• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

New technologies and their effect on the stalemate on the Western Front.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

New technologies and their effect on the stalemate on the Western Front. A stalemate had developed between the armies of the Central Powers and the Allies. This stalemate lasted for almost four years, taking millions of lives. But in 1918, for whatever reason, the stalemate ended after both armies made effective attacks on the other's trenches. World War One was the testing arena for a number of new weapons. Some had been designed and made before the war, but not yet tested in combat conditions. Others were developed during the war. A number were to become fundamental to success in future wars. The plane, for example, was designed at the turn of the century and made its combat debut in world war one. The tank had not got beyond the drawing board before the war. Other weapons also saw their first use during World War One. Did the new weapons used contribute towards the ending of the stalemate? One of these new weapons was the aeroplane. It had shocked the world when it appeared in 1901. Its first use was reconnaissance. They observed the opposition's troop movements and artillery positions and photographed possible weak areas of defence, which could be exploited. However the first planes of that time were, extremely flimsy and made of piano wires and the pilot was completely exposed to the elements around him. Some could be lifted by a couple of people and most would fall apart if put under pressure or extreme G forces. ...read more.

Middle

Gas was by far the worst weapon of the war. However, since it remained active for a reasonable amount of time, it could not really break the stalemate, as soldiers would not want to advance into trenches, which were contaminated with their own gas. It was also used ineffectively on a number of occasions when the gas was blown back to where it had come from by the wind. Consequently the stalemate was not broken by use of gas, as it could not be effectually followed up, although many men were killed. The tank was a weapon developed by the British and the French to end the stalemate. The idea was that an armored tracked vehicle, would provide protection to troops from machines gun fire, Colonel's Ernest Swinton and Maurice Hankey, became convinced that this vehicle that could play an important role in the war. At the outbreak of the war, Colonel Swinton was sent to the Western Front to write reports on the war. He watched early battles of the war, noticing that machine-gunners were able to kill almost all enemy infantrymen who attacked. He wrote that a "petrol tractors on the caterpillar principle and armoured with hardened steel plates" would be able to neutralize the threat of machine-gunner Constructed in great secrecy, the machine was coded named 'tank' by Swinton. Overall the first prototype, nicknamed 'Little Willie' had a disappointing performance. Nonetheless Colonel Ernest Swinton remained convinced that when modified, the tank would enable the Allies to defeat the Central Powers. ...read more.

Conclusion

It was also modified so that a rifle could fire it. The rifle was loaded with a grenade and a blank. Then on firing, gas, which was released from the cartridge, would send the grenade over 600 feet. Grenades were a development of a 16th century idea, and both sides had them, thus grenades would not have drastically affected the stalemate. It is clear, from the available evidence that new weapons used in World War One, did contribute to both the eventual ending and the prolongation of the stalemate. Historians argue whether the tank was a contributing factor, but in terms of morale, the tank certainly was a success. The allies developed them first, and as a result had numerical and technological superiority. They did break the German defences and make significant gains. The plane was also an indirect cause of a breaking of the stalemate as photos of weak defence were spotted and then exploited. As planes became more sophisticated and heavier loads were carried, the plane became more of an offensive weapon but other aircraft were solely designed for shooting others down. When the tank and the plane were combined with infantry, (at Amiens for example) territorial gains were made, and not lost again. The use of gas did not break the stalemate, although it killed large quantities of soldiers. The modern heavy-artillery was used both defensively and offensively and only sustained the stalemate. Similarly machine-guns worked better as defensive weapons, as they were essentially 'fixed' guns and not therefore effective offensive weapons. The new weapons when used offensively with suitable tactics could effectively break the stalemate. Laurence Oglesby 10M5 07/05/07 Page 1 of 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. In the wars, Robert Rose is a very significant character.

    He was a French man who was angry that Robert was English. HORSE page seventy-three The horse is used as transportation here. HORSES page seventy-four The horse is used as transportation here. HORSES page seventy-five The horse is used as transportation here.

  2. How Was The Stalemate Finally Broken?From Christmas 1914 until March 1918 there had been ...

    The German Offensive By 1918 the German conditions were desperate. The British blockade was starving Germany of raw materials and all of Germany of food. The Germans knew they had to do something to break the stalemate soon. The surrender of Russia gave them a good opportunity.

  1. I need to produce a marketing strategy for a new or existing product. I ...

    They work hard to understand their customers' needs and respond to them. This is rightly the focus of much activity within all parts of their business and fundamental to their success today and into the future. As a leading supplier of essential services, Centrica looks after customers in and around their homes, through a wide range of services.

  2. Technology - Did it break the stalemate or didn't it?

    This creation saw soldiers being protected from machine-guns and allowed troops move further on in 'No Mans Land'. The Machine Gun The Machine Gun has claimed the most lives in World War One although this is only on hospital counts so the actual amount of people killed is not certain.

  1. The Battle of the Somme 1916

    Haig should have thought for himself. Perhaps he wasn't imaginative enough and just selected the most obvious plan suggested by Rawlinson. They both depended way too much on the artillery. Although it may seem plausible that a week long artillery bombardment would destroy everything in it's path, the results suggest that they had not tested it out much.

  2. In 1915 a British newspaper printed a letter from a

    At that time it seemed impossible that anyone could survive long. It seemed to be courting disaster to entertain any hope of anything. The morale of the army had settled onto a rock-bottom of fatalistic despair, in which the

  1. The First World War - The Stalemate on the Western Front - Source based ...

    Question 2: To look at whether the Generals were to blame for failing to break through the western front, we have to realize that there are other reasons such as the weather conditions and the amount of supplies available as it was the first properly industrialized war.

  2. "Poems and stories; official accounts. Which of these give a more accurate picture of ...

    The fact he did this tells us that what he saw must have been very shocking; therefore the terrible scene he has painted is more reliable. This is important when assessing the sources accuracy, because if he abandoned his mission, then what he had seen was certainly very shocking, so the picture must be reasonable accurate.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work