• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Regan is no less a sympathetic character than Cordelia" In light of this view, analyse this comment taking into account dramatic effect.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Regan is no less a sympathetic character than Cordelia. Despite the immediate clearness of the plot of King Lear, it would be untrue to classify Regan and Cordelia as two characters two dimensional or singularly driven; categorizing Cordelia ?benevolent? and Regan as ?malevolent? is an interpretation too simple for characters so complex. Indeed, although Cordelia is portrayed as the restorational character and Regan as a destructive one, the proper characteristics, aims and nature of the characters must be explored in order to properly evaluate the degree to which they appear sympathetic. Arguably, although responsible for the actions that they carry out, it would perhaps be most accurate to say that they are victims of their own father, and that their doings and fate throughout the play are potentially unavoidable products of the circumstances they find themselves in due to their treatment by Lear. It is in the opening scene of the play that the characters of Regan and Cordelia are defined. Upon Lear?s arbitrary, egotistical and wholly unnecessary ?love test?, Regan produces a speech of artificial eloquence and superficiality- ?I am alone felicitate in your dear highnesses? love?. Amongst the deceitfulness of Regan, there is however an underlying reason as to why she must feel the need for the expression of such superficiality. ...read more.

Middle

Indeed, the reticence of Cordelia is an embodiment of the prototypical ?Shakespearean woman?: absent, silent, or dead. A pamphlet in the year 1558 entitled First Blast of the Trumpet against The Monstrous Regiment of Women argued that giving women any sort of authority was the ?subversion of good order?. Cordelia?s decision to break the mould of the dominated, abiding and meek Victorian woman can thus place her in a negative light, and as feminist critic Kathleen McLuskie states, audience sympathy is manipulated to evoke compassion for Lear. Shakespearean gender relations and familial circumstances are not the sole reason for the creation of familial discord of the play. Cordelia?s stand against hypocrisy and the egotism of Lear can be seen as commendable; however perhaps an inherent flaw is present in the character of Cordelia that contributes to family conflict in the play. Her stubborn, principled nature can by non-feminist critics be seen as a key contributor to disharmony in the play. Indeed, it is during the love-test that a number of contradictions about the character of Cordelia arise. She insists that she cannot express herself adequately- or ?heave her heart into her mouth?, yet later in the play she is able to speak against her sisters with perfect eloquence. ...read more.

Conclusion

The fact that, from this equivalent social position, they take different choices and paths is a reflection not of the social situation that they find themselves in, but of their individual disposition. It is from these choices of ?free-will? that the audience categorizes the two daughters- Cordelia as restorative and Regan as shockingly maleficent. It is undeniable that, given her status as ?evil? in the play, Regan at first appears less sympathetic than Cordelia. However, the portrayal of Regan and Cordelia runs deeper than mere appearance and status in the restoration of Lear?s authority. It is, in fact, the simple classification of characters as ?good? or ?bad? in relation to their position to Lear this is central to how the personalities of Regan and Cordelia are evaluated. As McLuskie notes, the play is patriarchal, and focuses centrally and explicitly on the power and fate of Lear. Due to this concentration of the plot on Lear, the audience inevitably feel compassion for him, and thus make a clear differentiation between the ?bad-? and ?goodness? of Regan and Cordelia. For, when viewing the play not from the perspective of a monarch but from a woman enduring social and parental oppression and favouritism, whilst not validating the actions and nature of Regan, a sense of understanding and sympathy is certainly allowed for. Thomas Smith ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level King Lear section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level King Lear essays

  1. With particular reference to Act 1, Scene 1, show how Shakespeare presents the character ...

    This animal imagery is, perhaps, Shakespeare's way of conveying to the audience how Lear is feeling about himself throughout the play; I think this is an effective technique, which also helps me to distinguish whether Lear regards him self as a blind floor, a tragic father or neither.

  2. How does Shakespeare present Edmund in King Lear?

    However one could interpret it as he is simply following his own rules. Later in the play however Edmund starts deviating from his initial 10 syllable per line rule. Shakespeare uses this hypersyballic effect perhaps to emphasise the deterioration of Edmund.

  1. Explore the presentation of Edmund in 'King Lear'

    Ideas are spurned as he proclaims his doctrine of the end justifying the means: 'All with me's meet that I can fashion fit'. Here is a man indubitably evil, ruthlessly selfish and deceitful. We next see Edmund in Act II scene I, when it is night at Gloucester's castle.

  2. Explore the ways in which Shakespeare presents the characters of Goneril, Regan and Cordelia ...

    tells her father "since what I well intend, I do't before I speak". Once again through what Cordelia says the audience is led to distrust the nature of her sisters' declarations " If for I want that glib and oily art, to speak and purpose not."

  1. Social injustices in King Lear

    his character, it is therefore unfair to judge him as he simply wants justice which does not make him evil on a causer of tragedy. His obvious obsession with being bastard catalyses his frustration with society as Harold Bloom (1)

  2. "How does Shakespeare illuminate and develop character in the opening scenes of King Lear?"

    He states that the natural world affects human beings and the way they behave towards each other. This shows the development of Gloucester's character with age and experience, and shows that he is not hasty in his decisions, unlike Lear.

  1. Explore the ways in which Shakespeare presents the characters Goneril Regan and Cordilia in ...

    Cordilia in an aside says 'then poor Cordilia! And yet not so since, I am sure my love is more ponderous than my tongue'. Evidently she truly loves her father greater than her ability to talk about it. We see Shakespeare's development of a true honest character in the way he presents Cordilia.

  2. An Examination of the Significance of the Fool in King Lear

    The Fool's apparent foolish remarks have a deep sense that exhibits his great insight into events when Lear warns him not to talk in this irresponsible manner and threatens to whip him, the Fool replies that a man who

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work