Should Animals Be Tested On?

Authors Avatar

Ruth Hill-Tout 9N

Persuasive Essay

Should Animals Be Tested On?

        In 2002 a survey was carried out to find out exactly how many animals were used that year in a single company. It was estimated that over 50,000 animals had been used and 74% had suffered side effects and even died due to their treatment. A while before in1991 it had also been discovered that the same company Procter and Gamble (whose products include Pampers and Head and Shoulders) had conducted tests on nearly 300 guinea pigs to determine irritancy and allergic sensitivity to sunscreen ingredients. What is even more barbaric about this is that the information was already available- info, which had been collected and tested on humans.

For decades humans have taken defenceless and innocent wild animals to foully abuse and test their experiments upon. They test powerful drugs and lotions upon the animals and record and write down the at times fatal side effects only to repeat the experiment again and again- regardless of the creatures’ pain or suffering. In one experiment by the Proctor and Gamble company, scientists got hold of a batch of newly born baby mice and cut their toes off to test their theories upon. They were later help up in court for this matter- though disgustingly were let off.

Join now!

        You may think that this picture of a monkey alone would be enough to change peoples mind of whether it is right or wrong to test upon animals less fortunate they we.  Is not the pure look of terror upon the victims face enough to sicken and revolt you?

But no- always it is ‘for the good of us and the development of the modern world’ have you ever heard-  ‘ for the good of the animal kingdom’? I thought not. But that is all we are and ever will be. Animals.

Whatever you may think our ancestors were ...

This is a preview of the whole essay