• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

 Comparisons and differences between, Lawrence Olivier and Kenneth Branagh in their films of Shakespeare’s Henry V.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Comparisons and differences between, Lawrence Olivier and Kenneth Branagh in their films of Shakespeare's Henry V. 1945 1989 Henry V was written as a play during a time of patriotism within England and England's plans of territorial and economic expansion were coming to light. The play was a great morale booster to the people as they prepared for the up and coming years, many of the scenes show the St Georges flag flying high and hopeful. It showed war's glory and hopes but at the same time put across the dedication and commitment that went into winning great battles such as the one at Agincourt. Lawrence Olivier directed his film in 1940's, the war years as they are often referred to. The labour party were in power at the time they were elected in the election July elections. These troubled times in England caused wide spread depression and films such as this were mainly produced as moral boosters and with war in its ending days they retold the miraculous story involving one of Britain's most hard fought and triumphant victories. ...read more.

Middle

Henry marries the Princess and has France as English territory. Lawrence's battle scene lasts 16 minutes. This is a long period in screen time, the way Olivier has decided to set his scene put is to be as patriotic as possible the target audience being war veterans or young army cadets it is almost like an advertisement or a piece of propaganda showing the people how they can help Britain in its battles. It also shows it also shows how hard people fought for their country but I believe that this isn't the main purpose of the film. In 1945 films were becoming more popular people often spent their rations on the theatre and a film like this must have bought great happiness to a time of dismay. Films like these are often called period pieces they retell a story from a particular period. The story had started out as a stage play but the with the ever more improvements in technology film had become the next phase in entertainment as DVDs have become now. ...read more.

Conclusion

is playing the part of King Henry V. Olivier makes it completely obvious about which character is which. Even the horses are wearing shiny armour and in battle you can tell which side each horse belongs to, the French horses are black and the English horses are white, white representing purity and holiness. Branagh is not wearing such dazzling costumes but more subtle and easier to fight in Branagh does fight a lot in his version. Both pieces were carefully constructed suitable to there period in time Olivier's was a piece of propaganda for the second world war and boosted moral in the 1940's. Branagh's piece was also propaganda but Branagh had more technology available to him and so he was able to use special effects such as slow motion. Branagh's piece also had more music in it also had the Non Nobis song in at the end much more patriotism. Overall both pieces did what they were suppose to do but my favourite is Branagh's piece because he show a true hard fought battle with more gore so it is much more realistic. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Henry V section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Henry V essays

  1. Comparison of Olivier (1944) and Branagh's (1989) screen adaptations of Henry V

    "A Little Touch of Harry in the Night" (thematically) comprises of the night meetings of the disguised king with the various men in his army - each type representative of different factions and classes. The king's first encounter is with the bombast Pistol who provides for humour (to help lighten the rather brooding and reflective scene).

  2. What are the functions of the Chorus in Shakespeare's Henry V?

    However, this isn't a bad thing. It is an example of a hyperbole, where the chorus exaggerates the action so the audience become more emotional. In this case, by making the battles seem like such a dangerous and difficult task for Henry and his tiny army, the audience are sympathetic and feel more patriotic.

  1. In the tradition of aesthetics, Oscar Wilde said, “There is no such thing as ...

    "I have no doubt that it was not an accident, Dorian, though it must be put in that way to the public..."

  2. The Subplot: Consider the significance of the subplot and examine Shakespeare's dramatic use of ...

    life so lifeless as it shows itself" The confidence of the French is massively over established and their irony contrasts with the English feelings about the battle. This is also contrasted with the English as they are rallied together by a speech made by Henry.

  1. Does Shakespeare successfully present Henry V as a hero to his audience?

    Pistol: "the king's a bawock and a heart of gold, a lad of life, an imp of fame, of parents good, of fist most valiant." Later on in an argument (while in disguise) with Bates Henry stresses, "...I think the king is but a man as I am.

  2. How Successfully Does Shakespeare Present To An Audience Henry As The 'Ideal King'

    arrested and simply hung as Henry tells Exeter in the play: "Touching our person seek we no revenge, But we our kingdom's safety must tender, Whose ruin you have sought, that to her laws We do deliver you. Get you therefore hence, Poor miserable wretches, to your death, The taste

  1. It is easy to see how Henry V can be seen as an inspirational ...

    This, for me, was the most interesting part of this passage. That is because it is something that everybody in the audience would have been able to relate to. Not everybody would have understood what it was like to be in war, but everyone would have understood what it was like to have a mom.

  2. Media Comparative Essay: Concerning the 2 well known film versions of Shakespeare's Henry V ...

    Branagh's film was constructed many years after Olivier's predominant original - when it was considered a classic. Olivier totally advanced Shakespearean film and gave dawn to colour filming. A young Branagh would have to direct and act admirably to stand alongside the preceding version.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work