• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

 Comparisons and differences between, Lawrence Olivier and Kenneth Branagh in their films of Shakespeare’s Henry V.

Extracts from this document...


Comparisons and differences between, Lawrence Olivier and Kenneth Branagh in their films of Shakespeare's Henry V. 1945 1989 Henry V was written as a play during a time of patriotism within England and England's plans of territorial and economic expansion were coming to light. The play was a great morale booster to the people as they prepared for the up and coming years, many of the scenes show the St Georges flag flying high and hopeful. It showed war's glory and hopes but at the same time put across the dedication and commitment that went into winning great battles such as the one at Agincourt. Lawrence Olivier directed his film in 1940's, the war years as they are often referred to. The labour party were in power at the time they were elected in the election July elections. These troubled times in England caused wide spread depression and films such as this were mainly produced as moral boosters and with war in its ending days they retold the miraculous story involving one of Britain's most hard fought and triumphant victories. ...read more.


Henry marries the Princess and has France as English territory. Lawrence's battle scene lasts 16 minutes. This is a long period in screen time, the way Olivier has decided to set his scene put is to be as patriotic as possible the target audience being war veterans or young army cadets it is almost like an advertisement or a piece of propaganda showing the people how they can help Britain in its battles. It also shows it also shows how hard people fought for their country but I believe that this isn't the main purpose of the film. In 1945 films were becoming more popular people often spent their rations on the theatre and a film like this must have bought great happiness to a time of dismay. Films like these are often called period pieces they retell a story from a particular period. The story had started out as a stage play but the with the ever more improvements in technology film had become the next phase in entertainment as DVDs have become now. ...read more.


is playing the part of King Henry V. Olivier makes it completely obvious about which character is which. Even the horses are wearing shiny armour and in battle you can tell which side each horse belongs to, the French horses are black and the English horses are white, white representing purity and holiness. Branagh is not wearing such dazzling costumes but more subtle and easier to fight in Branagh does fight a lot in his version. Both pieces were carefully constructed suitable to there period in time Olivier's was a piece of propaganda for the second world war and boosted moral in the 1940's. Branagh's piece was also propaganda but Branagh had more technology available to him and so he was able to use special effects such as slow motion. Branagh's piece also had more music in it also had the Non Nobis song in at the end much more patriotism. Overall both pieces did what they were suppose to do but my favourite is Branagh's piece because he show a true hard fought battle with more gore so it is much more realistic. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Henry V section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Henry V essays

  1. Comparison of Olivier (1944) and Branagh's (1989) screen adaptations of Henry V

    "A Little Touch of Harry in the Night" (thematically) comprises of the night meetings of the disguised king with the various men in his army - each type representative of different factions and classes. The king's first encounter is with the bombast Pistol who provides for humour (to help lighten the rather brooding and reflective scene).

  2. Media Comparative Essay: Concerning the 2 well known film versions of Shakespeare's Henry V ...

    Still there is an obvious (yet often subtle) extent to which Branagh tries to differ his scenes. Both versions densely pack broadly filmic effects, which offer interesting contrast and similarity. Conclusively it is only important to consider why such differences and resemblances would be made between the two and ultimately the overall of success in each.

  1. Shakespeare's Henry V: More Pageant than Play?

    There were also things that Shakespeare completely left out which would support the idea that Henry V is more of a pageant than a play: In reality the town of Harfleur and its citizens suffered very badly at the hands of Henry's army but in Shakespeare's Henry V the peaceful surrender of the town reflects well on Henry's leadership qualities.

  2. Explore how Shakespeare creates humour for the audience in the scenes in which the ...

    The final scene is in a traditional manor set outdoors, however unlike usual conventions, it is not anywhere abroad such as Athens, but closer to home, bringing a totally different feel for the audience. The start of the scene begins with a soliloquy for Falstaff, who even after the tricks

  1. Henry V - differences between young and old.

    Bolingbroke is also a thief; instead of robbing purses from travellers, he has stolen an entire empire from Richard II, whom he also had murdered. In their ways of dealing with people, especially under uncomfortable circumstances, the two also behave in similar ways.

  2. It is easy to see how Henry V can be seen as an inspirational ...

    Give that a second to sink in. A yeoman is someone who is a small prosperous farmer, a minor landowner, or a bodyguard of the British monarch. Now think about the people who would have been in the audience. You would have had small farmers, minor landowners, and the wealthy.

  1. In the tradition of aesthetics, Oscar Wilde said, “There is no such thing as ...

    "I have no doubt that it was not an accident, Dorian, though it must be put in that way to the public..."

  2. The Subplot: Consider the significance of the subplot and examine Shakespeare's dramatic use of ...

    life so lifeless as it shows itself" The confidence of the French is massively over established and their irony contrasts with the English feelings about the battle. This is also contrasted with the English as they are rallied together by a speech made by Henry.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work