• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How significant is the title in Michael Fraynes text, Spies?

Extracts from this document...


How significant is the title in Michael Frayne's text, Spies? The main theme of spying is explored throughout the novel. To explore this theme Frayne has created powerful characters that present the qualities of a true spy. He achieves this using effective narrative and language techniques. Conclusively Frayn has developed a novel full of suspense and mystery. Within spies, Frayn has used rich, nostalgic text to explore its main theme of spying. The title itself represents darkness, secrecy and danger. Frayn has deliberately placed many hidden clues which undoubtably leave us puzzled and ultimately turn us into spies. Moreover, several characters in the text spy on one another or are being spied upon. To add to this the older Stephen himself spies on his younger self. At the beginning of the novel the younger Stephen would often visit his friend Keith. Being boys they would regularly play games associated with mystery and danger, espionage for example. ...read more.


'Cabbalistic moon' is a reference to Judaism. Another implication is the 'staying on Friday nights'. 'Sheeny' is what Stephen used to get called at school by his peers, the word sheeny is a contemptuous term for a Jewish person. Furthermore Stephen and his family were referred to as 'juice' this represent the innocent minds of the children being poisoned by corrupt thoughts, the word juice is ironic as the setting is in WW2. The espionage adventure involves the spying on Keith's mother which is conducted by Stephen and Keith. The boys follow Mrs.'s Hayward around and record her activities in their logbook. The logbook represents the seriousness of the whole adventure; the boys are very keen to help with the war effort. The quotations 'we have to make sacrifices for the war effort' as they 'have to endure hardship for the sake of the duration' support this idea. Ironically misspells secret... 'Keith crosses out BIRDS and writes LOGBOOK SECRIT' this underlines the childhood aspect. ...read more.


Frayn invokes a sense of mystery at the beginning. The narrator describes the privet having a 'sweet and luring reek' this oxymoron represents the doubt that fills the narrators mind at the time. This indicates even the older Stephen is still bewildered by all the unresolved events that took place in the past. 'For a moment I'm a child again' this phrase has a dream-like quality to it which suggest that the place has awoken his senses. This leaves the reader questioning as to why a shrub can trigger such strong emotions. This engages the reader's attention, which leaves us with a sense of mystery and suspense. Keith and Stephen are both very secretive about their adventure; this gives their characters a spy-like quality. When they are in the privet they mention 'no one in the world can see us'. Stephen also has a very courageous character as he follows Keith's mother to the tunnels. The setting, which is at nighttime, adds an element of concern and danger. In addition Frayn describes the scene through the young Stephen himself this makes us feel much more closer to the experience. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Authors section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Authors essays

  1. How Effectively Does Frayn Use Barbara Berrill in 'Spies'?

    One of these is that it lightens up the tone considerably, which engages the reader a little more and gives much more variety to the pace and involvement with the story than if it had all been in the same manner and makes for more interesting reading.


    Is there someone in the trees? Is there something waiting to pounce on Steven? Theses are possibilities that must enter Stevens mind. Every sound drives fear into Steven.. Even the "murmurs of the telegraph wires" at first play Russian roulette with Steven's nerves until he comforts himself with the fact he has heard them before.

  1. Analyse how Frayn presents relationships between adults and children in Spies

    shown to be false when it is invaded by the Barbara Berrill and Mrs. Hayward. Furthermore, the cigarette butt found in the hideout shows traces of adult trespassing. Likewise, we also see another interesting dimension between the relationships of adults and children in Keith and Mr.

  2. With detailed reference to at least 3 symbols explore how Frayn employs symbolism in ...

    in the lookout' Stephens's realisation that Mrs Hayward is not a spy after all is one of the dramatic points in the story. Germs and Germans us one of the most commonly used symbols in the novel as the whole plot is based around Keith and Stephen's assumption that Keith's mother is a German spy.

  1. Use Of Recurring Motifs In "Spies" By Michael Frayn

    tell Keith fearing to hurt Keith's ego and this shows Frayn's varied use of the word and reflects the structure of the novel due to how the privet slowly changes the story line from Keith and Stephen to Keith versus Stephen.

  2. How does Frayn present young Stephen in the first three chapters of "Spies"? How ...

    Thank you. Thank you." I believe that this quote really shows Stephen's usual mindset, seeming to the reader as if he is always grateful; grateful for being allowed to be Keith's friends, for being allowed to be in his house, for being allowed to talk to him.

  1. "The Horseman in the Sky" by Ambrose Bierce has many meanings in the title ...

    He knew it was his father when he looked into his eyes, but after this encounter, it is ironic how he refers to his dad as just the "horseman", and not his father. He refers to his dad with vague descriptions of a "man on horseback"(31), or "the group of

  2. Discuss the relationship between Keith and Stephen that is presented in the first Six ...

    Looking back, he believes that his plain name 'Stephen Wheatley' or just 'Stephen' didn't suit the boy he used to be, it was too normal as him and his family was apparently not quite right. His elder brother was 'insufferable' and it made him so frustrated that he would 'shout

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work