• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Shakespeare - How do the Falstaff scenes relate to the main plot?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Falstaff is a fat witty knight who is the main source of comedy in play. He is one of the most wonderful and popular characters ever created by Shakespeare. Falstaff is not so much a person to be judged by realistic standards. Part comic fool and part vice figure from the morality plays, his role embodies a vast number of qualities that it is impossible to characterise him in simple terms. Here are four points that sum his character: * Falstaff is the play's fool, yet he shows great virtue with his language. He turns words inside out, deliberately mistakes what people have said to him. He boasts and lies without shame ' a hundred upon poor four of us' is how he describes the counter robbery at Gads Hill. He moralises on the serious themes of the play, honour being a 'mere scutcheon'. * Falstaff is Hal's best friend and at time treats him with almost parental tenderness, at one stage playacting King Henry 'Shall the son of England prove a thief, and take purses'. Hal feels the same way, but is aware of Falstaff's weakness, his potential to 'mislead' him. * Falstaff's speeches are often partly aimed at the audience, inviting it to join in with his hilarious dishonesty, and his jokes and his excuses are comparable to a stand up comedian. ...read more.

Middle

They joke and make fun of each other with out the other taking any offence. But despite all this, Hal knows that to have any credit as a future King he must throw off 'this loose behaviour' so that people will admire him. The major scene when Falstaff and Hal show their father-son relationship is Act II Scene 4, where they play-act the meeting between Hal and King Henry. Mock interview demonstrates two ways of looking at Falstaff, one bad and one good, and these both expressed in language that is highly literary and rhetorical. Falstaff begins by parodying a style of verse- 'King Cambyses vein'-which was common in Elizabethan theatre. You can see that the characteristics of his speech when he turns to prose, the similes, repetitions, rhetorical questions, verbal antithesis and alliterations. These produce an exaggerated, pompous effect suitable for his parody role as the King. Falstaff reference to 'a dagger of lath' identifies him with the figure of Vice in the morality plays whose function was to tempt men to sin. Prince Hal's depiction of Falstaff as 'that reverend vice, that grey iniquity, that father ruffian, that vanity in years' refers to him as a character in the morality plays. ...read more.

Conclusion

Many people would say that Falstaff is a fool in his character. I would strongly disagree with that as he shows great amounts of virtuosity with his words and moralises the words around the main themes of the play (such as honour being a' mere scutcheon' and nothing but 'air'). Falstaff believes that whoever takes honour seriously; honour will take him to death. 'Rare words! Brave world!' he comments, after Hal summons them all to battle. Shakespeare creates a relationship between the two plots, with the comic sub-plot often parodying the subject of the main plot. Thus when the rebels begin their conspiracy against the king, which is the subject of the main plot, the comic sub-plot also starts it conspiracy against Falstaff. Overall, Falstaff contributes greatly to the play, not only as a comedian, but also a wise Fool, commenting on the major themes of the play, both directly and indirectly. Falstaff, creates humour with his puns and alliterations and never lets the real world play too much of a part in him. The Falstaff world revolves around 'sag' and being rewarded for his 'heroism' in the battle where he fought Hotspur for 'a long hour by Shrewsbury clock'. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Henry V section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Henry V essays

  1. Comparison of Olivier (1944) and Branagh's (1989) screen adaptations of Henry V

    Upon reaching climax both films are similar to one another in the predictable cheer of the soldiers. Under examination we find the scene's visual techniques portray very much the ideas and feelings, which each director sets out to do, however the main point which differentiates the two is neither the

  2. Media Comparative Essay: (in the medium of film) concerning the 2 well known film ...

    Still there is an obvious (yet often subtle) extent to which Branagh tries to differ his scenes. Both versions densely pack broadly filmic effects, which offer interesting contrast and similarity. Conclusively it is only important to consider why such differences and resemblances would be made between the two and ultimately the overall of success in each.

  1. English/ English Literature Joint Coursework Folder

    Branagh replicates Olivier's effect with his own fire. It contrasts his hushed pre-battle atmosphere with ferocity and life. The fire here is on a smaller scale and rather than hide the character's emotions, it reveals them for the audience to analyse and interpret. Such a purposeful difference relates directly to the original film styles where Branagh's attempts more emotion and attention in bringing out the individual expression.

  2. What are the functions of the Chorus in Shakespeare's Henry V?

    For instance, the Act II Chorus, Branagh ends at line 11 of the speech. 'What is promised to Harry and his followers'. He is clever to do this, as it changes the way the audience react and their expectations of the next scenes.

  1. Compare Falstaff and Henry IV as father figures.

    Someone that lies and cheats can't be very good at fathering can he? Falstaff`s faults make him a bad father figure, but should be thought of as a helpful teacher. He shows Hal how to really live and how the common people live, something he will have to understand to become a better king.

  2. Does Henry V offer a patriotic version of Henry's campaigns on the surface while ...

    of his men disliking another because of his nationality he does not attempt to solve the problem but takes sides based on his own particular nationality. This does not make the King look like a very good leader, the night before an important battle he is deepening divisions among his

  1. Henry V - Compare the relationship between Hal and Falstaff in two different scenes

    As Falstaff and Hal are always joking, neither of them takes it too seriously but, deep down they know that something has to be one about Falstaff's thieving. Falstaff blames Hal for leading him astray, and says that before he met Hal he as a good man.

  2. Explore Shakespeare's presentation of Hal and Falstaff in the tavern in Act II Scene ...

    It also shows that Falstaff is quite foolish, to make up so ridiculous lies. I would have Hal, Poins and the other people in the tavern laughing when Falstaff keeps lying, and Hal looking round at everyone else to encourage people to laugh.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work