• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The character of Henry V fulfilled the Tudor ideal of the perfect leader and king, yet for 21st century audiences, he remains an ambiguous figure. Consider the difficulties faced by a director of this play.

Extracts from this document...


KING HENRY V The character of Henry V fulfilled the Tudor ideal of the perfect leader and king, yet for 21^st century audiences, he remains an ambiguous figure. Consider the difficulties faced by a director of this play. Does Shakespeare present Henry as a ruthless war-like figure in pursuit of victory whatever the cost, as a golden hero whose story glorifies war, or as a just, sincere man in search of everlasting peace? Discuss with close reference to the text and any film productions you have seen. There are two possible viewpoints to consider when answering this question, looking from the Tudors point of view, there is one simple answer, yes King Henry V was a heroic, patriotic and brilliant leader to his people. However the real depth of a question such as this one is in answering the question from a modern standing, looking back at an often na�ve period of history. Over time, attitudes toward subject such as war, heroism, and what indeed makes a person "great" have undergone drastic changes, people have become individual in their way of thinking and personal viewpoints have become more widely accepted. It is because of this that we can begin to see other sides of Shakespeare's King, and begin to contemplate such things as motive, and personal gratification through Henrys behaviour and decisions. ...read more.


through speeches. One excellent example of such a demonstration would be the speech Henry made to his men just before the battle. The purpose of which was to instil in them a sense of patriotism honour and courage. The main point he wishes to make, is that although they are massively outnumbered, he does not want anymore men than he already has, "Gods will, I pray thee wish not one man more." Creating a tremendous sense of community between them. His main speech starts at line 18 and finishes at line 67, the sheer size of this speech, tells us how much convincing Henry believes he has to do. The King employs a clever use of propaganda throughout by using such stirring sentences as, "But we in it shall be remembered. We few, we happy few, we band of brothers". The speech served its purpose at the time, and was an inspiration to Henry's men, although today this could be seen as underhand and immoral, as he is obviously manipulating the men, and using them as objects be it for personal gain or otherwise. Taking all of these points into consideration many modern day directors of productions choose to portray Henry as a very negative character, often making him into the evil side of the story, and the sinister corruption that lurks behind Shakespeare's story, if it is studied. ...read more.


We are shown truth, and that is why the this version is today consider the best. In conclusion, through analysing Henry's character, I would maintain my original argument. Although through observing what I have said in the main body of this essay it is possible to deduce that there is an outstanding aspect of all three original elements contained within him. Nevertheless it is obvious that the strongest aspect of Henry Shakespeare wished to enforce, was his manipulative, controlling and often sinister side. Again, it would not, of course be fair to say this is Henry's only characteristic, Indeed he shows a somewhat caring and considerate side at times, most predominantly during the time he spends convincing Kate to be his wife. Finally, I would like to state that, it is easy to perceive Shakespeare's Henry as being either a loyal, and heroic King, or as a dominating, overruling leader. Because of this, the main difficulty faced by a director of such a play or film, would be the techniques involved in including all three of these guises in one character. This is why in the two films I have above mentioned we see two different Henry's. The directors have included all three, but one aspect has dominated, leading the viewer to have one fixed view of Henry. Yet, the ideal compromise would be to encourage the reader or viewer to determine Henry's personality through careful character study, thus realising the true essence of Shakespeare's character. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Henry V section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Henry V essays

  1. Comparison of Olivier (1944) and Branagh's (1989) screen adaptations of Henry V

    His carries a much more (periodical) mainstream film technique in use with the trio shot of Henry in a half eyed view, the full view of Pistol and a side garment view of Henry. Branagh cleverly bears in mind to separate characters in the shot, again to easily distinct the class difference.

  2. The Subplot: Consider the significance of the subplot and examine Shakespeare's dramatic use of ...

    Consequently this proves Henry to be a changed king, the subplot and its characters help to show Henry as a politically good and law-abiding king. This helps to dramatise the play as Henry is now seen as a pure and judgmental king who holds the law above friendship, through this he proves that he is not a tyrant.

  1. In the tradition of aesthetics, Oscar Wilde said, “There is no such thing as ...

    "Books are well written or badly written that is all...". Lord Henry Wottons main concern is not to live by morals, and thinks every one else should feel the same as him, "beautiful". "But then in church they don't think" Lord Henry doesn't care about religion or churches because they

  2. Comparing Shakespeare's Henry V to Kenneth Branagh's 1989 Film.

    He always appears on a meta-filmic mode, but he also invites the audience to enter the fictive story. For example, at the beginning of the film, the Chorus speaks directly to the camera in a deserted studio, then opens a huge wooden door: alienation hands over to a powerful irruption in the world of fiction.

  1. Discuss the dramatic purposes of the chorus speeches in Henry V

    Obviously the stage cannot show the sea so apologises for forcing you to use your imagination.

  2. It is easy to see how Henry V can be seen as an inspirational ...

    According to Salic law, the French crown could not be passed down through a woman. Henry saw this as an opportunity to get a wife, and ultimately, a new country for England. These were all wants of the common English person.

  1. Using the following extracts as a starting point, discuss the ways in which Shakespeare ...

    Simile is also used in a similar way to personification as it uses imagery to establish the qualities of Henry's maturity, and therefore superior status. Canterbury employs the simile, 'Consideration, like an angel' (line 28) to emphasise Henry's 'fair regard' for his people, expressing his honest status to the audience.

  2. Media Comparative Essay: Concerning the 2 well known film versions of Shakespeare's Henry V ...

    He would successfully have to "take the familiar and make it new". Branagh heavily scrutinised Olivier's epic work, employing and enhancing many of the methods Olivier inspired and developed, causing Branagh's film to be labelled sometimes as an emulation. Still there is an obvious (yet often subtle)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work