• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How well does the development of children's understanding of English grammar support any one of the theories of language acquisition which you have studied?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How well does the development of children's understanding of English grammar support any one of the theories of language acquisition which you have studied? It is my opinion that children's understanding of grammar can be used to support any of the theories of language acquisition, and I also believe that many aspects of the different theories are used when a child acquires language. However, I have decided to use evidence to support the Innateness theory proposed by Noam Chomsky. The innateness theory suggests that a child is born with an innate capacity to learn language; the brain is programmed and ready for language at birth. When a child is expose to speech, principals for structuring and learning language automatically develop. ...read more.

Middle

For example `man kick ball'. Children possess knowledge of this structure from birth and this explains why they can learn language at such an incredible speed. Linguistic universals throughout all languages can also be explained by Chomkys theory. The innateness theory explains why children from all cultures pass through similar stages of language acquisition and development. Evidence (see `Revision Express - English Language AS an A2') suggests that children of a different language base will apparently acquire language at roughly the same. Evidence shows that children begin to use and improve their language skills in their second year whether they are actually `taught' or not. It seems from this that children are using a Language Acquisition Device; as long as they are exposed to language the LAD helps them to use primary linguistic data (input) ...read more.

Conclusion

Children use their Language Acquisition Device in order to use the correct inflections when they form the past tense or pluralise. The innateness theory is also supported by the fact that children use their LAD to get uncommon plurals and past tenses wrong as they are following regular grammatical rules. For instance using the common grammatical rule a child may put `-ed' on the end of a word (`loved' for instance) to form the past tense. However using these same rules provided by the LAD s/he may say `comed' instead of `came'. This shows the innateness theory in action. In conclusion I believe that the Chomsky's innateness theory plays a big part in the language acquisition of children, however I also think that the Cognitive theory and interaction are needed to ensure that the child becomes fluent in the language. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Language: Context, Genre & Frameworks section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Language: Context, Genre & Frameworks essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Investigating how language has changed in children's literature; in relation to interaction between ...

    5 star(s)

    * The field of reference within School Girl Chums is dramatically different to that of the description of "The Doctor" (where generally war and soldier parallels are drawn) and this results in the feeling of a much lower status; all terms and modifiers used are 'soft' and 'light' giving the headmistress a very delicate description e.g.

  2. How do Politicians gain support through language? AQA English coursework

    Each speech was designed to persuade the audience, boost the party's image, and restore faith in the party leader. Each speech was approximately 17 A4 pages long. Key linguistic features were chosen and the speeches were analysed as a whole.

  1. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the argument that children have an innate capacity ...

    Piaget was a psychologist who viewed language acquisition as a case of general human learning. He has not suggested, however, that the development is not innate, but only that there is no specific language unit. Piaget's view was then that the development (i.e.

  2. A one to one interaction with an elderly woman Aunty Emily to try through ...

    I should have tried to relax my facial muscles and have large, dilated pupils to indicate interest in Emily. EYE CONTACT: I felt like I haven't developed a close enough relationship with Emily to achieve the aim of the purpose of the interaction because during the conversation, I maintained a

  1. Describe and discuss the Nativist and Behaviour theories of language acquisition, using examples to ...

    Noam Chomsky a linguist believes that all languages have the same basic grammatical features such as consonants, vowels, syllables, nouns and verbs irrespective of the final language the child will learn. This is known as linguistic universal. Nativist's believe all children are born with a Language Acquisition Device (LAD)

  2. Free essay

    Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the argument that children have an innate capacity ...

    specialised vocal tract which allows the precise articulation of a wide range of vocal sounds. Neuro-science has also identified specific areas of the brain with distinctly linguistic functions, suggesting that humans are biologically set apart from animals, as we are "programmed" to acquire vocabulary, grammar and syntax.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work