• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The central thrust of the Red Badge of Courage is directed towards the puncturing of Henry Fleming's youthful range of illusions."

Extracts from this document...


NUALA LAURO ENGLISH LITERATURE COURSEWORK MODULE BOOK - The Red Badge of Courage Question 6 "The central thrust of the Red Badge of Courage is directed towards the puncturing of Henry Fleming's youthful range of illusions." "Our inescapable conclusion concerning Red Badge of Courage is that Fleming is as deluded as the novel ends as he is when he first joins the Union Forces." Which of the above assessments of the development of Henry Fleming's character do you feel comes closest to the truth? In your answer you should Consider the arguments for and against accepting the question's assertions; Bring to bear knowledge of external critical opinion on the issue; Look at contextual aspects of the novel in relation to the topic under consideration. ANSWER I feel that both these arguments show strong opinions and though both show a critical view of Henry Fleming, they are opposing views. The first statement seems to come closest to the truth in that the narrator uses irony to mock and deride Henry yet at the same time he feels a certain affinity with him also. Statement two is a conclusion but not inescapable as Henry, although still deluded, is not as deluded as he was at the time he joined the Union Army. ...read more.


Paradoxically he mocks when Henry's thoughts turn to death and the hope that he "would be understood" in the afterlife. When Henry celebrates victory too soon and then runs away and when Henry leaves the tattered man to die despite staying with Jim whilst he died. After Henry returns to his own camp and Wilson tends his wound he gets very defensive if anyone mentions his absence or his wound, to the point of him thinking of blackmailing Wilson with the return of his letters and the narrator here shows how Henry is feeling superior yet benevolent, thinking himself the better for not being able to conjure up a scathing remark and how his self justification makes him pompous, devious and condescending. Henrys illusions are punctured again when after bravely fighting, he hears the veterans laughing at him, which only provokes him to further prove his own worth on the battlefield. His perception of the battle is now coloured by the "brotherhood of battle." The second claim, is wrong in that Henry is not as deluded as he was, he has fought his demons and come out on the other side, not perfect, but able to realise that he has done dreadful things and he will have to live with them. ...read more.


Rather like modern stories penned by writers for television and films. I believe that Crane has shown himself to be a psychological realist in writing this piece and that each reader takes from it what they want in relation to their own experiences and knowledge. Perhaps this was a biographical piece and Crane used Henry to show his own delusions. On discussion of this piece, both within a classroom setting and using discussion groups on computer, I have read and heard many differing views of Henry. These views vary depending on the critic's age. Many young people see him as egotistical, judgemental and self absorbed whilst mature students see him as just like most teenagers, too young to be able to see the big picture. Henry may be deluded but like most people once maturity sets in delusions become lessened as experience is gained. In conclusion I feel that statement 1 is true because the story develops many internal storylines one of which is the puncturing of Henry Fleming's youthful range of illusions, of which he has many. Statement 2 on the other hand seems true because Henry is deluded to a certain extent. This is one definite statement with no real detail behind it, the author of it seems to be assuming that Henry can not or will not change. Bibliography attached... ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Henry V section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Henry V essays

  1. Comparison of Olivier (1944) and Branagh's (1989) screen adaptations of Henry V

    The exposure of anxiety in the scene is supported by the non-visual variation of a delicate accompaniment of music, which tone aptly describes the picture of readying and preparation. In effect this complements the pre-scene shot of motion and armament by background foot soldiers.

  2. Media Comparative Essay: (in the medium of film) concerning the 2 well known film ...

    A bold decision is carried out by Olivier to cause the camera to be shot in the entire perspective of Henry. Thus we see Pistol in this version as Henry does. The purpose of this is to create a sense of anonymity and hidden authority in Henry that is not conveyed well in the Branagh adaptation.

  1. English/ English Literature Joint Coursework Folder

    Branagh heavily scrutinised Olivier's epic work, employing and enhancing many of the methods Olivier inspired and developed, causing Branagh's film to be labelled sometimes as an emulation. Still there is an obvious (yet often subtle) extent to which Branagh tries to differ his scene.

  2. In the tradition of aesthetics, Oscar Wilde said, “There is no such thing as ...

    are not beautiful, but in the time this novel was published people were very religious. When Lord Henry was at Basil Hallwards we again see his immorality when smoking drugs. "From his heavy opium tainted cigarette....". This was never seen as a moral action, but he doesn't care about other people's opinions.

  1. The Subplot: Consider the significance of the subplot and examine Shakespeare's dramatic use of ...

    this contrasts with the main story line as most are willing to do as he says because it is the patriotic thing to do. The sub plot is an important factor in the play and therefore contributes vastly to the play as it creates another angle in the play and

  2. Comparing Shakespeare's Henry V to Kenneth Branagh's 1989 Film.

    he dedicate one jot of color: unto the weary and all-watched night : but freshly looks, and overbears attaint with :cheerful semblance and sweet majesty : that every wretch, pining and pale before : beholding him, plucks comfort from his looks (4.1-35-42).

  1. "Falstaff is a dreadful character in every way yet the audience cannot help but ...

    It is another of his repeated claims of promises. Hal and Percy holds honour but Falstaff on the other hand seems to have no honour at all except what he himself fabricates, and ironically, his flexibility and relative ethics keep him alive. Falstaff shows himself to be a conniving, thieving rogue and not even particularly successful at the low pursuits he attempts.

  2. Using the following extracts as a starting point, discuss the ways in which Shakespeare ...

    praising him as divine in a highly turgid manner to emphasise how he is such a highly esteemed Christian leader. The euphony of these two words together further stresses his divine/heavenly Christian status towards the audience. Shakespeare's use of command verbs also adds to the superlative language used throughout Canterbury's

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work