• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Abolition of The Abolition of Man

Extracts from this document...


The Abolition of The Abolition of Man Clive Staples Lewis, arguably the most influential writer of his time, is nothing more than a callous individual with nothing better to do with his life than to pick at insignificant statements made by less-than-perfect human beings in order to enhance the appearance of his superior intellect. In The Abolition of Man, Lewis attempts to bring out the importance of elementary text books on the human psyche of posterity and how Man will be its own demise due to its constant efforts to conquer nature, but his presentation of the materials both contradicts with itself and will mislead his readers into thinking things that were never meant to be portrayed in the first place. Lewis completely destroys the morale of and belittles two authors who, with some misfortune, placed a few seemingly meaningless statements into their book that could be interpreted in the wrong way. Lewis takes his observations of both this book and his view of nature to the extreme, completely abolishing everything mankind has ever stood for, and for this he is out of line. Lewis opens his book immediately by stating how important elementary textbooks are and how he was given a copy of an English prep book. Immediately he insults the authors of that book by saying, "I shall have nothing good to say of them." A statement like that not only sets the tone of the book, but it also shows how ruthless Clive Staples Lewis actually is. ...read more.


Because this schoolboy has probably never heard statements such as the ones in the Green Book before and will probably never hear them again, his future mental state is safe. This schoolboy does not need a lowlife philosopher picking bones at a book that probably provided some very good information on top of its bad. Lewis sums up his chapter, after presenting more and more hogwash, by stating, "The operation of the Green Book and its kind is to produce what may be called Men without chests." At this point, the connotation put forth by the above statement suggests is contradictory from an earlier statement by Lewis himself. He said, "The authors themselves, I suspect, hardly know what they are doing to the boy." According to that proposal, Lewis does not believe that Gaius and Titius are not aware of what mental strife they may have caused to a child, but the statement at the top of the page, along with the text that surrounds it, brings forth the notion that Gaius and Titius would have had to have purposely planned on destroying the mind of the schoolboy. That is not, however, what Gaius and Titius were truly aimed towards. They are simply innocent writers caught in a mistake that has been sucked dry of any possible reasoning. The audacity Lewis must have to make such a harsh generalization about English authors is completely mind-numbing in its own. If anything, his book is the one young people must look out for if they wish to keep their intellect (and sanity). ...read more.


He claims that as time progresses, the nearer it comes to when the species will be extinct. His argument for less power is that the subjects exhibiting the greater power will be in less numbers due to the approaching extinction. In the end, the human race is to ultimately fall victim to nature and lose its quest for 'Conquest of Nature.' Lewis is completely wrong with his reasoning. Although without a doubt nature will ultimately win, the reasons are not what he states. As time progresses, the number of subjects being influenced by earlier generations will increase. Instead of a gradual decrease in power, time would actually promote a much quicker increase in power. The later generations have no reason to be nearing extinction unless they have already lost to nature. Therefore, that could not possibly be used as a catalyst for the abolition of man. Lewis needs a new job because philosophy is simply not what he was meant to do. He spends too much time picking at trivial things in life, allowing true conflicts to pass him by. Lewis attempts to bring out the importance of elementary text books on the human psyche of posterity and how Man will be its own demise due to its constant efforts to conquer nature, and he fails miserably. One can only be misled by the contradicting ideas of Clive Staples Lewis, not helped. A human being would be better off analyzing the world around them by his or herself. Thankfully Clive Staples Lewis is dead now. There will be no more of his meaningless philosophy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Fyodor Dostoevsky section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Fyodor Dostoevsky essays

  1. Discuss Milton's presentation of Satan in Paradise Lost

    In Books I and II of Paradise Lost, all the scenes are public, and we find no instance of a soliloquy, which is often more revealing of the true feelings of a Period Pieces Imran Hussain character than the dialogue.

  2. Equiano, the Free Man.

    He feels free to show his curiosity, in an almost bare all to these strangers. This openness is what gives these sailors a sense of Equiano's personality which helps to take down the barriers associated with white men and their slaves.

  1. Write a comparison of "The Handsomest Drowned Man in the World" and "The Drowned ...

    Again he uses a simile about the crowd, "covering the arms and legs like a dense flock of seagulls". Ballard is comparing the crowd to scavengers. This further emphasizes the main theme of how societies react to something that is different.

  2. Why do humans need comic book heroes and villains, ...

    Villains in cartoons become someone to hate. The odd one out that everyone loathes, they rampage across time and space creating problems and hatching evil plots, leaving trails of pain, they are the ultimate rogues, despised and only good to be put behind bars.

  1. Crime and Punishment - Writer's Notebook

    Raskolnikov becomes weary of everyone, and longs to tell of his deeds, repeatedly starting to say something, but never quite able to finish and eventually passing out. Raskolnikov suffered immensely, as described above. In his mind he relives his actions over and over again.

  2. Robert Jordan and The Wheel of Time.

    Jordan leaves you wanting more, and waiting to read his next book to find out what happens with his young adventurers. Physical and Magickal Laws The One Power is divided between men and women. Women wield Saidar while men wield Saidin.

  1. The reason behind the hobby-horse.

    We accept his digressions in the narrative as readily as we would in a conversational situation. Tristram, in turn, shows gratitude toward the reader for whom he "would go fifty miles on foot, for I have not a horse worth riding on, to kiss the hand of that man whose

  2. toll bridge In What Way Are Recognition and Conscious a key theme ...

    the fact that he hates to do things that have not been though out himself, but then he realises how aware it is 'truly by thought that we come to do things'. May be sometimes when we have odd, strange reactions for something that are not expected by ourselves, there

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work