• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In Flanders Fields by John McCrae, and Suicide In The Trenches by Siegfried Sassoon, Compare and contrast the different attitudes to war expressed by the poets and the techniques used to convey them."

Extracts from this document...


English Coursework Poetry "Select two of the poems you have studied. Compare and contrast the different attitudes to war expressed by the poets and the techniques used to convey them." The two poems, which I have chosen, are, "In Flanders Fields" by John McCrae, and "Suicide in the Trenches" by Siegfried Sassoon. The poems take opposing views to the war. "In Flanders Fields" we find McCrae taking a positive, almost religious and very sensitive view about the outcome of war. Whilst in comparison, in "Suicide in the Trenches", Sassoon portrays a negative, harsh, cynical and angry view. "In Flanders Fields" McCrae writes about his views on what happens after dying in war. It is a very personal poem, emphasised by being written using the personal pronouns; "we and our", rather than impersonal; "them and their". This involves the reader by in a way, including them in the poem. The poem also imparts a strong feeling of patriotism. McCrae uses controlled, everyday language in the poem. The rhyme is steady, and flows smoothly, which draws you into the poem, and that's what makes me like it. "Between the crosses, row on row" McCrae uses a lot of repetition. He talks of the crosses on the graves, making sure you realise that there are lots of graves, and how the poppies grow in between. ...read more.


Yet he almost invents this with what is almost a threat, contrasting life and death, right and wrong. For example, "If ye break faith with us who die We shall not sleep", I think that McCrae's attitude towards war is brave. He has hope, and thinks that you should fight for your country as your comrades have done before you. Agree with your country, and keep going till it's over. It's a soldier's duty to die for his country. It should be worthwhile. The poem is patriotic, and has a strong sense of purpose, but it's sad, and yet dignified. "Suicide in the Trenches" is a totally different poem. Its verses are simple, they have a strong beat, the lines are rhythmical, and have regular rhyming. The poem was written in 1918, in the First World War, so Sassoon is writing about his experiences. It starts off with the phrase "simple solider", using alliteration. The soldier is young, innocent, too young to be fighting, but it seems a pleasant poem. "Who grinned at life in empty joy, means that the soldier is easily pleased, undemanding, glad with life. When it was dark, and lonesome, the soldier slept through it, happily, he was untroubled, and had nothing to worry about. He got up at the crack of dawn, as the lark does. ...read more.


"Kindling eye" is a way of pointing out their excitement, getting a fire going, that they are lit up with enthusiasm for war, which they wont fight. The people are hiding away from what the soldiers have to do. War is hell. War has taken away all the soldier's youth and laughter goes. There is no laughter in war. The men don't get to live their youth, and have to fight, and kill. The two poems are therefore totally different, but they have the same structure. The both have three stanzas, and have generally got a steady beat throughout. They have opposite meanings. They both start off pleasant, and "Flanders Fields" stays that way, it is sad but with a positive outlook on the way. But Sassoon's "Suicide in the trenches" changes abruptly and becomes very negative. They both talk about death, but in totally opposite ways, "In Flanders Fields" says it is worth dying for your country, and what you believe in. But on the other hand, "Suicide in the Trenches" says it isn't worth going through the hell of war, and losing your life for nothing. They are both very personal poems, even though Sassoon's becomes less personal towards the end. Both the poets have lived through war, and both the poems were written in the same year, during WW1. Both the poems have simple, easy to understand, everyday language. Davina West L5P 4 Poetry Coursework ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Presentation of In Flanders Fields - script

    3 star(s)

    * This abruptness perhaps symbolises the fact that nothing can be done to change this fact, as it is just that: a fact. * 'Dead' is capitalised, as though the poet is referring to all those who died as one collective person.

  2. War poetry - different poets attitudes to war.

    A lot of his poems were about the dreadful conditions of the trenches and in one of his poems about a rat he says:- The darkness crumbles away- It is the same old druid Time as ever. HOW DOES THE CONTENT OF THE POEM MAKE YOU FEEL?

  1. Compare the poems from the First World War "In Flanders Field" by John McCrae, ...

    The dead hand over the torch means that they have completed their duty. It is a mission and they are passing it on to the next generation. The suggestion is that we should feel honoured to pick it up and continue the fight for them.

  2. What attitudes to World War One does Siegfried Sassoon display in his poetry?

    His poetry is written, not only with excellent literary style, but also to warn future generations of the horrors of war, a warning people have ignored repeatedly. He did not glorify the war but was quick to condemn it and reflect on the total waste and loss of life.

  1. Consider the novels ‘Birdsong’ and ‘Regeneration’ compare Faulks’ and Barker’s presentation of life in ...

    It was as simple as that. I had had no friends before and suddenly I found that I had, if not the friendship then at least the company of hundreds of men my age. When I was commissioned Ii found that some of them even looked up to me.

  2. The First World War changed the way that people thought about war and patriotism. ...

    Owen uses the senses to show how the soldiers have almost ceased to function as they are 'deaf' and 'blind' yet they still march on as if they are sleep walking and are now unaware of their surroundings. In the second stanza, the poet generates a sense of panic.

  1. Discuss the importance of In Flanders Fields and its links with the rest of ...

    "In Flanders Fields" is based around death and due to the severity and sensitivity that surrounds this theme it only heightens the depth and meaning of the poem. Not only does McCrae give us the raw, plain information about their deaths, he demands that the readers recognise the dead soldiers'

  2. By What Means Do The Poets in These Five War Poems Convey Their View ...

    not to reply, theirs not to reason why Theirs but to do and die," In the third verse the poet emphasizes the fact that they are trapped by repeating the word cannon to the left to the right and in front of them this works and brings up he idea of despair.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work