• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Macbeth as a fallen hero. Two paths lay in front of Macbeth, two choices, and inevitably Macbeth chose the path of power and immorality.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Evil. Immoral. Good. These are words which with we use to define people, define their actions, their purpose and inevitably decide how we react to them. As we view Shakespeare's tragedy Macbeth, the principal character Macbeth, is witnessed as a hero, an extraordinary soldier, someone who is honourable, valorous and someone who we might define and picture as good. As the nature of this portrayal changes, relative to his ambition, one sees the notion that corrupting power is the result. A result that leads to a pinnacle, a point in which one's achievements are no longer satisfying, pleasing, and yet one is still forced to maintain that position, carry that burden simply because one cannot go back down, just as one cannot change one's past. And it is at this point that one sympathizes with the character, the person who made his choices, who we considered evil, immoral, despicable, yet we still see as someone moral and most importantly good, who just took the incorrect path and cannot go back. Macbeth was an honourable man, a man who felt emotions such as love. Love for his wife, his kingdom and truly his king whom he was considered "his kinsman", "his subject". ...read more.

Middle

That he was not strong enough to stand up to the forceful drive and temptation of his ambition by his wife, and the prophecies. And that he will feel the remorse, the guilt, and regret forever. He is trapped along a fate that he can no longer change. A fate in which he chose, yet didn't choose. For he had begun the ascension up the pinnacle, the beginning of a journey, in which he would be forced to lie or murder to continue up, to save himself from an inescapable end in which it could only lead him to a point, a point of no return. That the bond of loyalty to the king was broken already, just as he cancelled and tore "to pieces that great bond" which kept him pale. (III.ii.49-50) That he ended all religious attachments, his belief of Christianity, for power, power which he could not control, by killing his own king, 'his host'. Macbeth was a mortal, someone who knew his mistake, that his hidden ambition had been released. That if he "Had...but died an hour before this chance,/" he would of "lived a blessed time"(II.iii 87-88). That he was condemned, doomed when he struck that fatal blow on King Duncan. ...read more.

Conclusion

That the root cause, his ambition, his will to believe in falseness lies, and his cowardness to negate it led to his change in his morals, into unrest and immorality. And that all of it led him to a point, a peak where he spent all the effort to attain something that he did not deserve, just as a "a giant's robe upon a dwarfish thief", and that eventually one's strength to uphold that great weight cannot last, even if you are a god. (V.II. 21-22) And it is here that we sympathize with Macbeth, a man who killed people, murdered them with or without intent, yet was led down this idea, this path simply by one wrong choice which led to another just as a butterfly flies from one flower to another. He was a villain, he was immoral, but that in itself is mankind's faults, which we all understand, that we all make mistakes, that we are led down paths in which we chose not too, and that Macbeth just went down a path which had no end. For it was this prominent downfall which without a doubt showed us that if someone recognized as a hero, a god can be deduced to such evil deeds, we can only sympathize with him, see ourselves as more vunerable, easier to manipulate, and just like himself. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Macbeth section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Macbeth essays

  1. 'This tyrant, whose sole name blisters our tongues, Was once thought honest.' Macbeth IV. ...

    Whereas, other characters in the play view him as a tyrant, it is possible for the audience to sympathise with him as they know he is following fate and is driven by forces beyond his control. Initially, in spite of being ambitious, it is clear that he is not easily

  2. By considering the soliloquies, analyse how Macbeth's character changes as the play progresses.

    his bravery, there is a definite similarity to these qualities and how Macbeth himself was described at the outset of the play. Here we can see how Macbeth has changed because he now has a very high view of himself, even though he is now a murdering tyrant.

  1. How Far do You Think it is True to Say that Macbeth is a ...

    She has turned him 180o to do the bloody deed he was convinced he would not. This persuasion and manipulation was made possible by his own weakness, stemming from his love of his wife, which proved too much for him to master.

  2. “Macbeth is essentially a study in the power of the supernatural.” Discuss

    Everything had its own place. Accepting your place in the chain was a duty rewarded by God but if you disrupt the chain, as the witches are planning for Macbeth to do, it lead to chaos. The next time we see the witches is when they are meeting with Macbeth

  1. Macbeth was led down to an inescapable road of doom by an outside force, ...

    He also want the audience to think she evil in the ways she persuades Macbeth in to murdering. This two points, as a sharp contrast of each other and this is what give it the powerful effect of evil. For Macbeth.

  2. The tragic hero and the tragic

    TRAGIC CONFLICT: EXTERNAL * Usually there are two persons, of whom the hero is one---OR, * Two Parties or Groups, one of which the hero leads---OR, * The passions, tendencies, ideas, principles, forces which animate these persons or groups. In Richard II, for example, we have the King on one side and Henry Bollinbroke on the other.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work