• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In Omeros and Till We Have Faces how do the authors explore the idea of love and its effect on people and society?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Madeleine Turner Madeleine Turner Coursework Comparison Texts Word Count: In both Omeros and Till We Have Faces both authors explore the idea of love and its effect on people and society. Lewis and Walcott have both successfully attempted to create links between the different types of love that are present and have many similarities within their use of love as both a savior and hindrance. Both writers draw their novels context from Greek Myth which was renowned for its romantic context but also the burden of love which has a great effect of both writers? novels, however they present them in very different ways as Walcott is using the ?Iliad? as his aid whereas Lewis is focused as a retelling of ?Cupid and Psyche?. Walcott in difference to Lewis has a person agenda when writing Omeros; wanting to give St. Lucia a history whilst using aspects of Homer is something which he has done successfully and won him the Nobel Prize. Lewis however in retelling the myth is able to achieve his own goals and comments on religion, society and his own personal aspects. Within Till We have Faces there is a clear presence of distorted and obsessive love. Orual?s infatuation with Psyche is something which engulfs the reader from the moment that the latter is born. This sister, woman, object even is her every waking minuet. It is clear that Lewis wants to highlight this impulsive and obsessive love when Orual states that ?the world had broken in pieces and Psyche and I were not in the same piece? but separate entities and persons which they had been from the beginning but Orual was too blinded by obsession to notice. ...read more.

Middle

This same love for history could also be said for Lewis in Till We Have Faces; he has chosen to retell a myth and keeps ultimately to the basis of the story, showing his love and appreciation for the history. Although an atheist he still appreciates the ?existence? of the gods and has kept it true to form. Storge or the affectionate love mostly felt for family members is something is a web of complexity within both novels. In Till We Have Faces, this love is evident between Orual and Fox, her helper and somewhat of a guardian she states profoundly that 'I loved the Fox ... more than anyone I had yet known? and precedes to call him ?Grandfather? regardless of the fact that he is a slave of her fathers?. ?The Fox is portrayed lovingly, but his enlightened philosophy has an insufficiency about it? as put forward by Pete Lowman, however I believe that it is not his philosophy which is insufficient but the fact that he is not truly related to Orual and cannot give her the true family ties, similar to Psyche, who as much as Orual wants is not her true sister. Yet still she feels this strong affliction and yearning for them, which would mean that Orual is yearning for a true family life as her father (her only true living relative) has dubbed her ?ugly? and continuously taunts her for it whilst casting her aside. This suggests a lack of Storge on her father?s part and falls into one of the key themes on unrequited love. ...read more.

Conclusion

for the sake of love even if ?the lover who comes to her in the darkness is also part of the madness? it is irrelevant because what she feels is the truest form of agape. This sacrifice is something that Lewis wants the reader to be aware of so to see the purity of Psyche herself. In conclusion both Lewis and Walcott present love in very similar ways. They use it as a key theme with the novel and the epic so to create a depth and personal layer to the characters. It also enables them to comment on societies? view of love or lack of it in some cases and imprint their own personal vendetta into their works. Furthermore they both succeed in creating a layered plot with the different types of love felt between the characters but also the love for the ancient themselves. They have appealed to the modern reader by creating novels which accessible for all to relate too as well as commenting on the times which they are set. Walcott himself has used the device of love to create a link or his country through the different race of people but also the different character situation. Whereas Lewis as achieved the ideal of retelling a myth but placing his own individual aspects within the pages. Lewis has used love as the attraction and destruction of his tale. Both writers use love to have an inherent impact on their novel/epic. Ultimately both authors have shown that love is something that is both universal but also individual and applied it in very different ways but with equal success. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Criticism & Comparison section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Criticism & Comparison essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The English Patient

    5 star(s)

    Kip is touched by the fact that this "true English gentleman" would look past his race and take him under his wing. It becomes evident that Kip feels closer to his English family than to his Indian one. Though he talks sadly about his mentor Lord Suffolk and his premature

  2. Unity of Effect in Cask of Amontillado

    Montresor's family motto insinuates what he is thinking and planning. The motto, "Nemo me impune lacessit" means "No one dare punish me with impunity" (14), which implies that Montresor will not allow anyone to wrong him without being punished for it, nor will he be punished for any actions he takes.

  1. How do the authors of 'The Bell Jar' and 'Surfacing' depict madness?

    By choosing to kill herself, Esther is, in a way, playing God- a stark contrast to the protagonist of 'Surfacing', who instead creates gods. The gods she creates are closely linked with "the power" she so often mentions, which she actively seeks.

  2. Compare and contrast the writers presentation of the consequences of obsessive love in: Othello, ...

    Is Othello annoyed that Desdemona has been unfaithful, and that he would not care if he didn't know? If so, is this love? From lines 460-506 the audience, witness Iago lying about Cassio's dream, immediately without thought he wants to 'tear (Desdemona)

  1. The enticing themes of human desires and dreams in the city acts as a ...

    The idea of Janus brings together the true identities of Joe and Eddie. Janus, a Roman God is created with half of his face in darkness, and the other in light. Darkness could symbolise the greed and desire of which both Joe and Eddie desired; similarly the light could represent the truth and reality of their identities and the city.

  2. Explore the presentation of the individual against society in 'One Flew Over the Cuckoo's ...

    own goals, conning the patients on the ward out of as much money as he can. Despite this, as he grows to understand the patients and the terrible injustice of Nurse Ratched's regime, he eventually grows from a sleazy conman into a messianic force ('Anointest my head with conductant.

  1. Control, submission and rebellion in the novels The Handmaids Tale by Margaret Atwood, Memoirs ...

    His first target was Lewis Prothero, V brutally killed him in his bathroom at BTN but when the news about his death was reported, the news anchor that his death was caused by a ?heart failure? the media?s use of sugar-coating the news constantly is a way to keep the

  2. How is forbidden love conveyed in both Shakespeares Romeo and Juliet and Malorie Blackmans ...

    Since this is the last statement made about Kamal in the novel, it is unclear whether he refuses to comment because he does not care about Callum?s death or whether he refuses because he is guilty and remorseful. From Kamal?s attitude towards Callum throughout the novel, it is likely that he is careless and thoughtless of his death.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work