• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The General" written by Siegfried Sassoon, an infantry officer on the Western Front in 1917. source based questions

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework: Source Questions Q.3 Source C is a poem called "The General" and is written by Siegfried Sassoon, an infantry officer on the Western Front in 1917. He criticises the war effort and the plan of attack the Generals used (going over the top). He comments on two particular soldiers (Harry and Jack) who were killed as a result of the Generals ordering them to go over the top: "But he did for them both by his plan of attack." So it could be said that Sassoon is blaming the General for Harry and Jack's death. Of course there were many like Harry and Jack who got wounded or killed when they went over the top. Siegfried Sassoon enlisted as soon as the war had been declared. ...read more.

Middle

So Source C is Sassoon's personal view (opinion), which is likely to be biased. Because he became anti war after spending a couple of years at the Front. So even though it is an opinion, it can be said that a lot of the soldiers felt the same way. That agrees with my own knowledge. A more cynical approach to war would've been appearing in soldiers' minds as time went by. Q.4 Source D was written by Lloyd George in 1935 and it's called "Lloyd George's War Memoirs". It is written for the public. He criticises Sir Douglas Haig's abilities as Commander-in-Chief of the army. He calls him a "...second rate commander..." But he did not attack or sack Haig during the war because he thought it would "undermine public confidence". ...read more.

Conclusion

It could be said that he wore them down. Lloyd George is criticising Haig because people blamed Haig for the immense loss of life at the Somme. And Lloyd George didn't replace Haig. So now in his memoirs maybe he is self-justifying what he did, because he claims it would've dented public confidence but it could've in fact boosted public confidence Source E gives some of the good qualities of Haig. The author (a historian) says that there wasn't any other way suggested or likely to work except a war of attrition. But the historian also recognises the cost at which Haig won the war. Both sources are secondary. And there was no censorship issued by the government the time they were written. It is fact that Haig won the war, but at a high price. And the success of a general depends on whether or not he wins wars, does it not? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. "'Lions led by donkeys.' How valid is this interpretation of the conduct of British ...

    Sassoon's experiences in the trenches led to him having a huge hatred towards the government and the way the war was conducted in general. The second poem is about how stupidity in leadership decisions led to the loss of many lives, which can be used to backup the statement of "Lions led by donkeys".

  2. History Coursework: ''Lions led by Donkeys

    This was due to many reasons, many of which related to Field Marshall Haig. Haig was a man of higher class that had had previous combat experience in the South African War, some 11 years previous to the First World War.

  1. Were the British Generals like Sir Douglas Haig responsible for the high casualty figures?

    This meant that when the allied troops advanced, the German troops were waiting for them equipped with machine guns, they had caused complete devastation. The bombardment had not only failed to kill the Germans, but it had also failed to destroy the German wire.

  2. Why is it so difficult to know what soldiers thought? ...

    One of the soldiers a private Pressey of the royal artillery sent a letter home to his parents and told them about the biscuits that they were getting. "The biscuits are so hard that you had to put them on a firm surface and smash them with a stone or something.

  1. The western front - source related questions and answers

    back out, the ground was muddy and slippery, and you would also have the other sides snipers firing at you, making it highly difficult to gain any ground. Frances Tugwell 2. Can we trust Coppard's account in source B of the beginning of the battle of the Somme?

  2. "Poems and stories; official accounts. Which of these give a more accurate picture of ...

    The next source I am going to study is a poem by Mary Borden, The poem is entitled the song of the mud and is about the conditions in the trenches and the effects it had on the soldiers. Mary Borden - The Song of The Mud (1917)

  1. In the wars, Robert Rose is a very significant character.

    STORKS page seventy-seven Storks were the only bird that one of the soldiers could remember. This could be due to the fact that storks are related to birth and the soldier wanted to be re-born to be out of the situation of war.

  2. The First World War - The Stalemate on the Western Front - Source based ...

    The mud was created by the artillery shells completely destroying the drainage systems around the low lying area of Flanders. The thing about the mud though was that, it wasn't just a hindrance to the allies but also to the Germans which is usually forgotten, when people think of World

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work