• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In what sense, if any, can a machine be said to 'know' something? How can anyone believe that a machine can think?

Extracts from this document...


Min Hwang TOK: Period 6 Mr. Cannon September 16, 2003 In what sense, if any, can a machine be said to 'know' something? How can anyone believe that a machine can think? May 1997 marked the monumental achievement of mankind to some, the failure to defend "dignity of humanity"1 to some, or, to others, nothing much at all. In May 1997, the supercomputer "Deep Blue", designed by IBM, defeated Garry Kasparov, the chess champion of the world, in his own game. People believed that this event showed the development increasingly authentic artificial intelligence, and also believed that the development artificial intelligence - even rivaling the intelligence and thought of the human mind, was only a matter of time. This sparked a series of old questions anew - how can a machine be said to have knowledge? How can a machine have thought? A man-made machine can 'think' and 'know', as long as it is able to reproduce the interactions necessary for thought, but its abilities to do so will be limited by the abilities of its creator. ...read more.


The winner of the match becomes somewhat irrelevant, because it was not necessary for "Deep Blue" to show its ability to reason. The event was a display of thought and knowledge by machines, because even though the algorithms in the programming of "Deep Blue" was primitive, it was still an algorithm designed to analyze logically - which is basically what thought is. The fact that "Deep Blue" won only means that its algorithm was one that was relatively complex, even when compared to the human mind. Physically, there is nothing stopping computers such as "Deep Blue" to be eventually designed to rival the human ability to 'think'. The human mind on the microscopic level consists of countless amounts of neurotransmitters that transmit information and commands, with the end product being an extremely complex set of finite ongoing procedures, which we define as sentience, or thought. On an even smaller scale, it is merely a collection of simple particles interacting together, all obeying the same set of laws. If this is true, there is nothing intrinsically different between a machine and the human mind - it is only the sequence in which the particles are arranged that differs. ...read more.


In other words, we are unable to predict human behavior in such a deterministic manner, and therefore, we are unable to truly grasp the algorithms of the human mind. There is no physical impossibility of the creation of a machine that can think and know like a human does, but humans will not be its creator; it will be another, more superior being with a more refined mental ability than humans. "Deep Blue" is a prime example of the ability of a machine to reason. Even though the algorithms of it are simpler than that of humans, and consequently require more brawn2 (a more complex algorithm would be a 'shortcut' to the conclusion), they are nevertheless, in an abstract sense, equivalent to our act of 'thinking'. Since machines can think, however primitively, they are also able to "know", since they would be able to infer logically by analyzing perception (in their case, it is inputted information). 1 Kasparov 2 "Deep Blue" was required to process two hundred million moves per second, in order to reason effectively enough to beat Kasparov. Hwang 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Fyodor Dostoevsky section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Fyodor Dostoevsky essays

  1. Albert Einstein is quoted as having said, "the world is a dangerous place to ...

    But think about it for a bit. If you saw your neighbor starving because they couldn't afford to buy food, what would you do? Would you sit by and let them starve? Or would you do whatever you could to see that they got the food they needed until they were able to provide it again for themselves?

  2. Theory Of Knowledge.

    In addition, both professions are restricted by many boundaries. As usual, these boundaries are unique to each profession. The various limitations and restraints a historian encounters will be the main focus of the essay and as the essay proceeds, we will reach a conclusion that despite the many restrictions, a

  1. How can an audience identify with Charlie Gordon's desire to be 'smart'?

    He is happy when he beats Algernon in the maze, but is also sad for the mouse because he lost, and Charlie knows Algernon must 'feel really bad... after winning all this time.' Charlie has no real idea about friendship.

  2. Why do humans need comic book heroes and villains, ...

    They are the personification of brute force, and these 'monsters' embody the human race's violent natures and collectively aggressive subconsciousness, represented without strictures or morals, a position most boys have wanted to be in at one time or another, to be unstoppable, answerable to no one, and utterly undefeatable.

  1. Data Envelopment Analysis in University Rankings

    This explains why it has an efficiency of 1, and also why 3 other universities have an efficiency of 1 - because they each top the league in a particular criterion. There is therefore no choice but to rank all 4 1st=, though it might be assumed that UCL be

  2. The reason behind the hobby-horse.

    He contends, "Digressions, incontestably, are the sunshine;-----they are the life, the soul of reading;-------take them out of this book for instance,-----you might as well take the book along with them" (52). Through the use of a casual conversational tone, Sterne incorporates the reader into the novel as a participatory figure.

  1. Fire, how was I supposed to know it would lead to this?

    For the next couple of months I had been going around causing carnage burning down old houses to dustbins. The rush was building up; my mind telling me to make a fire and to burn something, at this stage knew something was wrong with my mind but I was so involved in the fires my common sense had faded away.

  2. How does the writer of the play 'A Kind of Alaska' show the struggle ...

    Yet again she is revealing her insecurity. Deborah does not feel comfortable with the help of a person she does not know. This also could be perceived as an issue of pride - she might not want the help from Hornby as she wants to prove to herself that she is capable of moving by herself.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work