• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Useful are Sources A, B and M to an Historian Studying the Attitudes of British Soldiers to their Commanders During the First World War?

Extracts from this document...


How Useful are Sources A, B and M to an Historian Studying the Attitudes of British Soldiers to their Commanders During the First World War? Sources A, B and M are useful in telling you about the attitudes of British soldiers and their commanders; but source M varies the view that is in the others as it is an officers opinion when writing about a dead soldier. None of the sources I am evaluating have the date they were written on them, so there is a slight doubt about their usefulness to an historian. But I know that Siegfried Sassoon was a soldier in the British army and that he is also one of the most influential war poets. It is well known that all of his poetry was written either during the period that he was fighting in or in the mental hospital he was taken to after he had served. This enhances the usefulness of the source because it was written near to the time of the war and the writer also had first hand experience of the emotions felt by soldiers towards their commanders; but the simple fact that he ...read more.


Through my own knowledge, it is clear that the content in source A is a little false because there was a lot of discipline in the British army at the time of the First World War. This meant that the soldiers didn't want to publicly disgrace the people of higher rank to them in the army. This is shown by the second source (B) as the poet accuses the general's staff of "incompetent swine," which eventually led him to being branded 'mental.' But the content of this source is very true as the soldiers died very quickly once the trained soldiers were killed in warfare. I also understand that there was a huge incompetence in the staff of Sir Douglas Haig as his intelligence did inform him falsely by telling him that fewer soldiers were dying in the field than actually were. However, the content in source M is of great contrast to the other sources, it is written out of respect and so will be a little exaggerated. But just this fact shows that there was a relationship between the ranks out of respect if nothing else. ...read more.


Source M however was written by somebody on the front-line to the parents of a "fine unselfish, comrade," so would have been written under hard circumstances as the man who wrote it was meant to guide the dead soldier to victory. This means that it has little significance to the relationship between those in Britain and those on the front-line, but is very useful in describing the way that the front-line officers felt almost like parents to the soldiers. Finally in Sources A and B, there are no specific criticisms towards the commanders; but instead broad ideas that the authors thought should be improved. If there had been criticisms about the creeping barrage as an attack instead of just "by his plan of attack," then the arguments would have been more reliable as it would have been clear that the writers had researched their arguments. Although the sources show specific opinions of the attitudes towards the senior ranks, there are conflicting views and so no source can be said to be useful for a historian writing on the attitudes within the army as a whole. However all three sources would be useful for proving that there were different relationships in the army depending on personalities and personal feelings. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Show how Winifred M. Letts in

    3 star(s)

    This is what a war can be like. There are two points of view in this poem. The point of view of the mother, who is weak and fragile. The view of the Brother Officer, who delivered the letter to her, and did not like her son, Jack.

  2. Were the British Generals like Sir Douglas Haig responsible for the high casualty figures?

    These sources support each other in the theory that Haig made two major mistakes in the third battle of Ypres. All these sources state that the bombardment at Passendeale and the decision to attack the Ypres salient was a mistake.

  1. Explain the changing attitudes of civilians and British soldiers towards the War.

    DORA allowed the government to control mass media. During the first few months of the war, casualties were bad but none of this got through, even to Parliament. Newspapers ere full of British heroism and German atrocities. But after the Battle of the Somme, the British propaganda machine made a staged short film before the offensive.

  2. How useful are Sources A, B and M to an historian studying the attitudes ...

    Therefore its reliability and accuracy is questionable in that, the views incorporated into the cartoon were not of someone experiencing the war. Soldiers didn't read this magazine that much and they preferred publications such as the 'Wipers Times' casting further doubt over the source.

  1. How Useful are Sources A, B and M to a Historian Studying the Attitudes ...

    Both Sources A and B back up this stereotype. Source A is a piece of propaganda from the magazine 'Punch'. Propaganda, especially after the war, promotes and in many cases exaggerates the incompetence of the generals during the war. The truth is that every soldier's war was different, and every soldier, therefore had a different experience at the front.

  2. What attitudes towards the First World War have you found in the poetry you ...

    I found this poem very disheartening because the poet uses very strong words and phrases to emphasize the severe condition of the innocent soldiers. Fall In by H. Begbie This poem is about the consequences certain men will face who decided not to join the war and who didn't help take part in their country's victory.

  1. In 1915 a British newspaper printed a letter from a

    The rats caused infection, contaminated food, and remained a pest for the duration of the war. Lice too, flourished in the trench conditions and bred in the seems of filthy cloths-plentiful in the trenches- causing epidemics of Trench Fever- a "particularly painful disease."

  2. How useful are sources A, B and M to an historian studying the attitudes ...

    As such, it is more useful than source A for answering the above question due to its portrayal of an individual occurrence from the point of view of an officer and because it was written on the battlefield. Within the armed forces, the official relationship between soldiers and officers was one of deference.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work