strong soldier. Even though the soldier feels he has taken the cowards way out of war by being injured. The poem gives more information of how the soldiers may have felt in the trenches, how they felt about war. The poem gives facts of one soldier's injuries. The painting is just simply a picture although it shows us that the armies had barbed wire to protect their trenches and shows what no mans land may have looked like, it does not go into enough detail about the disease trench foot. It does not show soldiers with lice on there clothes. All it shows it death and pain. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. The Battle of the Somme - source related study.

    The Source also shows us that the British conscripted their soldiers and had a keen interest to see how they have coped throughout the war and how many survived. Source C though does has similarities with Source A but also contradicts the paragraph by showing the deaths of the soldiers

  2. The Battle of the Somme 1916

    Also, he did not lose his nerve; he didn't quit and went ahead with his plan despite all the pressure and the criticism. It is true that all his main objectives were accomplished at the end of the battle of the Somme.

  1. How useful are Sources A, B and M to an historian studying the attitudes ...

    Overall, this source was ultimately produced to entertain people during the war, with biased over exaggerated public opinions and it's factual accuracy is very imprecise and unreliable to an historian

  2. The year 1916 was the year of the Battle of the Somme.

    Another scene that seems fake is the scene showing the British soldiers running across No-Mans Land. The reason following my judgement of this scene is that the orders given by the officers were to walk across No-mans land and wear full kit; the exact opposite of what the soldiers in the clip did.

  1. The Battle of the Somme 1916 - source related study.

    the left side of Source G, behind one of the standing officers. Shell holes were usually very big, and in the winter months would have filled with water and mud. So, if a soldier were to fall in one of these shell holes, it would have been nearly very difficult

  2. How Useful are Sources A, B and M to an Historian Studying the Attitudes ...

    This suggests that although it was one person's opinion it was not meant to persuade anybody and wouldn't have been affected by propaganda or events in Britain. Also it would have been written after experiencing the war.

  1. Which one of these is more useful to an historian as evidence about conditions ...

    Proves that men would not stand up above the trench because of snipers. The soldier who was snipered he was standing outside his dugout and he still got snipered, so the soldier in source G was bound to get snipered.

  2. How useful are sources A, B and M to an historian studying the attitudes ...

    This was in an attempt to ensure obedience on the part of the lower ranking soldiers that comprised the majority of the army. By the Battle of the Somme, disillusionment had begun to set in at the realisation of the horrors and reality of trench warfare and the joy on

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work