Selfhood in Coleridge

Authors Avatar

                

In the poems Despair and The Suicide's Argument  by Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Coleridge explores the relationship between the 'self' and factors influential in defining identity such as an authoritative power, possibly a divine entity, and the inexorability of the human condition.  In both poems, ideas of selfhood are intimately bound up with notions of existential angst often synonymous with Romanticism, providing the platform  in which Coleridge explores the construction of the 'self'.  This essay will aim to examine the poetic means by which Coleridge explores ideas of selfhood in both poems and also to trace the similarities and differences in this representation in the respective poems.

Inherent within the poems Despair and The Suicide's Argument, Coleridge depicts the poetic voice in a state of profound despair resulting from existential angst; the 'self' seems confused in the friction between the poetic voice's idea of the 'self' as an independent entity and a form of higher authority or moral obligation that undercuts both poems.  

In  The Suicide's Argument, Coleridge depicts the persona's state of discontentment with life through the unusual syntax explicit in the opening line: 'Ere the birth of my life'.  The poet creates the sense of literally distancing 'life' and 'birth', almost as a means of disengaging 'life' from the subject.  It could be argued that the polarisation of the persona's 'life' and the 'self' not only depicts the depressed state of the poetic voice, but also emphasises the persona's idealised notion of an independent 'self' removed from all forms of imposed authority and responsible for its own existence.  

Join now!

This dichotomy between individualism and greater authority is dramatised through the form of the poem: Coleridge structures the poem as an 'argument' between the poetic voice, representing idealised individualism and independence of the 'self', and 'nature', the symbol of authoritative control, perhaps taking weight to deistic significance.  The pathetic fallacy of 'nature' further emphasises the notion of 'nature' as an authoritative entity, possibly representing the divine, as opposed to being subject to the control of humanity:  'Think first, what you ARE!  Call to mind what you WERE! | I gave you innocence, I gave you hope, | Gave health, ...

This is a preview of the whole essay