• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The General" written by Siegfried Sassoon, an infantry officer on the Western Front in 1917. source based questions

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework: Source Questions Q.3 Source C is a poem called "The General" and is written by Siegfried Sassoon, an infantry officer on the Western Front in 1917. He criticises the war effort and the plan of attack the Generals used (going over the top). He comments on two particular soldiers (Harry and Jack) who were killed as a result of the Generals ordering them to go over the top: "But he did for them both by his plan of attack." So it could be said that Sassoon is blaming the General for Harry and Jack's death. Of course there were many like Harry and Jack who got wounded or killed when they went over the top. Siegfried Sassoon enlisted as soon as the war had been declared. ...read more.


So Source C is Sassoon's personal view (opinion), which is likely to be biased. Because he became anti war after spending a couple of years at the Front. So even though it is an opinion, it can be said that a lot of the soldiers felt the same way. That agrees with my own knowledge. A more cynical approach to war would've been appearing in soldiers' minds as time went by. Q.4 Source D was written by Lloyd George in 1935 and it's called "Lloyd George's War Memoirs". It is written for the public. He criticises Sir Douglas Haig's abilities as Commander-in-Chief of the army. He calls him a "...second rate commander..." But he did not attack or sack Haig during the war because he thought it would "undermine public confidence". ...read more.


It could be said that he wore them down. Lloyd George is criticising Haig because people blamed Haig for the immense loss of life at the Somme. And Lloyd George didn't replace Haig. So now in his memoirs maybe he is self-justifying what he did, because he claims it would've dented public confidence but it could've in fact boosted public confidence Source E gives some of the good qualities of Haig. The author (a historian) says that there wasn't any other way suggested or likely to work except a war of attrition. But the historian also recognises the cost at which Haig won the war. Both sources are secondary. And there was no censorship issued by the government the time they were written. It is fact that Haig won the war, but at a high price. And the success of a general depends on whether or not he wins wars, does it not? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. Conscientious Objection Sources Questions

    This learned man, Robert Saunders, shows a disgust towards conscientious objectors and describes them as having 'no trace of patriotism, courage or self-respect'. Therefore this source agrees with the quote such that people were hostile towards conscientious objectors, however this source alone does not show whether the public shared this view.

  2. "'Lions led by donkeys.' How valid is this interpretation of the conduct of British ...

    The source also gives an "official portrait" of Haig, which is reliable, however its purpose is to make Haig look a very strong and powerful figurehead to the war's leadership. Haig was a very close friend to the King. This relationship is said to be one of the biggest reasons why Haig was in a powerful position during the war.

  1. The First World War - The Stalemate on the Western Front - Source based ...

    This highlights the fact that attacking the enemies trench lines was futile as it was to hard to keep a gain in ground once you have created a salient which can be attacked from many different side. An example of troops attacking and then having to withdraw are the battles

  2. "Poems and stories; official accounts. Which of these give a more accurate picture of ...

    In this case study Official accounts tended to be very useful, and in a sense quite reliable, as they were censored, would not exaggerate how poor conditions were. However I found that censorship issues are a cause for concern with official accounts, as staged photos can spoil accuracy.

  1. Why is it so difficult to know what soldiers thought? ...

    that they would not get too wet although some of the trenches didn't have duck boards so the soldiers did get wet and sometimes it was waist high the water so they would also be freezing. We know how bad life in the trenches was because many soldiers had described

  2. History Coursework: ''Lions led by Donkeys

    The trenches were crammed with soldiers, wounded or alive, and they had to share their living quarters with lice and rats. We are told about the state of the trenches in source C1, written by Siegfried Sassoon who was a captain on the Western Front.

  1. Were the British Generals like Sir Douglas Haig responsible for the high casualty figures?

    Correlli Barnett wrote this quote in 1979. So, because all these quotes say that the bombardment was a mistake, they are reliable as each source supports each other. Another mistake that the generals made was that they expected the guns to destroy the German front lines.

  2. Life on the Western Front - Sources Questions

    I personally think letters in the personal section give the most information about trench life because in the official account the trenches are shown as they are meant to be, not as they actually are. Whereas in the personal account soldiers describe what the trenches are like.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work