• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Many definitions of tragedy claim that at the end of the play positives have emerged. Is it possible to see anything positive in the ending of King Lear?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Many definitions of tragedy claim that at the end of the play positives have emerged. Is it possible to see anything positive in the ending of King Lear? It is difficult to see any positives in the ending of King Lear. Shakespeare's other tragic works such as Macbeth, Othello and Hamlet, all have some sense of hope and renewal as order is restored however, King Lear opposes these traditions by avoiding an optimistic ending. This bleakness that is carried throughout the entire play, from Lear's disastrous actions in Act 1 Scene 1 to the climactic catastrophe in Act 5 Scene 3, has earned King Lear many criticisms over the years from such people as Nahum Tate, Samuel Johnson and A.C. Bradley who all believed that the play was too tragic to be satisfactory. In the end of King Lear there are few positives to take, so few so that even the characters begin to articulate the bleak sense of realisation, Kent in the final scene questions "Is this the promised end?" (V.iii.262). There are however many positive points exhibited throughout the play that in their own way give hope for the future. First of all, in the first scene Cordelia demonstrates hope through her actions. She refuses to participate in her father's egotistical 'love trial' by simply saying "Nothing"(I.i.88). Cordelia is portrayed as a symbol of hope in Act 4 Scene 4 where she is attempting to help her father despite the fact that Lear banished her. ...read more.

Middle

The heath which would be a natural place for disorder helps reform corrupted characters such as Lear. This constant reversal of order through the use of imagery help build up the misery and tension which manifests itself in the last scene to ultimately show there is no hope. This leads on to the next point that the form of the play helps destroy the hope at the end. The play is set out in the form of a Senecan tragedy; these tragedies show a lot of revenge and blood thirst, and this play follows that traditional sense although the ending is not traditional and continues in this revengeful manor and as Samuel Johnson said "There is no scene which does not add to the aggravation of distress."1 The ending of King Lear has many criticized many a time throughout its history primarily for its bleak ending. The plays final scene was considered to be so bleak that Nahum Tate rewrote the ending in the form of The History of King Lear (1681). This alternative play changed the ending to see Cordelia and Edgar married and allowing Lear to survive. The original was so widely believed to be too hopeless that Tate's version was the performed version for nearly 2 centuries until Samuel Phelps, who performed both versions, helped reinstated the original. Another critic of Shakespeare's work is A.C. ...read more.

Conclusion

The True Chronicle of the History of the Life and Death of King Lear and His Three Daughters which was first performed in 1608. The fact that the play was originally intended to be a history clearly shows that the reason as to why there are few positives to take away compared to a traditional Shakespearean tragedy allows the play to follow its own pattern meaning it should be safe from criticisms of the end. To conclude the final Act of King Lear may be widely considered negative but I disagree with this belief as there some moral positives that can be taken away. One of the primary lessons that can be learnt is that one should not be deceived by appearances and should look further than just appearances. This is a theme that is heavily featured throughout and this blindness and egotistical nature of Lear is the birth of all the play's chaos. Also this theme is featured in the last lines when Edgar says "Speak what we feel, not what we ought to say." (V.iii.324) Additionally the play shows us that honesty shall prevail and dishonesty shall fail, this point is shown as the characters that have been the villains all finish the play dead. Despite this, one negative aspect, the play does show us that occasionally the innocent do suffer, for example Cordelia, but even this negativity has a positive side as this suffering lets the ignorant characters such as Lear finally see their way. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level King Lear section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level King Lear essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How effectively does Shakespeare present Lear's loss of power in the play?

    4 star(s)

    Again his "hundred knights" are emphasised when she questions whether it is a good idea to let him keep them. Finally Gonerill and Regan reduce his knights from a hundred to none, prompting Lear to realise his folly and the cruel ways of his daughters.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    King Lear. The seeds of tragedy are sewn in Act 1 scene 1. To ...

    3 star(s)

    Critic, Plato proposed that 'nothing' is another word to describe chaos [3]. This illustrates the destruction his kingdom is to be plunged into, suggesting the inevitability of tragic events. Arguably Act 3 provides readers with a better indication of the tragic events that are to follow.

  1. Explore the presentation of Edmund in 'King Lear'

    The action of this play is generated by the evil characters. The audience could get the impression from the stage of a world full of active, alive evil whereas 'good' mean suffering and is passive. Evil can be attractive, as in the character of Edmund; his frankness to himself as

  2. How does Shakespeare present Edmund in King Lear?

    After experiencing this himself Edmund wants to assume leadership in order to drive Britain away from social divide. Although throughout the play the audience simply perceives Edmund as a malicious menace we must look at his vindication. Edmund is simply trying to restore Britain's power even if it comes at the cost of his family and Goneril and Regan.

  1. With particular reference to Act 1, Scene 1, show how Shakespeare presents the character ...

    She also says that she does not love anyone except Lear, despite the fact that she has a husband. All of this, it seems, has earned Regan a large portion of Lear's land, which is exactly equal in size as her sister, Goneril's.

  2. To What Extent Can King Lear Be Described as the Tragic Hero of Shakespeares ...

    Wherefore Should I sit here? This act persuades me That this remotion of the duke and her Is practice only.' Throughout this speech in your mind's eye you can imagine him pacing back and for the, gesticulating wildly, arguing with him self.

  1. King Lear is a play dominated by the contrast between wisdom and foolishness. In ...

    The madness of the Fool and Edgar might be intended to provide comic relief, as the Fool?s jests often lighten the tone and some Edgar?s antics as Poor Tom can seem rather amusing. However, this also provides irony, as their madness is an intentional fake madness, where Lear?s in not.

  2. The Nature of Redemption and the Limits of Pessimism in King Lear

    Because there has been such a thorough and meticulous extermination of evil by the end of the play, Bradley is convinced that the world is metaphysically inclined towards goodness. He therefore serves as the evangelist of Leibniz?s happy sophism regarding the ?best of all possible worlds,? and is confident that

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work