Is Macbeth a Hero or a Butcher?

Authors Avatar

Michael Basaldella

10.2   HXR

Is Macbeth a Hero or a Butcher?

‘Macbeth’, one of Shakespeare’s shortest plays though often described as his best, was written in 1606 for the newly crowned King James I of England and VI of Scotland. It tells of a Scottish warrior named Macbeth who killed the King and eventually met his own gruesome end. But is Macbeth really the tragic hero he is made out to be? Does he really deserve to be glorified as a worthy and noble warrior? No. Macbeth was a brutal butcher who slaughtered his own people mercilessly and ruled his country tyrannically. First, let me clarify the definitions of the words ‘hero’ and ‘butcher’ which I will be using. A ‘hero’ is a man who is greatly admired for his exceptional qualities and achievements. A special kind of hero was the ‘tragic hero’. The criteria for a ‘tragic hero’ were set by the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle and can be summed up briefly as a great man high up in society, with a fatal flaw which would eventually lead to his downfall – a man whom the audience will feel sympathy for when he falls. A ‘butcher’, in this context, is someone who kills people cruelly without feeling guilt or remorse – something which Macbeth is a clear example of.

Join now!

Macbeth’s actions at the start of the play are already depicted as barbaric. When the Captain describes the battle between Macbeth and the rebel Macdonwald, he claims that Macbeth split Macdonwald open “from the nave to the chops.” This is clearly a gruesome way of killing someone. While a Jacobean audience may not have found this too revolting, a modern audience would certainly find Macbeth’s actions unacceptable. What kind of hero slices his victims in half?

In I.ii, when Macbeth was given the title of Thane of Cawdor, he remembers when the witches told him that he “shalt ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

This essay highlights the dangers of making a judgement before properly considering the evidence. The argument is quite powerfully presented but none of the complexities are acknowledged and the conclusion is only persuasive if all of Macbeth's soliloquies are ignored, as they are here. Similarly, the possible supernatural influence of the witches should be more fully considered.