• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How well does the development of children's understanding of English grammar support any one of the theories of language acquisition which you have studied?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How well does the development of children's understanding of English grammar support any one of the theories of language acquisition which you have studied? It is my opinion that children's understanding of grammar can be used to support any of the theories of language acquisition, and I also believe that many aspects of the different theories are used when a child acquires language. However, I have decided to use evidence to support the Innateness theory proposed by Noam Chomsky. The innateness theory suggests that a child is born with an innate capacity to learn language; the brain is programmed and ready for language at birth. When a child is expose to speech, principals for structuring and learning language automatically develop. ...read more.

Middle

For example `man kick ball'. Children possess knowledge of this structure from birth and this explains why they can learn language at such an incredible speed. Linguistic universals throughout all languages can also be explained by Chomkys theory. The innateness theory explains why children from all cultures pass through similar stages of language acquisition and development. Evidence (see `Revision Express - English Language AS an A2') suggests that children of a different language base will apparently acquire language at roughly the same. Evidence shows that children begin to use and improve their language skills in their second year whether they are actually `taught' or not. It seems from this that children are using a Language Acquisition Device; as long as they are exposed to language the LAD helps them to use primary linguistic data (input) ...read more.

Conclusion

Children use their Language Acquisition Device in order to use the correct inflections when they form the past tense or pluralise. The innateness theory is also supported by the fact that children use their LAD to get uncommon plurals and past tenses wrong as they are following regular grammatical rules. For instance using the common grammatical rule a child may put `-ed' on the end of a word (`loved' for instance) to form the past tense. However using these same rules provided by the LAD s/he may say `comed' instead of `came'. This shows the innateness theory in action. In conclusion I believe that the Chomsky's innateness theory plays a big part in the language acquisition of children, however I also think that the Cognitive theory and interaction are needed to ensure that the child becomes fluent in the language. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Language: Context, Genre & Frameworks section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Language: Context, Genre & Frameworks essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Investigating how language has changed in children's literature; in relation to interaction between ...

    5 star(s)

    Phonology * It would seem that, the more modern the text, the less techniques are used in the initial description; possibly intended to give the reader enough information to keep them interested (while not revealing too much). Therefore there is no rhyme or puns which could deviate from the description.

  2. How do Politicians gain support through language? AQA English coursework

    Each speech was designed to persuade the audience, boost the party's image, and restore faith in the party leader. Each speech was approximately 17 A4 pages long. Key linguistic features were chosen and the speeches were analysed as a whole.

  1. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the argument that children have an innate capacity ...

    Piaget was a psychologist who viewed language acquisition as a case of general human learning. He has not suggested, however, that the development is not innate, but only that there is no specific language unit. Piaget's view was then that the development (i.e.

  2. A one to one interaction with an elderly woman Aunty Emily to try through ...

    I felt she would feel intimidated and because it would be wrong for me to make thoughts about touch since we both have different cultural backgrounds. TONE: I tried as much as I could to make my voice sound willing and formal throughout the times I spoke with Emily.

  1. Free essay

    Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the argument that children have an innate capacity ...

    Creole speakers, who turned pidgin into a full language, and children who use sign language, both go through similar stages of LA as "normal" children, suggesting too that the human brain actively searches for any form of language. There are, of course, many limitations of the nativist theory.

  2. Describe and discuss the Nativist and Behaviour theories of language acquisition, using examples to ...

    As in Corpus 11 Sophie's mother reinforces the incorrect word for biscuit allowing Sophie to continue to use the word "bissy". The Nativist's approach to language acquisition suggests "language is specific to humans" (Wood. 1997.63) and that language is an innate human feature "that the child somehow has the concepts available before experience with language" (Aitchison.1994.235).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work