• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Useful are Sources A, B and M to an Historian Studying the Attitudes of British Soldiers to their Commanders During the First World War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How Useful are Sources A, B and M to an Historian Studying the Attitudes of British Soldiers to their Commanders During the First World War? Sources A, B and M are useful in telling you about the attitudes of British soldiers and their commanders; but source M varies the view that is in the others as it is an officers opinion when writing about a dead soldier. None of the sources I am evaluating have the date they were written on them, so there is a slight doubt about their usefulness to an historian. But I know that Siegfried Sassoon was a soldier in the British army and that he is also one of the most influential war poets. It is well known that all of his poetry was written either during the period that he was fighting in or in the mental hospital he was taken to after he had served. This enhances the usefulness of the source because it was written near to the time of the war and the writer also had first hand experience of the emotions felt by soldiers towards their commanders; but the simple fact that he ...read more.

Middle

Through my own knowledge, it is clear that the content in source A is a little false because there was a lot of discipline in the British army at the time of the First World War. This meant that the soldiers didn't want to publicly disgrace the people of higher rank to them in the army. This is shown by the second source (B) as the poet accuses the general's staff of "incompetent swine," which eventually led him to being branded 'mental.' But the content of this source is very true as the soldiers died very quickly once the trained soldiers were killed in warfare. I also understand that there was a huge incompetence in the staff of Sir Douglas Haig as his intelligence did inform him falsely by telling him that fewer soldiers were dying in the field than actually were. However, the content in source M is of great contrast to the other sources, it is written out of respect and so will be a little exaggerated. But just this fact shows that there was a relationship between the ranks out of respect if nothing else. ...read more.

Conclusion

Source M however was written by somebody on the front-line to the parents of a "fine unselfish, comrade," so would have been written under hard circumstances as the man who wrote it was meant to guide the dead soldier to victory. This means that it has little significance to the relationship between those in Britain and those on the front-line, but is very useful in describing the way that the front-line officers felt almost like parents to the soldiers. Finally in Sources A and B, there are no specific criticisms towards the commanders; but instead broad ideas that the authors thought should be improved. If there had been criticisms about the creeping barrage as an attack instead of just "by his plan of attack," then the arguments would have been more reliable as it would have been clear that the writers had researched their arguments. Although the sources show specific opinions of the attitudes towards the senior ranks, there are conflicting views and so no source can be said to be useful for a historian writing on the attitudes within the army as a whole. However all three sources would be useful for proving that there were different relationships in the army depending on personalities and personal feelings. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Show how Winifred M. Letts in

    3 star(s)

    This is what a war can be like. There are two points of view in this poem. The point of view of the mother, who is weak and fragile. The view of the Brother Officer, who delivered the letter to her, and did not like her son, Jack.

  2. How useful are Sources A, B and M to an historian studying the attitudes ...

    Therefore its reliability and accuracy is questionable in that, the views incorporated into the cartoon were not of someone experiencing the war. Soldiers didn't read this magazine that much and they preferred publications such as the 'Wipers Times' casting further doubt over the source.

  1. How Useful are Sources A, B and M to a Historian Studying the Attitudes ...

    Both Sources A and B back up this stereotype. Source A is a piece of propaganda from the magazine 'Punch'. Propaganda, especially after the war, promotes and in many cases exaggerates the incompetence of the generals during the war. The truth is that every soldier's war was different, and every soldier, therefore had a different experience at the front.

  2. What attitudes towards the First World War have you found in the poetry you ...

    The poet's purpose in writing the poem was to help persuade people, men in particular to join the war or otherwise your life will simply be worthless and a complete misery. During the war many propaganda posters/songs and poems were established to help persuade and convince people going to war is a great and fascinating experience.

  1. Were the British Generals like Sir Douglas Haig responsible for the high casualty figures?

    Martin Middlebrook I 1971 wrote this quote. It is a secondary piece of evidence. It was written for a history textbook named 'The First Day of the Somme'. This quote tells us that the British walking over to the trenches in waves and carrying heavy loads was a mistake.

  2. In 1915 a British newspaper printed a letter from a

    Trench foot, a fungal infection caused by these cold, wet and unsanitary conditions was common in the early years of the war and could result in amputation if the infection turned gangrenous. The infantry had little faith left in their leaders. As Andrew Bowie remembers: "It was a bloody massacre.

  1. Explain the changing attitudes of civilians and British soldiers towards the War.

    Pub opening times were cut and alcoholic drinks were watered down. Railways were under government control and the coalmines were also to be run by the government. Under the DORA, the government converted land for farm production. The women's land armies were used to recruit women workers for the farms and other places in short of workers.

  2. How useful are sources A, B and M to an historian studying the attitudes ...

    As such, it is more useful than source A for answering the above question due to its portrayal of an individual occurrence from the point of view of an officer and because it was written on the battlefield. Within the armed forces, the official relationship between soldiers and officers was one of deference.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work